From
StayCurrentMD
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: December 2021
With Dr. George W. Holcomb III & Dr. Louise Montalva & Dr. Sean Kumasaki · hosted by Dr. Rod Gerardo
Chapter 1 of 3 · Evidence & Research
ERAS protocols
ERAS After Minimally Invasive Surgery: Systematic Review
Expert statements on this page
No expert statements were drawn from this page.
Host summaries · secondary, not cited in answers
Educational content from recorded physician discussions — not medical advice. Talk to your (or your child's) care team about your situation.
Video
Comparación de la cirugía robótica versus toracoscópica para la reparación de la atresia de esófago
Published Jan 2024
Video
Neonatal Thoracotomy Has 25% Chance of Chest Wall Deformity
Published Jan 2018
Podcast
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Article Review: October 2023
12 min · Published Apr 2024
Video
Prophylactic Acid-suppression Medication to Prevent Anastomotic Strictures After Oesophageal Atresia Surgery
Published Dec 2023
Video
Tips and Tricks: EA & TEF
Dr. Steve Rothenberg · 9 min · Published Dec 2012
Video
Thoracoscopic TEF Repair, Is It Really Better Than Open? Update Course 2018
18 min · Published Aug 2018
Video
Intestinal Atresia Types Explained: Grossfeld Classification for Pediatric Surgery
1 min · Published Sep 2026
Video
Derivation and validation of the Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia Severity (PedCAPS) score: A prospective cohort study
50 s · Published Sep 2026
Video
FETO for Late-Diagnosed Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) at Cincinnati Children's with Dr. Beth Rymeski
4 min · Published Sep 2026
Video
Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) Case: FETO Management & Unexpected Findings with Dr. Beth Rymeski
3 min · Published Sep 2026
Video
Fetoscopic Endoluminal Tracheal Occlusion (FETO) Procedure: Step-by-Step Guide with Dr. Beth Rymeski
4 min · Published Sep 2026
Video
Choledochal Cyst Types Explained: Pediatric Surgery Fundamentals
1 min · Published Sep 2026
What the experts said
The systematic review included 9 studies examining ERAS protocols after minimally invasive surgery (thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, or retroperitoneoscopy) in pediatric patients, searching literature back to 1975.
ERAS protocols after minimally invasive surgery showed decreased length of stay and decreased 30-day readmission rates compared to standard care.
ERAS protocols after minimally invasive surgery showed no increase in complication rates compared to standard care.
ERAS protocols have shown that hospital stays for many surgical patients can be abbreviated, which is relevant for mobilizing hospital beds during the COVID-19 pandemic.
For the Paris group, the ultimate goal of ERAS is same-day discharge, with the most important outcome being that the child can return to normal life at home the night after or day after surgery.
The Johns Hopkins study examined neonates who underwent operative repair for esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula from 2014 to 2018, comparing open approach, thoracoscopy, and conversions to open.
The study included almost 900 neonates with EA/TEF.
Only about 16% of EA/TEF operative approaches were thoracoscopic, with the vast majority approached through traditional open thoracotomy.
The conversion rate from thoracoscopic to open EA/TEF repair was approximately 50%.
Despite the high conversion rate from thoracoscopic to open EA/TEF repair, there was no increased rate of complications in converted patients.
Increasing adoption of thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair requires regular practice and mentorship with someone who performs the procedure, ideally as part of fellowship training.
A mentorship program involving in-person mentorship followed by telementoring is probably the only way to measurably get practicing surgeons performing thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair.
Simulators for practicing thoracoscopic anastomosis in a 3 kg chest are improving and may help increase utilization of thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair.
Long-term outcomes are likely to be better with thoracoscopic approach for EA/TEF repair.
The Children's Mercy Hospital study was a retrospective chart review of patients with slipping rib syndrome from 2006 to 2020, including 49 patients who underwent 67 operations.
Slipping rib syndrome is being recognized more frequently and patients are typically not going to get better with conservative management.
Patients with slipping rib syndrome are frequently symptomatic for years and have often seen multiple physicians across multiple disciplines, sometimes traveling from city to city.
A reasonable surgical candidate for slipping rib syndrome is a patient who had a reasonable result from local injection but then had pain recur.
On physical examination for slipping rib syndrome, the area between ribs 9 and 11 in the anterolateral costal margin is typically tender and palpation can replicate the pain.
In some slipping rib syndrome cases, the rib pop can be felt on examination, patients can replicate it themselves by turning to the side or flexing their abdomen, or the rib movement can be seen.
Pressing on the sides of the chest simultaneously will frequently replicate the anterior pain in slipping rib syndrome patients.
Applying ERAS protocols can achieve further reduction in postoperative discomfort and hospitalization beyond the benefits of minimally invasive surgery alone.
A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair is unlikely to ever be conducted.
The slipping rib syndrome study showed good outcomes with costal cartilage resection at 4.5-year follow-up and represents one of the bigger cohorts with long-term follow-up data.
