StayCurrentMD · Regional lymph node evaluation in pediatric conventional melanoma subtype: a single-center 10-year review
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2024Older

Regional lymph node evaluation in pediatric conventional melanoma subtype: a single-center 10-year review

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Mar 2024 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study of 33 pediatric conventional melanoma patients found that positive sentinel lymph node status and older age at diagnosis predicted higher recurrence risk, but completion lymph node dissection showed no prognostic or therapeutic benefit. The findings challenge routine CLND in pediatric melanoma management.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the prognostic and therapeutic significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) in pediatric conventional melanoma (CM), while evaluating potential predictive factors for outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records spanning 2009–2020, focusing on patients aged 18 or younger with localized cutaneous conventional melanoma.

Results

Among the 33 patients, SLNB detected metastasis in 57.6% of cases, with 52.6% undergoing CLND. Positive SLN patients had higher relapse risk (HR 5.92; 95% CI 1.27–27.7; P = 0.024) but similar overall survival (HR 3.19; 95% CI 0.31–33.1, P = 0.33).

No significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and OS were found between patients who underwent CLND and those who did not (HR 1.91; 95% CI 0.49–7.43, P = 0.35, and HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.03–8.32, P = 0.64, respectively). Univariate analysis showed age at diagnosis (P = 0.02) correlated with higher recurrence risk, with a 21% hazard increase per additional year of age.

Conclusions

Positive SLN status and age at diagnosis were associated with worse DFS in CM patients. Our study did not find any prognostic or therapeutic value in CLND for pediatric melanoma. Further multicenter trials are needed to confirm our single-institution experience.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →