StayCurrentMD · Differential expression profiling of onco and tumor-suppressor genes from major-signaling pathways in Wilms’ tumor
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Nov 2022Older

Differential expression profiling of onco and tumor-suppressor genes from major-signaling pathways in Wilms’ tumor

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Nov 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Study profiles mRNA expression of 36 oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes across major signaling pathways in 24 Wilms' tumor cases. PBRM1, ERBB2, and EGFR show promise as diagnostic markers with >91% differential expression rates, while traditional WT1 gene shows variable expression patterns.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

Wilms’ tumor is the most-frequent malignant-kidney tumor in children under 3–4 years of age and is caused by genetic alterations of oncogenes (OG) and tumor-suppressor genes (TG). Wilms’ tumor has been linked to many OG-&-TG. However, only WT1 has a proven role in the development of this embryonic-tumor.

Methods

The study investigates the level of mRNA expression of 16 OGs and 20 TGs involved in key-signaling pathways, including chromatin modification; RAS; APC; Cell Cycle/Apoptosis; Transcriptional Regulation; PI3K; NOTCH-&-HH; PI3K & RAS of 24-fresh Wilms’-tumor cases by capture-and-reporter probe Code-Sets chemistry, as CNVs in these pathway genes have been reported.

Results

Upon extensively investigating, MEN1, MLL2, MLL3, PBRM1, PRDM1, SMARCB1, SETD2, WT1, PTPN11, KRAS, HRAS, NF1, APC, RB1, FUBP1, BCOR, U2AF1, PIK3CA, PTEN, EBXW7, SMO, ALK, CBL, EP300-and-GATA1 were found to be significantly up-regulated in 58.34, 62.5, 79.17, 91.67, 58, 66.66,54, 58.34, 66.67, 75, 62.5, 62.5, 58, 79.17, 79.17, 75, 70.84, 50, 50, 75, 66.66, 62.50, 61.66, 58.34-and-62.50% of cases respectively, whereas BRAF, NF2, CDH1, BCL2, FGFR3, ERBB2, MET, RET, EGFR-and-GATA2 were significantly down regulated in 58, 87.50, 79.16, 54.16, 79.17, 91.66, 66.66, 58.33, 91.66-and-62.50% of cases, respectively. Interestingly, the WT1 gene was five-fold down regulated in 41.66% of cases only.

Conclusion

Hence, extensive profiling of OGs and TGs association of major-signaling pathways in Wilms’ tumor cases may aid in disease diagnosis. PBRM1 (up-regulated in 91.67% of cases), ERBB2 and EGFR (down-regulated in 91.66 and 91.66% of cases, respectively) could be marker genes. However, validation of all relevant results in a larger number of samples is required.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →