Sophie Carr

33 statements · 1 topic · summaries given as host listed separately

Featured statements

▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
Surgical site infections are a costly, yet modifiable source morbidity, particularly within the neonatal population.
▶ Ep 3 · 4:43
The majority of cases were class two clean contaminated cases, which is more in keeping with the literature in terms of adult SSI reduction in use of CHG antisepsis.

Nothing matches these filters — clear the search or widen the filters.

Sophie's statements about Surgical Site Infections 33 statements

Open the Surgical Site Infections collection →

PAPS - Optimizing skin antisepsis for neonatal surgery - Sophie Carr

▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
quote Surgical site infections are a costly, yet modifiable source morbidity, particularly within the neonatal population. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
quote A total of 50 patients were included, none of which experienced adverse skin prep outcomes. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
clinical Surgical site infections are a costly, yet modifiable source of morbidity, particularly within the neonatal population. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
epidemiological Equivalent data does not yet exist for the neonatal surgical population comparing CHG-IPA to povidone iodine. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
clinical The protocol inclusion was limited to general surgery patients with 34 weeks post conceptual age and 1500 grams as the lower age and weight limits. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
clinical Either 2% or 0.5% CHG solution was used based on age cutoffs. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
clinical Skin integrity was assessed using a validated tool called the neonatal skin condition score. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
clinical Implementation of the protocol occurred in February 2020. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
clinical A total of 50 patients were included, none of which experienced adverse skin prep outcomes. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
epidemiological 8% of patients in the CHG cohort developed SSIs within the 30-day post-op period compared to 14% in the matched retrospective povidone cohort. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
epidemiological A comparison of SSI rates between the CHG versus PI cohort revealed no significant difference. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:43
clinical The protocol was largely modeled off the McGill protocol used in Quebec, Canada, which used a lower age cutoff of 28 weeks gestational age with a lower weight cutoff of 1000 grams. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:43
clinical The majority of cases were class two clean contaminated cases, which is more in keeping with the literature in terms of adult SSI reduction in use of CHG antisepsis. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:43
clinical The project was conducted in conjunction with initiatives including optimizing antibiotic prophylaxis, using adherent draping, and for class two clean contaminated cases, using a clean closure bundle including changing gloves prior to closure. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:26
clinical The protocol applied to all general surgery cases that did not have any open exposed mucosa and in which the patient was not allergic to CHG or IPA. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:26
epidemiological The decrease in SSI was not statistically significant. ↗

PAPS Best of the Best Winner

▶ Ep 4 · 1:55
quote Surgical site infections are a costly yet modifiable source of morbidity, particularly within the neonatal population. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 1:55
clinical Surgical site infections are a costly yet modifiable source of morbidity, particularly within the neonatal population. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 2:28
epidemiological Equivalent data does not yet exist for the neonatal surgical population for CHG versus povidone antisepsis. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 3:30
clinical The neonatal skin antisepsis protocol included lower limits of 34 weeks post-conception age and 1500 grams weight, limited to general surgery patients only. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 3:45
clinical The protocol used either 2% or 0.5% CHG based on age cutoffs. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 3:52
clinical Skin integrity was assessed using a validated tool called the neonatal skin condition score. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:15
clinical Implementation of the protocol occurred in February 2020. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:25
quote A total of 50 patients were included, none of which experienced adverse skin prep outcomes. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:25
clinical A total of 50 patients were included in the protocol, none of which experienced adverse skin prep outcomes. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:35
epidemiological 8% of patients on the CHG protocol developed SSIs within the 30-day post-op period compared to 14% in the matched retrospective povidone cohort. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:48
epidemiological A comparison of SSI rates between the CHG versus povidone cohort revealed no significant difference. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 6:20
clinical The majority of cases were class two clean-contaminated cases. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:00
clinical The protocol was largely modeled off the McGill protocol used in Quebec, Canada, which used a lower age cutoff of 28 weeks gestational age with a lower weight cutoff of 1,000 grams. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 8:00
clinical The project was conducted in conjunction with multiple SSI reduction initiatives including optimizing antibiotic prophylaxis, using adherent draping, and implementing a clean closure bundle for class two clean-contaminated cases. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 8:25
clinical The clean closure bundle included changing gloves prior to closure. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 9:43
epidemiological The decrease in SSI rate from 14% to 8% was not statistically significant. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 9:55
clinical The protocol was used for all general surgery cases that did not have any open exposed mucosa and in which the patient was not allergic to CHG or IPA. ↗

Summaries Sophie gave as host · 10 summaries

Recaps of other experts' statements, not Sophie's own clinical position.

Summaries Sophie gave as host · Surgical Site Infections 10 summaries

Open the Surgical Site Infections collection →

PAPS - Optimizing skin antisepsis for neonatal surgery - Sophie Carr

▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: Although commonly used within the neonatal population, current product labeling discourages CHG IPA antisepsis in infants under two months of age, as there is limited safety data and concerns around adverse effects, particularly skin injuries. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: A growing body of evidence in adults suggests that chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol provide superior protection against SSIs than povidone iodine. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: CHG antisepsis is commonly used for invasive non-surgical procedures in NICUs and for prevention of newborn nosocomial infections in developing countries. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:00
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: Current product labeling discourages CHG IPA antisepsis in infants under two months of age due to limited safety data and concerns around adverse effects, particularly skin injuries. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:43
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: The primary adverse concern is skin reactions with less than 28 weeks gestational age being the primary population affected by those in the literature. ↗

PAPS Best of the Best Winner

▶ Ep 4 · 2:15
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: A growing body of evidence in adults suggests that chlorhexidine gluconate and isopropyl alcohol provide superior protection against SSIs than povidone. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 2:35
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: CHG antisepsis is commonly used for invasive non-surgical procedures in NICUs and for prevention of newborn nosocomial infections in developing countries. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 2:48
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: Current product labeling discourages CHG-IPA antisepsis in infants under two months of age due to limited safety data and concerns around adverse effects, particularly skin injuries. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 2:48
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: Although commonly used within the neonatal population, current product labeling discourages CHG IPA antisepsis in infants under two months of age, as there is limited safety data and concerns around adverse effects, particularly skin injuries. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:45
host summary Sophie Carr summarizes what Dr. Rebecca Rentea said: Less than 28 weeks gestational age is the primary population affected by adverse skin reactions in the literature. ↗