Live Event Content · BOB in Ped Surg 2023 - IPEG Winner - Fulvia Del Conte, MD
Video·Published Feb 2023Older

BOB in Ped Surg 2023 - IPEG Winner - Fulvia Del Conte, MD

With Dr. Fulvia Delconte

Chapter 1 of 4 · Evidence & Research

Session intro

Introduction and Session Overview

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to pulmonary sequestration · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →

More about this diagnosis

Pulmonary sequestration
What the experts said30 expert statements · 1 host summary
The study aimed to evaluate and compare the results of embolization and surgical treatments of pulmonary sequestration in pediatric patients.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Only Group 2 (embolization) patients performed MRI or CT scan to check the complete evolution of the lesion.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
At one year follow-up, one Group 1 patient required surgical revision after two weeks due to an infected intralobar sequestration.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Three pediatric surgery units and four pediatric cardiological units were involved in the study.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
In one Group 2 patient, it was impossible to complete the embolization procedure and the patient was referred to surgeons.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Patients younger than three years old who received embolization or surgical treatment for pulmonary sequestration between January 2010 and December 2020 were included.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
All symptomatic patients became asymptomatic at the one year follow-up.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
All procedures were performed under general anesthesia.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
At long-term follow-up, only six embolization patients performed imaging, and two of them required reintervention due to recurrence, with only one being symptomatic.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Surgical approach was performed using three or four trocars with the first one placed on the anterior axillary line with an open technique.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Arterial embolization was performed by transfemoral approach in all cases, identifying the aberrant artery which was cannulated and closed by vascular plug devices.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Surgery and endovascular embolization are both effective and safe treatments for pulmonary sequestration.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
The main difference is that surgical approach allows removal of the lesion, avoiding the need to monitor pathological tissue and its complete evolution over time.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
85 patients were included and divided into two groups: Group 1 with 51 patients (surgical) and Group 2 with 34 patients (embolization).
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
No differences were found in sex distribution and intralobar versus extralobar distribution between groups.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Surgical approach should be the preferential choice, especially in cases of intralobar sequestration or suspected complicated lesions.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
Prenatal diagnosis was significantly higher in Group 1 (surgical group) as well as symptomatic patients.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
There were no differences in procedure time and intensive care unit stay after procedure between the two groups.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Embolization should be used in cases of severe symptoms or heart failure, with long-term follow-up supported by imaging recommended.
GuidelineFulvia Delconte
Hospitalization was significantly shorter in Group 1 (surgical) because 24 patients were treated as day case surgery.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Conversion to open surgery was necessary in five Group 1 cases.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Three hybrid lesions were found in Group 1 patients.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
Two Group 1 patients were previously approached by embolization.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
In Group 1, follow-up was based on clinical examination and chest X-ray.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
In the study, only six embolization patients performed MRI at long-term follow-up, and within them two presented recurrence.
ClinicalFulvia Delconte
It is very important to perform imaging in all embolization patients to check complete evolution and ensure the lesion does not recur.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
With surgery, long-term imaging follow-up is not needed, which is a big difference from embolization.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
The follow-up after embolization is invasive and heavy for parents because they remain with doubt that the lesion has not completely disappeared.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
Even if there is a small rate of malignancy in sequestrations, patients must be followed in all cases.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
Embolization cannot resolve the problem of potential malignancy, so it should be reserved only for cases where surgery cannot be performed.
OpinionFulvia Delconte
Pulmonary sequestrations have a very low malignancy rate.
Host summaryFulvia Delconte summarizing a resource · not cited in answers