LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Abstract
Restorative Proctocolectomy (RP) with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) represents the gold-standard surgical treatment for patients requiring total colonic and rectal removal due to ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and other colonic pathologies. The laparoscopic approach (L-IPAA) has been increasingly utilized in pediatric and young adult populations to enhance recovery and reduce morbidity; however, its benefits over open surgery (O-IPAA) remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes between L-IPAA and O-IPAA, focusing on complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay (LOS).
Keywords
Ileal Pouch-anal AnastomosisLaparoscopic SurgeryPediatric Colorectal SurgeryUlcerative ColitisFamilial Adenomatous PolyposisRestorative ProctocolectomyHashtags
#PediatricSurgery#LaparoscopicIPAA#ColorectalSurgery#InflammatoryBowelDiseaseThis article is published on an external journal. Click below to read the full text.
Read full article ↗How to cite: GlobalCastMD. LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN ILEAL POUCH-ANAL ANASTOMOSIS IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2026-02-25. https://origin-library.globalcastmd.com/article/11560
Comments (0)