Dr. Alexander Chiu · Draf IIB with superior septectomy: finding the “middle ground”
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Jun 2026

Draf IIB with superior septectomy: finding the “middle ground”

onlinelibrary.wiley.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on onlinelibrary.wiley.com ↗

Article · Jun 2026 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This cadaveric study evaluates a modified Draf IIb frontal sinusotomy with superior septectomy as an intermediate surgical option for patients with diffuse polyposis and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. Fluorescein irrigation studies demonstrated equivalent sinus penetration compared to the more extensive endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure, suggesting this technique may offer similar therapeutic benefit with potentially less morbidity.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Alexander Chiu

Background Previous studies have demonstrated a high failure rate of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with Draf IIa in patients with diffuse polyposis, asthma, and aspirin‐exacerbated respiratory disease. A high percentage of these patients progress to endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP). We describe a modification of the Draf IIb with a superior septectomy (IIb+SS), which may provide similar therapeutic benefit as demonstrated by the distribution of sinus irrigations in the sinus cavity with ESS with IIb+SS vs ESS with EMLP. Methods ESS with IIb+SS was performed on 6 cadaver heads. Fluorescein‐dyed irrigations were performed on each head and penetration was recorded using video endoscopy. EMLP was subsequently performed on each head with repeat dye‐irrigation and video endoscopy. The videos were reviewed by 4 blinded fellowship‐trained rhinologists, and irrigant penetration of the maxillary, ethmoid, frontal, sphenoid sinuses, and olfactory cleft was graded 0 to 3 (3 implying complete staining). Results The mean scores when comparing IIb+SS to EMLP were as follows: overall 1.99 vs 1.97 ( p = 0.816), maxillary sinus 2.67 vs 2.38 ( p = 0.128), ethmoid sinus 1.88 vs 1.98 ( p = 0.536), sphenoid sinus 2.58 vs 2.50 ( p = 0.467), frontal sinus 1.13 vs 1.38 ( p = 0.073), and olfactory cleft 1.71 vs 1.63 ( p = 0.529). There was no significant difference between subsites. Interrater reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.781). Conclusion Performing ESS with IIb+SS provides

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →