StayCurrentMD · Comparison of robotic versus thoracoscopic repair for congenital esophageal atresia
Follow
Video56 s·Published Feb 2024Older

Comparison of robotic versus thoracoscopic repair for congenital esophageal atresia

hosted by Dr. Cecilia Gigena

Chapter 1 of 1 · Evidence & Research

Robotic vs Thoracoscopic Repair for Esophageal Atresia

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to esophageal atresia · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →
What the experts said0 expert statements · 7 host summaries
The study is a retrospective multi-center study done in China
Host summaryCecilia Gigena summarizing a resource · not cited in answers
After propensity score matching, there were 126 patients total, 63 in each group
Host summaryCecilia Gigena summarizing a resource · not cited in answers
Robotic surgery had longer operative time compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena summarizing a resource · not cited in answers
Robotic surgery had shorter anastomotic time compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena summarizing a resource · not cited in answers
The robotic group had lower anastomotic strictures compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena summarizing a resource · not cited in answers
The robotic group had lower unplanned readmissions within 2 years post-op compared to thoracoscopic repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena summarizing a resource · not cited in answers
Robotic surgery appears to be a good option for esophageal atresia repair
Host summaryCecilia Gigena summarizing a resource · not cited in answers