Photo of Daniel von Allmen

Daniel von Allmen

1339 statements · 28 topics · summaries given as host listed separately

Adrenal Tumors · guest expert Aerodigestive / ENT · guest expert Biliary Atresia · guest expert Colorectal / ARM & Hirschsprung · guest expert Etiologies (Gastroschisis/NEC/Atresia/Volvulus) · guest expert Fetal Surgery · guest expert Intestinal Failure · guest expert Intestinal Rehab · guest expert Intestinal Transplant · guest expert Neuroblastoma · guest expert Soft Tissue Sarcoma (lymph nodes) · guest expert Wilms Tumor · guest expert

Featured statements

▶ Ep 26 · 42:45
If I have a patient who has a stricture that's been dilated 2 or 3 times, my next move would be to address reflux. Most of the patients we leave on anti-reflux medications when they are discharged from the hospital. I would argue that virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux. If they have a stricture that is not responsive to dilations, it dilates easily and then restrictures. I personally am very aggressive about doing a fundoplication on those patients
▶ Ep 26 · 27:38
They published a series a year ago or so in JPS looking at their results, and, and it was a very carefully well documented report of their results, and the data are striking if you Have a patient who has a primary atresia that you address, then in 98% of patients they're able to get the two ends of the esophagus together. In contrast, if it's a patient who's had previous surgeries and it's a secondary approach, then only 2/3 of those patients ever get the esophagus together.
▶ Ep 21 · 22:20
I completely agree, and I think that you have to be very careful. I personally like to just use a blade, electric cautery and with a little buzz and then mostly blunt dissection with the flat end of the blade, and I think that. That can help you and staying right on the esophagus, which is usually very thickened because it's an obstructed piece of bowel. I would rather be in the esophagus than be in the trachea up high in the chest.
▶ Ep 5 · 9:03
You can get extraordinary length on this. And Mike and I have done a few cases for kids who had disasters, multiple operations elsewhere, who had caustic injuries that were involved all the way up to the pharynx, where we had to do a lot of work just on the pharynx to get that open, and then literally sew the colon interposition to the pharynx and then down to the stomach, which is obviously tough to do with a gastric pull-up.
▶ Ep 5 · 0:46
Our method here is that if we have a child with no gas in the abdomen and we take them to the OR and put a G-tube in, many times we'll do, we'll put something up the distal esophagus at that point and just get a fluoro shot. But then we'd wait a couple of weeks and we have our patients go down to interventional radiology where we have a protocol for measuring the gap.
▶ Ep 8 · 27:38
the data are striking if you Have a patient who has a primary atresia that you address, then in 98% of patients they're able to get the two ends of the esophagus together. In contrast, if it's a patient who's had previous surgeries and it's a secondary approach, then only 2/3 of those patients ever get the esophagus together.

Nothing matches these filters — clear the search or widen the filters.

Daniel's statements about Adrenal Tumors 48 statements

Open the Adrenal Tumors collection →

Topics in 10: Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 1 · 0:41
clinical In younger patients, neuroblastoma is often picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids (two-year-old or three-year-old) as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:41
quote So in the younger patients, they're oftentimes picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids, say two-year-old or three-year-old, it might be picked up as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:41
clinical When neuroblastoma patients have metastatic disease, they may present with either bony pain or potentially neurologic symptoms from cord compression. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:07
clinical When considering neuroblastoma as part of the differential diagnosis, it is important to get catecholamines (either urine or serum) as one of the most diagnostic laboratory tests for this tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:39
clinical Most children with suspected neuroblastoma would get a cross-sectional imaging study, either a CT scan or an MRI. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:39
clinical If imaging suggests neuroblastoma (central abdominal mass or adrenal mass rather than kidney mass), the next test would be a nuclear medicine study, typically an MIBG study. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:39
clinical The MIBG study is helpful for confirming the diagnosis of neuroblastoma and can also demonstrate metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:20
clinical Some centers, including Cincinnati Children's Hospital, would get a PET scan looking for tumor uptake as well as potential metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:20
clinical About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:20
quote About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:45
guideline Based on the most recent iteration of the neuroblastoma staging system (INRGSS), it is possible to assign a stage before any invasive procedure is performed. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:45
guideline In the INRGSS system, tumors that are localized are categorized as L1; if localized but have image-defined risk factors (encasing nerves or vessels), they are L2; if they have metastatic disease, they are M. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:45
guideline There is a special category MS for children less than 18 months of age who have metastases to either the bone marrow or the skin. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 3:36
guideline The prior neuroblastoma staging system required tissue diagnosis before assigning a stage. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 3:36
guideline The INRGSS pre-biopsy staging system was specifically created to allow studies from different centers in different countries to be compared based on the pre-surgical staging of the patient. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:06
opinion Some surgeons would approach resection of a localized neuroblastoma with laparoscopy depending on the size of the tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:06
clinical A child with an adrenal mass on the right side and a positive MIBG scan but no evidence of metastases could potentially be treated with a primary resection of the mass via laparotomy. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:44
clinical For very large masses that encase the aorta, cava, or other major vasculature, all you really want is tissue for diagnosis, which can be obtained through open biopsy, laparoscopic biopsy, or core needle biopsies done by an interventional radiologist. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:14
clinical The most important biologic risk determinant to obtain from neuroblastoma biopsy tissue is the NMIC status. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:14
clinical In addition to NMIC status, you want to look for 1P and 11Q deletions and Shimada histology in neuroblastoma biopsy tissue. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:45
clinical Biologic risk determinants from biopsy will tell you what risk category the patient falls into: very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:45
epidemiological Neuroblastoma risk is divided about 50-50 between the low risk categories and the high risk category, with a smaller percentage being intermediate risk. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:11
clinical Patients with high risk neuroblastoma receive aggressive chemotherapy including peripheral stem cell transplant times 2, aggressive surgery with the goal of greater than 90% resection of the tumor, followed by radiation, immunotherapy after chemotherapy, and potentially retinoic acid therapy. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:11
clinical NMIC amplification and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:11
quote NMIC and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:51
clinical For intermediate risk neuroblastoma, the goal at the time of debulking or resecting the primary tumor is to achieve at least a 50% response from the initial volume of the primary tumor through the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:51
clinical Intermediate risk neuroblastoma tumors get varying cycles of chemotherapy based on the biologic risk factors they have. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:22
clinical Jed Nocturne led a study through the Children's Oncology Group looking at patients less than six months of age with either a prenatally diagnosed or shortly postnatally diagnosed localized mass, showing these patients can be observed with the expectation that the vast majority will avoid any type of surgical procedure. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:22
clinical The low risk neuroblastoma group, depending on the actual age of the patient and how it is diagnosed, could potentially be followed simply with observation. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical Patients with metastatic neuroblastoma typically receive four or five cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then are reassessed. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical If the tumor and metastatic disease are responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, one would attack the primary tumor site with a resection, with many advocating for attempting a greater than 90% resection. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical If the metastatic disease is progressing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, then surgery is not indicated. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow (specifically not bone, not cortical bone) and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical In patients with MS disease, simple observation can be the treatment path. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical If MS disease patients progress or develop respiratory issues because of an enlarging liver mass, treatment might be elected because of the complication of the size of the tumor, but the tumor itself usually does not have to be treated. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
quote MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow, specifically not bone, not cortical bone, and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:55
clinical You can biopsy the skin lesions in MS disease and that will give you the diagnosis. ↗

Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 2 · 2:00
clinical Adrenal hemorrhage is the most common cause of prenatal suprarenal mass, especially with history of fetal stress ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:24
clinical The GetNucturne study showed that prenatal/neonatal neuroblastomas can be safely observed with careful ultrasound surveillance, with many patients spared surgery ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:21
clinical Lymph node status in neuroblastoma does not change therapy, unlike Wilms tumor ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 22:12
clinical Approximately 10% of neuroblastomas are not MIBG-avid, which is when PET scan may be useful ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 43:17
clinical Tumor shrinkage in neuroblastoma plateaus after cycle 2-3 of chemotherapy per LaQuaglia and Von Allman studies ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 44:04
clinical COG high-risk study showed >90% resection improved event-free survival but not overall survival (approximately 245 patients) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 45:28
clinical European neuroblastoma group study (approximately 1000 cases) showed >90% resection improved both event-free survival and overall survival ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 46:10
epidemiological Approximately 70% of high-risk neuroblastoma patients can achieve >90% resection ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 50:54
clinical Neuroblastoma theoretically does not invade vessel adventitia, though invasion has been observed ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 51:30
quote There is zero correlation, zero. There is absolutely no correlation between the findings on post-op imaging and the findings that are reported in the op note. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 51:30
clinical There is zero correlation between surgeon operative note description of resection extent and post-operative imaging findings ↗
Daniel's statements about Aerodigestive / ENT 6 statements

Open the Aerodigestive / ENT collection →

Aerodigestive & Esophageal Surgery - Difficult Tracheal Esophageal Fistula

▶ Ep 3 · 9:58
clinical If a patient is aspirating from above (oropharyngeal or esophageal source), an anti-reflux procedure does not help and may make them worse. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 14:02
clinical Routine bronchoscopy is now standard practice for all type C TEF repairs at Cincinnati Children's, often done in collaboration with ENT colleagues. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 19:37
clinical Dual scoping (simultaneous bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy) allows scopes to 'shake hands' across a fistula, light transillumination through tissue, and injection of saline or air to reveal subtle openings. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 55:54
quote Button batteries are bad. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 56:27
quote The tissue damage extends beyond what you can appreciate with the naked eye, and the progression of it probably extends beyond what you would think is the normal time frame. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 1:52:36
clinical In a patient with multiple bronchoesophageal fistulas and chronic bronchiectasis, lobectomy with resection of the esophageal pseudo-diverticulum can be performed safely; the esophagus can be primarily closed if not strictured. ↗
Daniel's statements about Appendicitis 12 statements

Open the Appendicitis collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 4 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 7 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about Appendicitis 12 statements

Open the Appendicitis collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 5 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 10 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about Biliary Atresia 12 statements

Open the Biliary Atresia collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 6 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 10 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about CHARGE Syndrome 12 statements

Open the CHARGE Syndrome collection →

Aerodigestive & Esophageal Surgery - Difficult Tracheal Esophageal Fistula

▶ Ep 1 · 9:58
clinical If a patient is aspirating from above (oropharyngeal or esophageal source), an anti-reflux procedure does not help and may make them worse. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 9:58
clinical If a patient is aspirating from above (oropharyngeal or esophageal source), an anti-reflux procedure does not help and may make them worse. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 14:02
clinical Routine bronchoscopy is now standard practice for all type C TEF repairs at Cincinnati Children's, often done in collaboration with ENT colleagues. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 14:02
clinical Routine bronchoscopy is now standard practice for all type C TEF repairs at Cincinnati Children's, often done in collaboration with ENT colleagues. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 19:37
clinical Dual scoping (simultaneous bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy) allows scopes to 'shake hands' across a fistula, light transillumination through tissue, and injection of saline or air to reveal subtle openings. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 19:37
clinical Dual scoping (simultaneous bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy) allows scopes to 'shake hands' across a fistula, light transillumination through tissue, and injection of saline or air to reveal subtle openings. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 55:54
quote Button batteries are bad. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 55:54
quote Button batteries are bad. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 56:27
quote The tissue damage extends beyond what you can appreciate with the naked eye, and the progression of it probably extends beyond what you would think is the normal time frame. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 56:27
quote The tissue damage extends beyond what you can appreciate with the naked eye, and the progression of it probably extends beyond what you would think is the normal time frame. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:52:36
clinical In a patient with multiple bronchoesophageal fistulas and chronic bronchiectasis, lobectomy with resection of the esophageal pseudo-diverticulum can be performed safely; the esophagus can be primarily closed if not strictured. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:52:36
clinical In a patient with multiple bronchoesophageal fistulas and chronic bronchiectasis, lobectomy with resection of the esophageal pseudo-diverticulum can be performed safely; the esophagus can be primarily closed if not strictured. ↗
Daniel's statements about Colorectal / ARM & Hirschsprung 17 statements

Open the Colorectal / ARM & Hirschsprung collection →

Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 74 · 2:00
clinical Adrenal hemorrhage is the most common cause of prenatal suprarenal mass, especially with history of fetal stress ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 7:24
clinical The GetNucturne study showed that prenatal/neonatal neuroblastomas can be safely observed with careful ultrasound surveillance, with many patients spared surgery ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 14:21
clinical Lymph node status in neuroblastoma does not change therapy, unlike Wilms tumor ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 22:12
clinical Approximately 10% of neuroblastomas are not MIBG-avid, which is when PET scan may be useful ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 43:17
clinical Tumor shrinkage in neuroblastoma plateaus after cycle 2-3 of chemotherapy per LaQuaglia and Von Allman studies ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 44:04
clinical COG high-risk study showed >90% resection improved event-free survival but not overall survival (approximately 245 patients) ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 45:28
clinical European neuroblastoma group study (approximately 1000 cases) showed >90% resection improved both event-free survival and overall survival ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 46:10
epidemiological Approximately 70% of high-risk neuroblastoma patients can achieve >90% resection ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 50:54
clinical Neuroblastoma theoretically does not invade vessel adventitia, though invasion has been observed ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 51:30
clinical There is zero correlation between surgeon operative note description of resection extent and post-operative imaging findings ↗
▶ Ep 74 · 51:30
quote There is zero correlation, zero. There is absolutely no correlation between the findings on post-op imaging and the findings that are reported in the op note. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 76 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about Congenital Lung Lesions (CPAM) 30 statements

Open the Congenital Lung Lesions (CPAM) collection →

Complications and Beyond

▶ Ep 22 · 6:34
clinical Baseline chest X-ray may be useful if patient later presents with respiratory symptoms and consolidation, providing comparison ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 6:34
clinical Baseline chest X-ray may be useful if patient later presents with respiratory symptoms and consolidation, providing comparison ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 25:54
clinical If crura come together easily during paraesophageal hernia repair, primary closure without mesh is preferred ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 25:54
clinical If crura come together easily during paraesophageal hernia repair, primary closure without mesh is preferred ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 29:25
clinical Posterior defect is the usual problem site in paraesophageal hernia; mesh should cover the posterior repair ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 29:25
clinical Posterior defect is the usual problem site in paraesophageal hernia; mesh should cover the posterior repair ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 33:35
clinical Waiting only 3-4 weeks for revision risks operating during maximal inflammation period ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 33:35
clinical Waiting only 3-4 weeks for revision risks operating during maximal inflammation period ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 44:09
quote I hate this operation, whether it's open or laparoscopic, because you're trying to do a mechanical fix to a physiologic problem, and it's uh miserable. ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 44:09
opinion Fundoplication attempts mechanical fix for physiologic problem, making it inherently difficult operation ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 44:09
opinion Fundoplication attempts mechanical fix for physiologic problem, making it inherently difficult operation ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 44:09
quote I hate this operation, whether it's open or laparoscopic, because you're trying to do a mechanical fix to a physiologic problem, and it's uh miserable. ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 45:22
clinical Gastric disconnect is excellent operation in cognitively impaired patients who don't eat much and have refractory reflux or multiple failed fundoplications ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 45:22
clinical Gastric disconnect is excellent operation in cognitively impaired patients who don't eat much and have refractory reflux or multiple failed fundoplications ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 49:43
clinical Dextrocardia makes thoracoscopic visualization challenging for EA/TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 49:43
clinical Dextrocardia makes thoracoscopic visualization challenging for EA/TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 49:56
clinical For unstable EA/TEF patient, laparotomy with G-tube and vessel loop around GE junction allows fistula control and ventilation, deferring thoracic repair until patient stabilizes ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 49:56
clinical For unstable EA/TEF patient, laparotomy with G-tube and vessel loop around GE junction allows fistula control and ventilation, deferring thoracic repair until patient stabilizes ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 54:34
clinical Bronchoscopy should be performed in all EA/TEF cases to identify additional fistulas ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 54:34
clinical Bronchoscopy should be performed in all EA/TEF cases to identify additional fistulas ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 58:19
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung can be performed via median sternotomy: divide trachea, repair esophagus posteriorly, reconstruct trachea and fish-mouth abnormal bronchus to create lung connection ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 58:19
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung can be performed via median sternotomy: divide trachea, repair esophagus posteriorly, reconstruct trachea and fish-mouth abnormal bronchus to create lung connection ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 59:03
clinical If initial TEF ligation is performed too far from trachea (2cm), significant esophageal length is lost, potentially preventing primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 59:03
clinical If initial TEF ligation is performed too far from trachea (2cm), significant esophageal length is lost, potentially preventing primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 59:24
clinical Magnet anastomosis can be attempted when esophageal ends are tacked together but gap prevents primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 59:24
clinical Magnet anastomosis can be attempted when esophageal ends are tacked together but gap prevents primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 59:43
quote It'll be great if it works. ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 59:43
quote It'll be great if it works. ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 1:01:43
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung is performed on cardiopulmonary bypass ↗
▶ Ep 22 · 1:01:43
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung is performed on cardiopulmonary bypass ↗
Daniel's statements about Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation 15 statements

Open the Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation collection →

Complications and Beyond

▶ Ep 19 · 6:34
clinical Baseline chest X-ray may be useful if patient later presents with respiratory symptoms and consolidation, providing comparison ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 25:54
clinical If crura come together easily during paraesophageal hernia repair, primary closure without mesh is preferred ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 29:25
clinical Posterior defect is the usual problem site in paraesophageal hernia; mesh should cover the posterior repair ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 33:35
clinical Waiting only 3-4 weeks for revision risks operating during maximal inflammation period ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 44:09
opinion Fundoplication attempts mechanical fix for physiologic problem, making it inherently difficult operation ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 44:09
quote I hate this operation, whether it's open or laparoscopic, because you're trying to do a mechanical fix to a physiologic problem, and it's uh miserable. ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 45:22
clinical Gastric disconnect is excellent operation in cognitively impaired patients who don't eat much and have refractory reflux or multiple failed fundoplications ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 49:43
clinical Dextrocardia makes thoracoscopic visualization challenging for EA/TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 49:56
clinical For unstable EA/TEF patient, laparotomy with G-tube and vessel loop around GE junction allows fistula control and ventilation, deferring thoracic repair until patient stabilizes ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 54:34
clinical Bronchoscopy should be performed in all EA/TEF cases to identify additional fistulas ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 58:19
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung can be performed via median sternotomy: divide trachea, repair esophagus posteriorly, reconstruct trachea and fish-mouth abnormal bronchus to create lung connection ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 59:03
clinical If initial TEF ligation is performed too far from trachea (2cm), significant esophageal length is lost, potentially preventing primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 59:24
clinical Magnet anastomosis can be attempted when esophageal ends are tacked together but gap prevents primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 59:43
quote It'll be great if it works. ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 1:01:43
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung is performed on cardiopulmonary bypass ↗
Daniel's statements about Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation 15 statements

Open the Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation collection →

Complications and Beyond

▶ Ep 19 · 6:34
clinical Baseline chest X-ray may be useful if patient later presents with respiratory symptoms and consolidation, providing comparison ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 25:54
clinical If crura come together easily during paraesophageal hernia repair, primary closure without mesh is preferred ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 29:25
clinical Posterior defect is the usual problem site in paraesophageal hernia; mesh should cover the posterior repair ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 33:35
clinical Waiting only 3-4 weeks for revision risks operating during maximal inflammation period ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 44:09
opinion Fundoplication attempts mechanical fix for physiologic problem, making it inherently difficult operation ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 44:09
quote I hate this operation, whether it's open or laparoscopic, because you're trying to do a mechanical fix to a physiologic problem, and it's uh miserable. ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 45:22
clinical Gastric disconnect is excellent operation in cognitively impaired patients who don't eat much and have refractory reflux or multiple failed fundoplications ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 49:43
clinical Dextrocardia makes thoracoscopic visualization challenging for EA/TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 49:56
clinical For unstable EA/TEF patient, laparotomy with G-tube and vessel loop around GE junction allows fistula control and ventilation, deferring thoracic repair until patient stabilizes ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 54:34
clinical Bronchoscopy should be performed in all EA/TEF cases to identify additional fistulas ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 58:19
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung can be performed via median sternotomy: divide trachea, repair esophagus posteriorly, reconstruct trachea and fish-mouth abnormal bronchus to create lung connection ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 59:03
clinical If initial TEF ligation is performed too far from trachea (2cm), significant esophageal length is lost, potentially preventing primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 59:24
clinical Magnet anastomosis can be attempted when esophageal ends are tacked together but gap prevents primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 59:43
quote It'll be great if it works. ↗
▶ Ep 19 · 1:01:43
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung is performed on cardiopulmonary bypass ↗
Daniel's statements about Enterocolitis 45 statements

Open the Enterocolitis collection →

Hirschprung's Disease - Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 2 · 7:00
guideline Contrast enema plus suction rectal biopsy is the standard initial workup for newborn distal bowel obstruction suspected to be Hirschsprung disease, not upper GI series. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:00
clinical Laparoscopic-assisted pull-through is preferred over purely transanal approach because contrast enema underestimates transition zone level in approximately 8% of cases (Manu Proctor's data). ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 11:00
epidemiological Female patients may have higher incidence of long-segment Hirschsprung (50-50 ratio for total colonic aganglionosis in girls) compared to males. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 11:00
quote You don't want to be confused by the facts ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 12:00
quote I've been burned so many times by that, what looks like an obvious low transition zone and you end up just chasing it and chasing it ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:00
quote We actually published a paper of false positive contrast enemas in newborns. So there was a transition zone that looked like Hirschsprung's, and it was not Hirschprung. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:00
guideline Tissue diagnosis is mandatory before operating for Hirschsprung disease; contrast enema alone is insufficient due to false-positive transition zones in newborns. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:00
quote there is an occasional patient who is really sick from enterocolitis and you may not wanna wait for a tissue diagnosis. It might take a couple of days to get. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:00
clinical In sick patients with enterocolitis, diversion may be necessary before obtaining tissue diagnosis if pathology results will be delayed several days. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:00
clinical Ultra-short segment Hirschsprung has two definitions: (1) aganglionosis less than 5cm from dentate line, or (2) absent recto-anal inhibitory reflex with normal ganglion cells (internal sphincter achalasia). The latter is not true Hirschsprung disease. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:00
quote There are two definitions for ultra short segment Hirschmann's disease that people use, and these kinds of discussions get get foiled because one person's using one definition, another person's using another one. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:00
clinical Manometry showing normal recto-anal inhibitory reflex rules out Hirschsprung disease in older cooperative children (age 5-6+); if reflex is absent, biopsy is still required due to false-negative manometry. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:00
quote if there's a normal reflex. Uh-huh. Now, if they don't have a normal reflex, then, then you have to biopsy them because the, the, there can be false, false, whatever you want, I don't know, negative, positive, false absence of the of the reflex ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:00
quote it's hard for me to imagine how Doctor Pena could not believe in that. You know, why would there be a disease where there's a minimum of 5 centimeters of a ganglionosis? ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 20:00
clinical Hypertrophic nerves on biopsy indicate Hirschsprung disease; they should not be present in normal anal canal biopsies even though ganglion cells are normally absent in the anal canal. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:00
clinical The anal canal in adults is 3-4 centimeters long (versus 1cm in infants), so biopsies at 3cm in a 16-year-old may actually be sampling anal canal rather than rectum. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:00
clinical Cecal perforation in Hirschsprung disease usually occurs with shorter-segment disease (not total colonic aganglionosis) because the cecum becomes most distended, similar to rectal cancer causing cecal perforation. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:00
clinical For cecal perforation from Hirschsprung: close the perforation, create loop ileostomy, and perform serial colonic biopsies if patient is stable to identify transition zone level. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:00
quote the cecum gets more distended and pops. So, uh, I would close the cecal perforation, bring out a loop ileostomy, and if the baby was stable enough, I would do some serial biopsies in the colon ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 26:00
clinical Long-segment Hirschsprung patients should wait 6-12 months after diversion before definitive pull-through to allow stoma output to thicken and prevent severe perianal excoriation. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 26:00
quote I tend to wait longer in long segment disease because they have terrible perianal excoriation if you, if you pull them through too early. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:00
opinion When transition zone is in the cecum or ascending colon, pulling down the cecum as a pouch leads to stasis and enterocolitis; ileal Duhamel (sacrificing the cecum) may have better outcomes. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:00
quote my experience with, um, with a very, very short pull, pull through like using the cecum essentially have not been very good. So in general, when I'm faced with that anatomy, I just do a, treat it like total colon disease and I do an ileal duhamel. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:00
clinical If transition zone is at hepatic flexure or beyond, preserve the colon; if only cecum is ganglionic, consider ileal Duhamel instead. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:00
quote when it's just the cecum, it's, it's this big bag of stuff, and, and they end up with a lot of stasis and enterocolitis. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 32:00
clinical Suction rectal biopsy should not be performed in children older than approximately 15-18 months due to patient cooperation issues; open rectal biopsy under general anesthesia is preferred. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 33:00
quote you gotta, even though you might, the, the specimen may come out, the logistics of taking a 2 year old and, uh, holding them they can fight back. They're too old. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:00
clinical In older children (age 3+) with severely dilated colon from Hirschsprung, primary pull-through without diversion risks anastomotic complications; leveling colostomy with resection of dilated segment is preferred. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:00
quote We've been really leaning towards doing diversion after just to protect our anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:30
quote if we do this, take the, try to resect these colons transanally. The stretch that we put on the sphincter is enormous, and their, uh, continence postoperatively is definitely, definitely suffers. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 35:00
quote that thing that you showed, um, is so mammothly dilated, I don't think that would close. That's why I was initially going to say, Divert, but I think that that's not going to come down no matter how long you wait. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:00
clinical Massively dilated colon in older Hirschsprung patients may shrink after 6-8 months of diversion in younger children (age 3) but is less likely to shrink in adolescents (age 17). ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:00
quote I have had success in, uh, getting that distal bowel to, uh, shrink in size. Um-hum. With the stoma for 6 or 8 months. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:30
quote the older the kid, the less likely that it's going to shrink down in size. But, uh, at this age OK. Uh, I think it will. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:00
quote patient was at a well-known institution in Ohio. And had, was seen by GI and had multiple biopsies that were normal. Those were done by colonoscopy, um, and then, so the chart read no Hirschprung's disease ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:00
clinical Colonoscopic biopsies for Hirschsprung diagnosis in older children can be unreliable and miss the diagnosis; full-thickness rectal biopsy is more reliable. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:00
quote just caution to watch out what type of biopsy was performed and how Hirschprung's was ruled out. It's, it's an argument for the manometry uh diagnosis because biopsies in an older child can be unreliable. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:00
clinical Initial management of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis: IV broad-spectrum antibiotics and saline rectal irrigations. Consider diversion only if patient has peritonitis, sepsis, or SIRS. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
quote we actually published a, uh, that Botox decreased the number of hospitalizations for enterocolitis in, in those children. It doesn't always work, though. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
clinical Chronic oral metronidazole is used liberally for recurrent Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, sometimes for months; symptoms may recur when medication is stopped. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
quote we have a lot of kids on chronic, uh, metronidazole. And when they, you know, they can be on it for three months and then you try taking them off and they start getting symptoms again. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
clinical Botox injection decreases the number of hospitalizations for enterocolitis in post-pull-through Hirschsprung patients, though it does not work in all cases. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:00
quote The incidence of enterocolitis is significantly higher in children with trisomy 21, as much as double the incidence in genetically normal kids. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:00
epidemiological Incidence of enterocolitis is significantly higher (approximately double) in children with trisomy 21 compared to genetically normal children with Hirschsprung disease. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 40:00
clinical For recurrent enterocolitis post-pull-through: perform exam under anesthesia with biopsies to rule out residual aganglionosis or distal obstruction before treating the enterocolitis itself. ↗
Daniel's statements about Enterocolitis 45 statements

Open the Enterocolitis collection →

Hirschprung's Disease - Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 2 · 7:00
guideline Contrast enema plus suction rectal biopsy is the standard initial workup for newborn distal bowel obstruction suspected to be Hirschsprung disease, not upper GI series. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:00
clinical Laparoscopic-assisted pull-through is preferred over purely transanal approach because contrast enema underestimates transition zone level in approximately 8% of cases (Manu Proctor's data). ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 11:00
epidemiological Female patients may have higher incidence of long-segment Hirschsprung (50-50 ratio for total colonic aganglionosis in girls) compared to males. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 11:00
quote You don't want to be confused by the facts ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 12:00
quote I've been burned so many times by that, what looks like an obvious low transition zone and you end up just chasing it and chasing it ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:00
guideline Tissue diagnosis is mandatory before operating for Hirschsprung disease; contrast enema alone is insufficient due to false-positive transition zones in newborns. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:00
quote We actually published a paper of false positive contrast enemas in newborns. So there was a transition zone that looked like Hirschsprung's, and it was not Hirschprung. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:00
quote there is an occasional patient who is really sick from enterocolitis and you may not wanna wait for a tissue diagnosis. It might take a couple of days to get. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:00
clinical In sick patients with enterocolitis, diversion may be necessary before obtaining tissue diagnosis if pathology results will be delayed several days. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:00
quote There are two definitions for ultra short segment Hirschmann's disease that people use, and these kinds of discussions get get foiled because one person's using one definition, another person's using another one. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:00
clinical Ultra-short segment Hirschsprung has two definitions: (1) aganglionosis less than 5cm from dentate line, or (2) absent recto-anal inhibitory reflex with normal ganglion cells (internal sphincter achalasia). The latter is not true Hirschsprung disease. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:00
clinical Manometry showing normal recto-anal inhibitory reflex rules out Hirschsprung disease in older cooperative children (age 5-6+); if reflex is absent, biopsy is still required due to false-negative manometry. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:00
quote if there's a normal reflex. Uh-huh. Now, if they don't have a normal reflex, then, then you have to biopsy them because the, the, there can be false, false, whatever you want, I don't know, negative, positive, false absence of the of the reflex ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:00
quote it's hard for me to imagine how Doctor Pena could not believe in that. You know, why would there be a disease where there's a minimum of 5 centimeters of a ganglionosis? ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 20:00
clinical Hypertrophic nerves on biopsy indicate Hirschsprung disease; they should not be present in normal anal canal biopsies even though ganglion cells are normally absent in the anal canal. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:00
clinical The anal canal in adults is 3-4 centimeters long (versus 1cm in infants), so biopsies at 3cm in a 16-year-old may actually be sampling anal canal rather than rectum. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:00
clinical Cecal perforation in Hirschsprung disease usually occurs with shorter-segment disease (not total colonic aganglionosis) because the cecum becomes most distended, similar to rectal cancer causing cecal perforation. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:00
clinical For cecal perforation from Hirschsprung: close the perforation, create loop ileostomy, and perform serial colonic biopsies if patient is stable to identify transition zone level. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:00
quote the cecum gets more distended and pops. So, uh, I would close the cecal perforation, bring out a loop ileostomy, and if the baby was stable enough, I would do some serial biopsies in the colon ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 26:00
quote I tend to wait longer in long segment disease because they have terrible perianal excoriation if you, if you pull them through too early. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 26:00
clinical Long-segment Hirschsprung patients should wait 6-12 months after diversion before definitive pull-through to allow stoma output to thicken and prevent severe perianal excoriation. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:00
opinion When transition zone is in the cecum or ascending colon, pulling down the cecum as a pouch leads to stasis and enterocolitis; ileal Duhamel (sacrificing the cecum) may have better outcomes. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:00
quote my experience with, um, with a very, very short pull, pull through like using the cecum essentially have not been very good. So in general, when I'm faced with that anatomy, I just do a, treat it like total colon disease and I do an ileal duhamel. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:00
quote when it's just the cecum, it's, it's this big bag of stuff, and, and they end up with a lot of stasis and enterocolitis. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:00
clinical If transition zone is at hepatic flexure or beyond, preserve the colon; if only cecum is ganglionic, consider ileal Duhamel instead. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 32:00
clinical Suction rectal biopsy should not be performed in children older than approximately 15-18 months due to patient cooperation issues; open rectal biopsy under general anesthesia is preferred. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 33:00
quote you gotta, even though you might, the, the specimen may come out, the logistics of taking a 2 year old and, uh, holding them they can fight back. They're too old. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:00
clinical In older children (age 3+) with severely dilated colon from Hirschsprung, primary pull-through without diversion risks anastomotic complications; leveling colostomy with resection of dilated segment is preferred. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:00
quote We've been really leaning towards doing diversion after just to protect our anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:30
quote if we do this, take the, try to resect these colons transanally. The stretch that we put on the sphincter is enormous, and their, uh, continence postoperatively is definitely, definitely suffers. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 35:00
quote that thing that you showed, um, is so mammothly dilated, I don't think that would close. That's why I was initially going to say, Divert, but I think that that's not going to come down no matter how long you wait. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:00
quote I have had success in, uh, getting that distal bowel to, uh, shrink in size. Um-hum. With the stoma for 6 or 8 months. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:00
clinical Massively dilated colon in older Hirschsprung patients may shrink after 6-8 months of diversion in younger children (age 3) but is less likely to shrink in adolescents (age 17). ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:30
quote the older the kid, the less likely that it's going to shrink down in size. But, uh, at this age OK. Uh, I think it will. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:00
clinical Colonoscopic biopsies for Hirschsprung diagnosis in older children can be unreliable and miss the diagnosis; full-thickness rectal biopsy is more reliable. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:00
quote patient was at a well-known institution in Ohio. And had, was seen by GI and had multiple biopsies that were normal. Those were done by colonoscopy, um, and then, so the chart read no Hirschprung's disease ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:00
quote just caution to watch out what type of biopsy was performed and how Hirschprung's was ruled out. It's, it's an argument for the manometry uh diagnosis because biopsies in an older child can be unreliable. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:00
clinical Initial management of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis: IV broad-spectrum antibiotics and saline rectal irrigations. Consider diversion only if patient has peritonitis, sepsis, or SIRS. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
quote we have a lot of kids on chronic, uh, metronidazole. And when they, you know, they can be on it for three months and then you try taking them off and they start getting symptoms again. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
clinical Chronic oral metronidazole is used liberally for recurrent Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, sometimes for months; symptoms may recur when medication is stopped. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
clinical Botox injection decreases the number of hospitalizations for enterocolitis in post-pull-through Hirschsprung patients, though it does not work in all cases. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:50
quote we actually published a, uh, that Botox decreased the number of hospitalizations for enterocolitis in, in those children. It doesn't always work, though. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:00
epidemiological Incidence of enterocolitis is significantly higher (approximately double) in children with trisomy 21 compared to genetically normal children with Hirschsprung disease. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:00
quote The incidence of enterocolitis is significantly higher in children with trisomy 21, as much as double the incidence in genetically normal kids. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 40:00
clinical For recurrent enterocolitis post-pull-through: perform exam under anesthesia with biopsies to rule out residual aganglionosis or distal obstruction before treating the enterocolitis itself. ↗
Daniel's statements about Esophageal Atresia 344 statements

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Aerodigestive & Esophageal Surgery - Difficult Tracheal Esophageal Fistula

▶ Ep 9 · 9:58
clinical If a patient is aspirating from above (oropharyngeal or esophageal source), an anti-reflux procedure does not help and may make them worse. ↗
▶ Ep 9 · 14:02
clinical Routine bronchoscopy is now standard practice for all type C TEF repairs at Cincinnati Children's, often done in collaboration with ENT colleagues. ↗
▶ Ep 9 · 19:37
clinical Dual scoping (simultaneous bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy) allows scopes to 'shake hands' across a fistula, light transillumination through tissue, and injection of saline or air to reveal subtle openings. ↗
▶ Ep 9 · 55:54
quote Button batteries are bad. ↗
▶ Ep 9 · 56:27
quote The tissue damage extends beyond what you can appreciate with the naked eye, and the progression of it probably extends beyond what you would think is the normal time frame. ↗
▶ Ep 9 · 1:52:36
clinical In a patient with multiple bronchoesophageal fistulas and chronic bronchiectasis, lobectomy with resection of the esophageal pseudo-diverticulum can be performed safely; the esophagus can be primarily closed if not strictured. ↗

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 11 · 1:36
quote It certainly is an interest that we have here with a whole group here in Cincinnati, but it can be an incredibly difficult, challenging problem. It's one of the great cases in pediatric surgery and one of the most difficult cases, so it really runs the whole spectrum for sure. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 2:01
clinical Cincinnati Children's has a multidisciplinary aerodigestive center that includes ENT airway surgeons, GI, pulmonary, general surgeons, nurse practitioners, geneticists, and dietitians ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 2:46
clinical The aerodigestive center typically receives more complicated patients referred from outside through either esophageal or airway pathways ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 3:55
clinical Physical examination findings in suspected esophageal atresia include assessment for scaphoid versus distended abdomen and respiratory distress ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 4:20
clinical Personal confirmation of NG tube passage is important as some patients started on treatment for esophageal atresia are later found to have tubes that pass normally ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 4:20
quote I personally like to try to pass the NG tube myself, having been burned with NG tubes that wouldn't go down, and the patient was started on treatment as an oesophageal atresia and subsequently found that the NG tube passes just fine. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 4:55
clinical Injecting air into the NG tube and obtaining a plain film helps visualize the proximal pouch and assess GI tract gas pattern ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 5:10
quote If I can't see a distended proximal pouch, then I worry. I worry that either one of two things either that the diagnosis is incorrect and in fact it is not an esophageal atresia, or that there could be a proximal fistula which is allowing that proximal pouch to decompress. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 5:10
clinical Lack of visible distended proximal pouch on plain film raises concern for either incorrect diagnosis or presence of proximal fistula allowing pouch decompression ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 5:42
clinical Contrast studies can be performed when there is high suspicion of anatomic variants, with no contraindication as long as radiologist is aware of potential obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 6:25
clinical Preoperative echocardiogram is essential to assess cardiac anatomy and rule out right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 6:54
clinical Renal ultrasound and spine evaluation for tethered cord are needed but are elective and not necessary before addressing esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 7:27
guideline Conventional wisdom for right-sided aortic arch is to perform left thoracotomy rather than right thoracotomy ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 7:27
quote I think that faced with that, that's what I would do if, if the echo was pretty clear and suggest that there's a right sided aortic arch, I would probably approach it through a left thoracotomy. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 7:51
clinical Left thoracotomy for right-sided arch is somewhat more difficult with heart more in the way and harder proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 8:20
clinical It is possible to complete the repair from right thoracotomy even with right-sided arch, though some reports suggest higher incidence of swallowing problems ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 8:20
quote I think that in most cases it is possible to get the esophagus together and to have a good result. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 9:31
quote I think that in a larger baby who's stable from a respiratory standpoint, not intubated in particular, I think it's perfectly legitimate to wait until you have all the resources that you would have in the middle of the day ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 9:31
clinical In stable larger babies not intubated, it is reasonable to wait until all resources are available in the middle of the day, even waiting until the next day ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 9:56
clinical Prolonged delay should be avoided due to concern for colonizing GI tract and soiling lungs ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 10:15
quote I've not found personally that an oscillator makes a whole lot of difference. I think if the child has a, has a large fistula, and typically it's actually, I believe this tends to be a bigger problem in younger, that is more premature infants who have more significant lung disease ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 10:15
clinical Oscillator ventilation has not been found to make significant difference in managing unstable TEF patients ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 10:35
clinical Air preferentially entering GI tract versus lungs tends to be a bigger problem in more premature infants with significant lung disease and poor lung compliance ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 10:56
clinical Treating with surfactant and improving lung compliance helps as much as changing ventilator type in managing air leak through fistula ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 11:21
quote I think one of the risks is to wait too long to make a decision, and I've made that mistake myself, and then it becomes an emergency if you can't ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 11:21
clinical Risk of waiting too long to make a decision in deteriorating patient can lead to emergency situation where ventilation becomes impossible ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 11:40
clinical For reasonably stable but worsening patient, approach is urgent right thoracotomy with fistula ligation ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 12:00
clinical Bronchoscopic placement of Fogarty balloon in fistula is difficult unless expertise and equipment are immediately available ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 12:25
clinical G-tube decompression may paradoxically worsen ventilation by making stomach lower resistance path, allowing more air to go there rather than to lungs ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 12:25
quote Decompressing the stomach may just allow that to become, in effect, the even lower resistance and allow more air to go there, making it even more difficult to ventilate. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 12:50
clinical Laparotomy with vessel loop around esophagogastric junction at hiatus with gentle traction (Rommel tourniquet technique) can temporize unstable patient for several days ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 13:51
clinical In stable child with associated duodenal atresia, consider fixing duodenal atresia first to avoid repairing esophagus upstream from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 14:13
clinical Both esophageal and duodenal atresia can potentially be repaired in same operative setting if child is stable enough ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 14:13
quote I think that our pediatric anesthesia has gotten good enough and if the child is old enough and stable enough you could potentially do both procedures at the same time. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 14:35
clinical Routine intraoperative bronchoscopy is important to document fistula location, assess for proximal fistula, and rule out laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 14:55
quote The airway surgeons here have convinced me that it is really important to do a bronchoscopy ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 15:10
quote we have seen that many times in patients who are referred who've had multiple thoracotomies. Nobody ever did a bronchoscopy and the child actually has a laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 15:10
clinical Laryngeal clefts are easily missed and have been seen many times in referred patients who had multiple thoracotomies without anyone doing bronchoscopy ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 15:30
epidemiological Second fistulas are very uncommon, occurring in perhaps 1% of cases, and can be difficult to diagnose ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 15:52
clinical High fistulas can be seen bronchoscopically ahead of time and range from trifurcation of carina to fistulas potentially approachable through the neck ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 16:35
clinical Bronchoscopy allows guidance of anesthesiologist for ET tube placement relative to fistula location ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 17:00
clinical For fistula at carina (trifurcation), ET tube should be placed higher as it cannot pass the fistula; for high fistula, tube should be placed distal to fistula ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 17:16
clinical Extrapleural approach offers advantage of potentially limiting soilage of pleural space if there is postoperative leak ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 17:16
quote I do an extra plural approach and that's the way I was trained. I think it offers the advantage of potentially limiting any soilage of the plural space if there is a leak postoperatively. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 17:41
quote I think there's no morbidity associated with that, so dividing the azygus gives you better access. In fact, frequently will guide you to the fistula. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 17:41
clinical Dividing azygos vein has no morbidity and gives better access, frequently guiding to the fistula ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 17:59
clinical For open repair, azygos is typically ligated and divided with suture ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 19:35
clinical Spreading intercostal muscles with heel of right angle on ribs nicely shows extrapleural plane ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 20:00
clinical Mobilizing pleura up around apex of lung is important to have access for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 20:24
clinical Distal esophageal segment is controlled with vessel loop to allow proximal dissection to identify fistula ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 21:10
quote I think we have learned that, you know, the standard teaching has been that you shouldn't mobilize the distal esophagus at all, and I think we've learned that in fact you can mobilize that segment a fair amount, especially laterally. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 21:10
clinical Standard teaching has been not to mobilize distal esophagus, but it can be mobilized extensively laterally and to some degree medially with care for blood supply ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 21:40
clinical Extensive proximal pouch mobilization is most important for gaining length to approximate the ends ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 22:20
quote I completely agree, and I think that you have to be very careful. I personally like to just use a blade, electric cautery and with a little buzz and then mostly blunt dissection with the flat end of the blade ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 22:20
clinical Blade electrocautery with light buzz and mostly blunt dissection with flat end of blade, staying right on thickened obstructed esophagus, is preferred technique for proximal dissection ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 22:40
quote I would rather be in the esophagus than be in the trachea up high in the chest. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 22:44
clinical Better to be in esophagus than in trachea high in chest during proximal dissection ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 22:51
clinical Large tracheal defect would require sleeve resection, with trachea being incredibly mobile, and placement of pericardium or autologous tissue between trachea and esophageal repair ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 23:15
quote The trachea is incredibly mobile. Another thing that I have learned from my ENT colleagues so that you could effectively do a slide to pull the distal trachea up to the proximal portion to cover that defect. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 23:59
opinion Personal preference is 5-0 PDS for anastomosis, favoring absorbable monofilament over silk or other sutures ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 23:59
quote I personally use PDS. I probably use 50 PDS. I like absorbable suture. I like monofilament suture. I'm not a big fan of silk ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 24:42
opinion Circular myotomies are not favored as they potentially create even more dysfunctional esophageal segment in patients who already have abnormal motility ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 24:50
quote I personally am not a big fan of myotomy. I think it. Potentially creates an even more dysfunctional segment of the esophagus than already exists. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 25:10
clinical For long-gap cases, approach is to ligate ends, tack both on tension to prevertebral fascia, close, let patient grow for several weeks, then return for anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 25:10
quote my approach to this is usually if I really try and I think it's going to be way too tight. Then I would ligate the ends, ligate the distal end after dividing the fistula, and then tack both ends on some tension to the prevertebral fascia, close and let the patient grow for a couple of weeks ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 25:38
quote I believe very firmly in the physiology of traction or pressure. Actually it's sort of the reverse, is a very strong stimulus to growth all over the place in the cardiovascular system in the lungs ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 25:38
clinical Traction or pressure is a strong stimulus to growth throughout the body including cardiovascular system and lungs ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 26:00
clinical Internal Foker technique uses traction sutures in proximal and distal ends brought out through crossed trocar sites with tension, allowing rapid lengthening within about a week ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 27:38
epidemiological Boston series by Jennings and Foker showed 98% success getting ends together in primary atresia versus only 67% in secondary cases after previous surgeries ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 27:38
quote the data are striking if you Have a patient who has a primary atresia that you address, then in 98% of patients they're able to get the two ends of the esophagus together. In contrast, if it's a patient who's had previous surgeries and it's a secondary approach, then only 2/3 of those patients ever get the esophagus together. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 28:10
clinical Foker technique requires patients to be intubated and paralyzed, spending weeks in ICU, which is significant cost but may be worth it for good result ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 29:18
clinical For thoracoscopic approach, patient is rotated past 90 degrees to allow gravity to move lungs out of the way ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 29:40
clinical Standard thoracoscopic port placement uses camera in center with posterior port inferiorly and anterior port superiorly ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 29:52
clinical 3mm instruments are used for thoracoscopic TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 30:10
clinical Thoracoscopic visualization is very helpful for mobilizing proximal pouch ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 30:10
quote I think it's important to do the same operation or at least the same quality operation that you would do open and Frankly, I think that's one of the challenges with the thoracoscopic repair of a TEF is to actually sew the anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 30:30
clinical Anastomosis is the most difficult part of thoracoscopic repair, requiring significant experience with minimally invasive suturing techniques ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 31:00
opinion Clips are preferred for dividing fistula thoracoscopically, with less concern about them falling off esophagus than blood vessels ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 31:00
quote I'm less worried about them falling off the esophagus than I am having them fall off a blood vessel. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 31:21
clinical Hook electrocautery can safely divide vessels if used carefully with up-and-down motion ensuring coagulation ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 31:21
quote It is amazing what you can divide with the electric cautery, with the hook electric cautery if you just get used to it ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 31:50
opinion 3mm surgical sealer is ideal device for this size patient and vessel size ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 31:50
quote I think the 3 millimeter sealer is a, is a great device for this size patient and that size vessel. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 32:00
clinical Hanging stitch technique (first stitch brought out of chest) helps line up anastomosis similar to duodenal atresia repair ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 33:54
clinical Hanging stitch helps release tension as first stitches are placed and allows visualization of mucosa in both proximal and distal lumens ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 33:54
quote To me, the important part, and I beat on our residents about this when they're doing this anastomosis, is you have to be able to see. You want to make sure that you incorporate mucosa on every stitch ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 34:15
clinical Incorporating mucosa on every stitch is critical and easier to verify with thoracoscopic visualization ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 34:23
clinical Ventilator management is more dependent on anesthesiologist comfort and attention than ventilator type ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 34:23
quote I think it's more dependent on the anesthesiologist than it is on the type of ventilator, and you have to have an anesthesiologist who's comfortable with doing this and understands what you're trying to accomplish ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 34:45
clinical Anesthesiologist must understand goals and pay attention during operation, as they can significantly help or hurt with ventilation approach ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 35:20
clinical Little CO2 insufflation with time will collapse lung as long as anesthesiologist is not fighting with positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 35:58
clinical Concern about reintubation is balanced by greater concern that positive pressure puts pressure on tracheal repair ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 35:58
quote I agree it is a concern that the patient may require reintubation. However, I'm equally concerned that positive pressure is putting pressure on my tracheal repair ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 36:15
quote I would much rather have the patient be breathing spontaneously to have, in fact, the opposite effect of a negative pressure in the trachea. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 36:15
clinical Spontaneous breathing creates negative pressure in trachea, which is preferable to positive pressure on repair ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 36:34
clinical For patients with good preoperative lung function and smooth operation, advocate extubating as soon as possible, even in operating room ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 36:43
clinical Contrast esophagram is obtained at 5-7 days postoperatively before pulling chest drain ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 36:43
quote I do honestly, I'm a little bit old school in that. I still get an esophagram. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 37:15
clinical Small TLS drains are used rather than formal chest tube, especially for open extrapleural approach ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 37:20
clinical Trans-anastomotic tubes are not used based on Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study showing much higher stricture and leak rates with their use ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 37:20
quote I do not actually. I again, a practice of mine that has changed based on our results from the Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study in which the patients who Had a trans anastomotic tube had a much higher stricture and leak rate ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 37:53
clinical Unless stricture is incredibly tight, would wait several weeks before first dilation to avoid complete obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 38:15
clinical Proximal pouch is always dilated so there is always reported narrowing at anastomosis; as long as contrast flows freely distally, can wait on dilation ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 38:15
quote there's always reported a narrowing because the proximal pouch is always dilated, so it always looks like there's a narrowing at the anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 38:40
clinical Fairly aggressive dilation approach: dilate, wait 1-2 weeks, restudy, potentially dilate again ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 39:00
clinical If case goes well and post-op study looks great, do not get routine follow-up esophagrams; study only based on clinical symptoms suggesting stricture ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 39:21
quote I think that again, having trained using bougie dilators, a balloon or radial dilation is, is less traumatic for the tissue ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 39:21
clinical Balloon or radial dilation is less traumatic to tissue than bougie dilators ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 39:44
quote I would absolutely wait and do nothing. I would leave the drain in and usually that presents with some saliva in the drain, and I would just wait, and the vast majority of those close. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 39:44
clinical For small leak in non-sick child, absolutely wait and do nothing, leaving drain in place; vast majority close spontaneously ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 40:09
clinical Indications for operative intervention for leak are child getting sicker, wide open leak, or large uncontrollable pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 40:34
clinical Even reasonably significant leaks will heal, then stricture can be dealt with postoperatively ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 40:40
clinical Typically wait one week between esophagrams for leak, though timing is somewhat arbitrary ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 41:11
opinion Pediatric surgeons do not do a fantastic job of long-term follow-up with TEF patients ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 41:11
quote I think that first of all I would make the comment that that's a great point and it's interesting to participate in the International oesophageal atresia. A meeting that occurs every 2 years and to go and see the patients because that meeting is multidisciplinary, including even patients, and you see these patients who come back who are in their 20s or 30s or 40s and they talk about the long term issues that they have and we tend to follow patients until they're, you know, until they're eating well and then they're gone ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 41:30
clinical International esophageal atresia meetings show patients in their 20s-40s with long-term issues that surgeons are unaware of because patients are lost after age 18 ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 42:15
opinion Personal practice is to follow patients for at least a couple years, which is probably not long enough ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 42:30
quote The patients that worry me more honestly are the patients who have ongoing reflux, and we don't know the long term impact of that on things like Barrett's esophagus and Potential long term risk for malignant change ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 42:30
opinion Patients with ongoing reflux are more concerning than those with recurrent strictures due to unknown long-term impact on Barrett's esophagus and malignant change risk ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 42:45
clinical Most patients are discharged on anti-reflux medications ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 42:55
clinical Virtually all TEF patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 42:55
quote I would argue that virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux. ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 43:10
clinical After 2-3 dilations for recurrent stricture, next move is to address reflux with fundoplication ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 43:10
quote I personally am very aggressive about doing a fundoplication on those patients ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 43:26
clinical For patients with poor esophageal motility, still perform Nissen but make it loose and short using 2 or at most 3 stitches ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 43:56
clinical For pure esophageal atresia, approach is G-tube placement with gap calibration using distal catheter and proximal NG tube ↗
▶ Ep 11 · 44:20
clinical Wait 4-6 weeks to see how close ends come together, then attempt primary repair once within 2 vertebral bodies ↗

Complications and Beyond

▶ Ep 2 · 6:34
clinical Baseline chest X-ray may be useful if patient later presents with respiratory symptoms and consolidation, providing comparison ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 25:54
clinical If crura come together easily during paraesophageal hernia repair, primary closure without mesh is preferred ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:25
clinical Posterior defect is the usual problem site in paraesophageal hernia; mesh should cover the posterior repair ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 33:35
clinical Waiting only 3-4 weeks for revision risks operating during maximal inflammation period ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 44:09
quote I hate this operation, whether it's open or laparoscopic, because you're trying to do a mechanical fix to a physiologic problem, and it's uh miserable. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 44:09
opinion Fundoplication attempts mechanical fix for physiologic problem, making it inherently difficult operation ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 45:22
clinical Gastric disconnect is excellent operation in cognitively impaired patients who don't eat much and have refractory reflux or multiple failed fundoplications ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 49:43
clinical Dextrocardia makes thoracoscopic visualization challenging for EA/TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 49:56
clinical For unstable EA/TEF patient, laparotomy with G-tube and vessel loop around GE junction allows fistula control and ventilation, deferring thoracic repair until patient stabilizes ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 54:34
clinical Bronchoscopy should be performed in all EA/TEF cases to identify additional fistulas ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 58:19
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung can be performed via median sternotomy: divide trachea, repair esophagus posteriorly, reconstruct trachea and fish-mouth abnormal bronchus to create lung connection ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 59:03
clinical If initial TEF ligation is performed too far from trachea (2cm), significant esophageal length is lost, potentially preventing primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 59:24
clinical Magnet anastomosis can be attempted when esophageal ends are tacked together but gap prevents primary anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 59:43
quote It'll be great if it works. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 1:01:43
clinical Tracheal reconstruction for esophageal lung is performed on cardiopulmonary bypass ↗

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 26 · 1:36
quote It certainly is an interest that we have here with a whole group here in Cincinnati, but it can be an incredibly difficult, challenging problem. It's one of the great cases in pediatric surgery and one of the most difficult cases, so it really runs the whole spectrum for sure. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 2:01
clinical Cincinnati Children's has a multidisciplinary aerodigestive center including ENT airway surgeons, GI, pulmonary, general surgeons, nurse practitioners, geneticists, and dietitians ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 2:46
clinical The aerodigestive center typically receives more complicated patients referred from outside through either esophageal or airway arms ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 3:55
clinical Physical examination should assess for scaphoid versus full or distended abdomen and respiratory distress ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 4:20
clinical The surgeon should personally attempt to pass the NG tube rather than relying on nursing reports, as tubes reported as not passing sometimes pass easily ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 4:20
quote I personally like to try to pass the NG tube myself, having been burned with NG tubes that wouldn't go down, and the patient was started on treatment as an oesophageal atresia and subsequently found that the NG tube passes just fine. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 4:55
clinical Injecting air into the NG tube and obtaining a plain film helps visualize proximal pouch distention and assess distal GI gas pattern ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 5:01
clinical Lack of visible distended proximal pouch raises concern for either incorrect diagnosis or presence of proximal fistula allowing pouch decompression ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 5:01
quote If I can't see a distended proximal pouch, then I worry. I worry that either one of two things either that the diagnosis is incorrect and in fact it is not an esophageal atresia, or that there could be a proximal fistula which is allowing that proximal pouch to decompress. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 5:42
clinical Contrast studies can be performed if there is high suspicion of unusual anatomy, as long as the radiologist knows the esophagus may be obstructed ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 6:25
clinical Echocardiogram is the most important preoperative study to assess cardiac anatomy and rule out right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 6:25
quote The most important one prior to taking the patient to the operating room is to get an echocardiogram, and the utility of that is, is obviously to assess the cardiac anatomy, but more as importantly, I would say is to assess to be sure that the patient does not have a right-sided aortic arch. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 6:54
clinical Renal ultrasound and spine evaluation for tethered cord are needed but are elective and not necessary before addressing esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 7:27
guideline Conventional wisdom is to perform left thoracotomy for right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 7:51
clinical Left thoracotomy for right-sided arch is somewhat more difficult with the heart more in the way and harder proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 8:20
clinical It is possible to complete the repair from the right side if right-sided arch is discovered intraoperatively, though some reports suggest higher incidence of swallowing problems ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 9:31
clinical In a stable larger baby not intubated, it is reasonable to wait until all resources are available in the middle of the day, even waiting 1-2 days ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 9:56
clinical Should not wait a long time before repair due to risk of colonizing GI tract and soiling lungs ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 10:15
opinion Oscillator ventilation does not make a significant difference in managing large fistulas with abdominal distention ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 10:15
clinical Large fistula with distention tends to be a bigger problem in more premature infants with significant lung disease, where poor lung compliance drives air into GI tract ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 10:15
quote I've not found personally that an oscillator makes a whole lot of difference. I think if the child has a, has a large fistula, and typically it's actually, I believe this tends to be a bigger problem in younger, that is more premature infants who have more significant lung disease, and their compliance of their lungs is really what drives the The air into the GI tract as opposed to into the lungs. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 10:56
clinical Treating with surfactant and improving lung compliance helps as much as changing ventilator type ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 11:21
clinical Risk of waiting too long to make a decision in worsening distention can lead to emergency situation where child cannot be ventilated ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 11:21
quote I think this is a difficult clinical scenario, and, and I think one of the risks is to wait too long to make a decision, and I've made that mistake myself, and then it becomes an emergency if you can't ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 12:00
opinion Bronchoscopic Fogarty balloon placement sounds good but is difficult unless expertise and equipment are immediately available ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 12:00
clinical For reasonably stable but worsening distention, would take child urgently to OR for right thoracotomy and fistula ligation ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 12:00
clinical G-tube decompression may paradoxically worsen ventilation by making stomach lower resistance, allowing more air to go there instead of lungs ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 12:00
quote Decompressing the stomach may just allow that to become, in effect, the even lower resistance and allow more air to go there, making it even more difficult to ventilate. You relieve the abdominal distention, but you don't fix the flow of gas from the Trachea to the GI tract as opposed to from the trachea to the lungs. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 12:50
clinical Laparotomy with vessel loop around esophagogastric junction at hiatus with gentle traction (Rommel tourniquet technique) can temporize severe cases, leaving in place for several days before definitive repair ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 13:36
clinical For associated duodenal atresia in stable child, would potentially fix duodenal atresia first to avoid fixing esophagus upstream from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 14:05
clinical Both duodenal and esophageal atresia could potentially be fixed at same time if child is old enough and stable enough ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 14:35
clinical Many referred patients with multiple thoracotomies never had bronchoscopy and actually have laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 14:35
clinical Von Allmen changed practice to always perform intraoperative bronchoscopy after exposure to Cincinnati's complex patient population ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 14:35
clinical Bronchoscopy documents fistula location, assesses for proximal fistula, and most importantly rules out laryngeal cleft which is easily missed ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 14:35
quote That is one of the things that I have changed in my management after coming here and having exposure to the patient population that we see, the complex patients that we see with the esophageal center and the neurodigestive center, and The airway surgeons here have convinced me that it is really important to do a bronchoscopy ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 14:35
quote We have seen that many times in patients who are referred who've had multiple thoracotomies. Nobody ever did a bronchoscopy and the child actually has a laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 15:35
epidemiological Second fistula occurs in approximately 1% of cases and can be very difficult to diagnose ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 15:52
clinical High fistulas can range from trifurcation of carina (suggesting difficulty getting ends together) to very high fistulas potentially approachable through neck ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 16:35
clinical For fistula at carina (trifurcation), ET tube should be placed higher as it cannot pass the fistula; for high fistula, tube should be placed distal to fistula but not into the fistula itself ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 16:35
clinical Bronchoscopy allows guidance of ET tube placement by anesthesiologist based on fistula location ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 17:19
clinical Extrapleural approach offers advantage of potentially limiting soilage of pleural space if there is postoperative leak ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 17:19
quote I do an extra plural approach and that's the way I was trained. I think it offers the advantage of potentially limiting any soilage of the plural space if there is a leak postoperatively. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 17:41
quote I think there's no morbidity associated with that, so dividing the azygus gives you better access. In fact, frequently will guide you to the fistula. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 17:41
clinical Dividing azygos has no morbidity, gives better access, and frequently guides to the fistula ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 17:59
clinical Open azygos division is done by ligation and division; thoracoscopically can use energy devices or clips ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 18:51
quote It is amazing what you can divide with the electric cautery, with the hook electric cautery if you just get used to it, and I learned that doing actually robotic Nissans that you can divide the short gastrics in a teenager with the with the hook electric cautery. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 18:51
clinical Hook cautery can safely divide vessels if done slowly going up and down to ensure coagulation, learned from robotic Nissen experience dividing short gastrics ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 18:51
opinion 3mm surgical sealer is ideal device for this size patient and vessel ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 19:35
clinical After azygos division, identify distal esophagus and control with vessel loop, then dissect proximally to identify fistula site ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 19:35
clinical Important to mobilize pleura up around apex of lung to have access for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 19:35
clinical Spreading heel of right angle on ribs nicely shows extrapleural plane when going through intercostal muscles ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 20:28
opinion Muscle-sparing thoracotomy can make exposure more difficult; has not seen significant morbidity from standard posterolateral thoracotomy ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 21:10
clinical Must be careful with medial mobilization of distal esophagus due to blood supply concerns ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 21:10
clinical Extensive proximal pouch mobilization gives the most length to get ends together ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 21:10
opinion Thoracoscopic approach advantage is clearer visualization for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 21:10
clinical Standard teaching has been not to mobilize distal esophagus, but can actually mobilize it significantly especially laterally all the way to diaphragm ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 21:10
quote I think we have learned that, you know, the standard teaching has been that you shouldn't mobilize the distal esophagus at all, and I think we've learned that in fact you can mobilize that segment a fair amount, especially laterally. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 22:20
quote I completely agree, and I think that you have to be very careful. I personally like to just use a blade, electric cautery and with a little buzz and then mostly blunt dissection with the flat end of the blade, and I think that. That can help you and staying right on the esophagus, which is usually very thickened because it's an obstructed piece of bowel. I would rather be in the esophagus than be in the trachea up high in the chest. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 22:20
clinical Better to be in esophagus than trachea during high chest dissection; esophagus is thickened from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 22:20
clinical Risk of entering trachea during proximal dissection; must be very careful using blade cautery with light buzz and mostly blunt dissection with flat end of blade ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 23:01
clinical For significant tracheal defect, could perform sleeve resection as trachea is incredibly mobile, then place pericardium or autologous tissue between trachea and esophageal repair ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 23:59
opinion Personal preference is 5-0 PDS - absorbable monofilament suture; not a fan of silk ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 24:42
quote I personally am not a big fan of myotomy. I think it. Potentially creates an even more dysfunctional segment of the esophagus than already exists. The motility is clearly abnormal in patients with oesophageal atresia, and doing a myotomy just makes that problem worse. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 24:42
opinion Not a fan of myotomies as they potentially create even more dysfunctional esophageal segment; motility is already clearly abnormal in esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 24:42
clinical For cases too tight for primary repair, would ligate ends, tack both on tension to prevertebral fascia, close, let patient grow for couple weeks, then return to put together ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 25:38
clinical Traction or pressure is very strong stimulus to growth throughout cardiovascular system and lungs ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 25:38
quote I believe very firmly in the physiology of traction or pressure. Actually it's sort of the reverse, is a very strong stimulus to growth all over the place in the cardiovascular system in the lungs ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 26:10
clinical For thoracoscopic approach, can place traction sutures in proximal and distal ends brought out through crossed trocar sites with tension, allowing return within a week for anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 26:10
opinion Would not do classic Foker technique with prolonged paralysis and sequential suture tensioning ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 27:38
clinical Foker technique requires patients intubated and paralyzed spending weeks in ICU, which is probably worth it if you get good result ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 27:38
epidemiological Rusty Jennings and Foker published series in JPS showing 98% success getting ends together in primary atresia versus only 67% in secondary approaches after previous surgeries ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 27:38
quote They published a series a year ago or so in JPS looking at their results, and, and it was a very carefully well documented report of their results, and the data are striking if you Have a patient who has a primary atresia that you address, then in 98% of patients they're able to get the two ends of the esophagus together. In contrast, if it's a patient who's had previous surgeries and it's a secondary approach, then only 2/3 of those patients ever get the esophagus together. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 29:18
clinical For thoracoscopic procedure, rotate patient past 90 degrees to allow gravity to move lungs out of way ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 29:18
clinical Standard port placement: camera in center, posterior port inferiorly, anterior port superiorly ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 29:52
clinical Uses 3mm instruments for thoracoscopic TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 30:10
opinion Simulation courses for TEF repair will be great advantage for trainees as these cases are not done often enough to get practice ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 30:10
opinion Important to do same quality operation thoracoscopically as would do open ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 30:10
opinion Thoracoscopic visualization is very helpful for mobilizing proximal pouch ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 30:10
opinion Would use clips for dividing fistula thoracoscopically, less worried about them falling off esophagus than blood vessel ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 30:10
clinical Sewing the anastomosis is one of the challenges with thoracoscopic TEF repair and requires most experience with minimally invasive techniques ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 30:10
quote I think as with most minimally invasive operations, I think it's important to do the same operation or at least the same quality operation that you would do open and Frankly, I think that's one of the challenges with the thoracoscopic repair of a TEF is to actually sew the anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 30:10
quote I'm less worried about them falling off the esophagus than I am having them fall off a blood vessel. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 34:30
clinical Thoracoscopic ventilation management depends more on anesthesiologist than ventilator type; need anesthesiologist comfortable with procedure who pays attention during operation ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 34:30
quote I think it's more dependent on the anesthesiologist than it is on the type of ventilator, and you have to have an anesthesiologist who's comfortable with doing this and understands what you're trying to accomplish and is paying attention while you're actually doing the operation because they can either help you a lot or hurt you a lot with how they ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 35:20
clinical Anesthesiologists can get scared seeing initial shunting but things settle down if they wait ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 35:20
clinical Little CO2 insufflation with some time will collapse lung as long as anesthesiologist isn't fighting with positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 36:05
quote I agree it is a concern that the patient may require reintubation. However, I'm equally concerned that positive pressure is putting pressure on my tracheal repair, and I would much rather have the patient be breathing spontaneously to have, in fact, the opposite effect of a negative pressure in the trachea. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 36:05
clinical Concern about reintubation exists, but equally concerned that positive pressure puts pressure on tracheal repair ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 36:05
opinion Prefer spontaneous breathing with negative pressure in trachea rather than positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 36:05
clinical If patient had good lung function preoperatively and operation went smoothly, advocate extubating as soon as possible, even conceivably in operating room ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 36:35
clinical Gets contrast study at 5-7 days before pulling chest drain, timing depends on avoiding weekends ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 36:35
clinical Uses small TLS drain rather than formal chest tube, especially for open extrapleural approach ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 36:35
quote I do honestly, I'm a little bit old school in that. I still get an esophagram. I usually wait for about 5 days. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 37:20
clinical Does not use transanastomotic tube based on Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study showing much higher stricture and leak rate with transanastomotic tubes ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 37:20
quote I do not actually. I again, a practice of mine that has changed based on our results from the Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study in which the patients who Had a trans anastomotic tube had a much higher stricture and leak rate than patients that did not have that. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 37:37
clinical Midwest consortium study was presented at APSA and should be published in JPS soon ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 37:55
clinical Always appears to be narrowing at anastomosis because proximal pouch is dilated; as long as patent with free contrast flow distally, would hold off on dilation ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 37:55
clinical Unless incredibly tight stricture risking complete obstruction, would wait several weeks before first dilation ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 37:55
quote Unless it's an incredibly tight stricture, I would wait several weeks before doing a dilation unless I was worried there was going to be a complete obstruction. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 37:55
quote There's always reported a narrowing because the proximal pouch is always dilated, so it always looks like there's a narrowing at the anastomosis. As long as it's patent and contrast flows freely down the distal esophagus, I would hold off on. Uh, dialing it, dilating it probably several weeks if possible. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 38:23
clinical Fairly aggressive with dilations: dilate, wait 1-2 weeks, restudy, potentially dilate again ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 38:23
clinical Huge spectrum from very tight strictures requiring many dilations to kids fine after one dilation ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 38:23
clinical If case goes well and post-op study looks great, does not get routine follow-up esophagrams; studies based on clinical symptoms suggesting stricture ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 39:19
clinical Balloon or radial dilation is less traumatic for tissue than bougie dilators ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 39:19
clinical Dilations done with GI colleagues in aerodigestive center for bigger kids or with interventional radiologists ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 39:19
quote I think that again, having trained using bougie dilators, a balloon or radial dilation is, is less traumatic for the tissue ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 39:51
clinical For small leak with child not sick, would absolutely wait and do nothing, leaving drain in; vast majority close ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 39:51
quote I would absolutely wait and do nothing. I would leave the drain in and usually that presents with some saliva in the drain, and I would just wait, and the vast majority of those close. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 40:09
clinical Would only go to OR for leak if child getting sicker, wide open leak, or large uncontrollable pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 40:09
clinical Even reasonably significant leaks will heal, then can deal with stricture postoperatively ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 40:34
clinical Usually waits one week between esophagrams for leak; if child continues to do well, restudies ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 40:34
clinical Sometimes little outpouching where leak happened makes it unclear if still leaking; if nothing from tube and nothing goes further, leak probably healed and would remove tube ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 41:19
quote I think that first of all I would make the comment that that's a great point and it's interesting to participate in the International oesophageal atresia. A meeting that occurs every 2 years and to go and see the patients because that meeting is multidisciplinary, including even patients, and you see these patients who come back who are in their 20s or 30s or 40s and they talk about the long term issues that they have and we tend to follow patients until they're, you know, until they're eating well and then they're gone ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 41:19
clinical International esophageal atresia meeting occurs every 2 years and is multidisciplinary including patients ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 41:19
clinical Patients in their 20s-40s at international meeting discuss long-term issues; surgeons tend to follow until eating well or age 18 then never see them again ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 41:19
opinion Have a lot to learn about long-term complications; personally follows patients for at least couple years which is probably not long enough ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:15
clinical Biggest challenges in long-term follow-up are reflux and recurrent strictures ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:15
clinical More concerning are patients with ongoing reflux due to unknown long-term impact on Barrett's esophagus and potential malignant change ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:15
quote The patients that worry me more honestly are the patients who have ongoing reflux, and we don't know the long term impact of that on things like Barrett's esophagus and Potential long term risk for malignant change and those sorts of things. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:45
quote If I have a patient who has a stricture that's been dilated 2 or 3 times, my next move would be to address reflux. Most of the patients we leave on anti-reflux medications when they are discharged from the hospital. I would argue that virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux. If they have a stricture that is not responsive to dilations, it dilates easily and then restrictures. I personally am very aggressive about doing a fundoplication on those patients ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:45
clinical Very aggressive about fundoplication for strictures not responsive to dilations (dilates easily then restrictures) ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:45
clinical Virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:45
clinical Most patients left on anti-reflux medications when discharged from hospital ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 42:45
clinical If patient has stricture dilated 2-3 times, next move would be to address reflux ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 43:26
quote I do, but as with most Nissans, I make them loose and I make them short, so I usually use two or at most 3 stitches for the wrap and make sure that it is loose around the distal esophagus. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 43:26
clinical Would wait 4-6 weeks to see how close ends come together, then attempt primary repair once within 2 vertebral bodies ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 43:26
clinical Does Nissen fundoplication in patients with poor esophageal motility but makes them loose and short, using 2 or at most 3 stitches ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 43:26
clinical For pure esophageal atresia, approach is G-tube placement with calibration of gap length using distal catheter pushed up and NG tube in proximal pouch ↗

Esophageal Atresia in Brief: Presentation, Workup, Diagnosis, and Treatment

▶ Ep 29 · 0:00
quote Esophageal Atresia affects one in 2,500 live births. So it's a really important condition for pediatric surgeons to know about. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 0:00
epidemiological Esophageal atresia affects 1 in 2,500 live births. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 0:51
quote People frequently use the term Tracheoesophageal Fistula when they really mean Esophageal Atresia. So it's important to be careful about the terminology that you use when you discuss this anomaly. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 1:37
clinical Patients with tracheoesophageal fistula usually don't present until after birth when they have problems feeding, and a Repogle tube meets resistance at typically 10 to 12 centimeters. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 1:58
clinical Injecting air into the NG tube prior to X-ray will distend the proximal pouch; if it doesn't distend, either the diagnosis is wrong or there could be a proximal fistula. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 1:58
quote It's often very helpful to prior to taking the X-ray of during the diagnostic process to inject air into the NG tube, because that will distend the proximal pouch. And if it doesn't distend, then either you have the wrong diagnosis, or it could be a clue that there's a proximal fistula. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 3:10
clinical VACTERL workup includes renal ultrasound and spine ultrasound, which doesn't need to be done immediately after birth. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 3:10
clinical The most pressing study needed is an echocardiogram to look at cardiac function and ensure there are no other congenital heart anomalies, and to identify which side the aortic arch is on. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 4:02
clinical To be considered truly VACTERL, you need at least three of the associations. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 4:48
clinical H-type (more accurately N-type) esophageal atresia has an intact esophagus but a fistula between the trachea and esophagus, typically high, and is uncommon. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 4:48
clinical Other very uncommon types include proximal fistula or proximal and distal fistula to the trachea. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 5:36
clinical For the most common type of esophageal atresia, management is to stabilize the patient and get them to the OR, with almost all babies needing surgery within the first day or two depending on stability and medical comorbidities. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 5:57
quote So we feel that it's really important that every child with Esophageal Atresia undergo bronchoscopy at their initial trip to the operating room to evaluate for multiple things. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 5:57
clinical Bronchoscopy is performed to evaluate for the location of a proximal fistula, evaluate the degree of tracheomalacia, and help position the endotracheal tube to minimize the risk of insufflating the GI tract. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 6:46
clinical Extubation is attempted in one to two days, minimizing the risk of using high flow or CPAP following extubation, so the child should be in good respiratory shape when the tube is pulled. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 7:43
clinical Recurrent fistula is a less common early complication. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 7:43
clinical One of the most common short-term complications is a leak following repair, usually diagnosed with spit coming out of the chest tube, and managed with observation. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 7:43
clinical The second most common complication is stricture. ↗
▶ Ep 29 · 7:43
clinical Reflux is a longer-term complication. ↗

Update Course 2021: MAGNET THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA

▶ Ep 30 · 0:50
quote we're going to finish up once again with a completely non controversial topic for which the therapy is very straightforward and that is long gap esophagial atresia. ↗
▶ Ep 30 · 21:07
clinical Dr. Von Allmen's single magnet case worked but resulted in dense stricture requiring lots of dilation and G-tube feeds for long time, though avoided reoperation. ↗

Esophageal Replacement with Dr. Dan von Allmen

▶ Ep 39 · 0:51
quote We have a tendency to say TEF when we mean esophageal atresia, so just be very careful when you're talking about these things that you're clear about what you're talking about, because when you say, oh, the patient had a TEF when really. They had is a pure esophageal atresia. That's just not correct. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 1:12
epidemiological Chromosomal anomalies are fairly common in esophageal atresia, with recurrence risk of 0.5 to 2% among parents who have one affected child ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 1:12
epidemiological Esophageal atresia occurs in 1 in 4500 births in the United States with a slight male predominance ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 1:36
clinical Prenatal ultrasound detects only about half of esophageal atresia cases, primarily detecting pure atresia cases due to significant proximal pouch dilation ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 1:55
clinical The most common type of esophageal atresia is proximal atresia with a distal fistula (type C) ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 2:42
epidemiological Esophageal atresia associated with significant cardiac anomalies and low birth weight has only 27 to 30% survival rate ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 2:42
quote It is an association. It is not a syndrome. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 2:42
clinical VACTERL is an association, not a syndrome, requiring 3 of the defects (vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, tracheoesophageal, renal, limb) for diagnosis ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 3:14
quote Basically, the problem with this is that the low resistance pathway is into the intestine, and that's why the air is going into the intestine instead of into the lungs. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 3:14
clinical In type C fistula with respiratory distress, the low resistance pathway is into the intestine rather than the lungs, causing air to continuously enter the intestine and increase stomach size ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 3:14
clinical Gastric decompression with G-tube or needle helps temporarily but air still preferentially exits through the G-tube rather than entering the lungs; placing G-tube end underwater provides some resistance but doesn't completely fix the problem ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 4:19
clinical Placing a vessel loop around the distal esophagus is easier than dividing the fistula when in trouble during the procedure ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 4:30
clinical Every child with tracheoesophageal fistula or esophageal atresia needs a bronchoscopy due to 10-15% association of airway issues ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 4:30
quote We believe quite strongly that every child with a tracheoesophageal fistula or esophageal atresia needs a bronchoscopy. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 4:57
clinical Virtually all children with esophageal atresia have some element of tracheomalacia, though bronchoscopy can show anatomic tracheomalacia but cannot determine if it is clinically significant ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 4:57
quote Virtually all kids with esophageal atresia have some element of tracheomalacia. The question is whether it's significant or not. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 5:25
quote I personally believe that there is some Growth in the esophagus and typically our approach is to wait several weeks. I think once you get past probably 4 to 6 weeks, there's not going to be any more growth. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 5:25
clinical For long-gap cases, the approach at Cincinnati Children's is to support the child with enteral bolus feedings to stretch the distal esophagus, obtain sequential gap studies, and take the child to OR at 6 weeks ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 5:25
opinion There is some growth in the esophagus over time in long-gap cases, with maximal growth occurring by 4-6 weeks ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 6:01
opinion Thoracoscopic visualization of the esophagus is better than open surgery when the camera port is placed looking straight down at the esophagus ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 6:33
clinical The azygos vein guides to the level of the fistula because the fistula typically occurs right about the level of the azygos vein ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 6:55
clinical When clipping the fistula, the clip must be flush with the trachea to avoid leaving a long pouch that can pool secretions and cause problems ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 6:55
quote It's really important to make sure that it is flushed with the trachea. You don't want to leave a long. A pouch because that pouch can pool secretions and would potentially cause problems. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 7:15
clinical Anesthesiologist must push down repeatedly to help locate the proximal esophageal pouch during surgery ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 7:30
clinical It is safer to put a hole in the esophageal pouch than in the trachea during dissection ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 7:30
quote You would much rather put a hole in the esophageal pouch than in the trachea. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 7:30
clinical Iatrogenic tracheal injury during thoracoscopy can be detected by sudden elevation of end-tidal CO2 as CO2 from the thoracoscopy enters the trachea ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 8:14
clinical The Foker procedure uses traction sutures brought through the chest wall with sequential tightening to stimulate esophageal growth ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 8:46
opinion No esophageal replacement technique is superior to others; the most common is gastric pull-up, but reverse gastric tube, colon interposition, and duodenal interposition are also used ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 8:46
epidemiological Primary Foker procedure cases spent more than 1 month in ICU on average and were paralyzed for more than 2 weeks ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 8:46
epidemiological Secondary Foker cases spent a mean of 110 days in ICU and were paralyzed for more than 1 month ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 8:46
quote I would say that none is any better than the other. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 8:46
epidemiological In primary Foker cases, esophageal connection was achieved 96% of the time, compared to only 67% in secondary cases with previous operations ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 9:43
clinical Reverse gastric tube is created from the greater curve of the stomach and requires preservation of the gastroepiploic artery when placing initial G-tube ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 9:43
opinion Reverse gastric tube has many problems and is not used at Cincinnati Children's ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 10:06
clinical Colon interposition provides tremendous length, allowing anastomosis to the pharynx in caustic ingestion patients with no remaining esophagus ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 10:06
quote The advantages of the colon are that you can get tremendous length. We've had caustic congestion patients where we literally pushed down on the pharynx and we anastoize the colon to the pharynx because there was no esophagus left. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 10:32
clinical The biggest challenge with colon interposition is that the colon dilates and elongates over time, causing food to collect and not empty properly ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 10:32
clinical Contrary to initial teaching, colon interposition grafts are not hard to revise and do not necessarily damage blood supply during revision ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 10:32
quote We were taught initially that these are hard to revise because you damage the blood supply to the colon, but that's actually not true. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 10:55
epidemiological In Cincinnati Children's first 13 colon interpositions, 12 of 13 patients were NPO at presentation, and there has been no graft loss since the initial case ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 10:55
quote One of my patients coined the term the callophagus. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 12:00
clinical Posterior tracheopexy involves placing sutures into the membranous trachea to hold it back and manage tracheomalacia ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 12:00
quote I am a believer in the posterior tracheopexy, which is putting some sutures into that membranous trachea to hold it, uh, back. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 12:00
opinion It is unknown which patients need posterior tracheopexy, but performing it prophylactically during initial repair takes only 15 minutes and avoids reoperation through previously operated field ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 12:35
quote As surgeons, we're frequently trained that we need to be the captain of the ship, and it's all about us, and we need to do everything. And one of the best things that happened to me when I came here and started doing these esophageal cases was partnering with our ENT group. ↗
▶ Ep 39 · 12:35
opinion At Cincinnati Children's, complex esophageal cases including colon interpositions are performed jointly with ENT surgeons, prioritizing patient outcomes over individual surgeon ego ↗
Daniel's statements about Esophageal Atresia 261 statements

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Aerodigestive & Esophageal Surgery - Difficult Tracheal Esophageal Fistula

▶ Ep 6 · 9:58
clinical If a patient is aspirating from above (oropharyngeal or esophageal source), an anti-reflux procedure does not help and may make them worse. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 14:02
clinical Routine bronchoscopy is now standard practice for all type C TEF repairs at Cincinnati Children's, often done in collaboration with ENT colleagues. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 19:37
clinical Dual scoping (simultaneous bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy) allows scopes to 'shake hands' across a fistula, light transillumination through tissue, and injection of saline or air to reveal subtle openings. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 55:54
quote Button batteries are bad. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 56:27
quote The tissue damage extends beyond what you can appreciate with the naked eye, and the progression of it probably extends beyond what you would think is the normal time frame. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 1:52:36
clinical In a patient with multiple bronchoesophageal fistulas and chronic bronchiectasis, lobectomy with resection of the esophageal pseudo-diverticulum can be performed safely; the esophagus can be primarily closed if not strictured. ↗

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 8 · 1:36
quote It certainly is an interest that we have here with a whole group here in Cincinnati, but it can be an incredibly difficult, challenging problem. It's one of the great cases in pediatric surgery and one of the most difficult cases, so it really runs the whole spectrum for sure. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 2:01
clinical Cincinnati Children's has a multidisciplinary aerodigestive center that includes ENT airway surgeons, GI, pulmonary, general surgeons, nurse practitioners, geneticists, and dietitians ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 2:46
clinical The aerodigestive center typically receives more complicated patients referred from outside through either esophageal or airway pathways ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 3:55
clinical Physical examination findings in suspected esophageal atresia include assessment for scaphoid versus distended abdomen and respiratory distress ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 4:20
clinical Personal confirmation of NG tube passage is important as some patients started on treatment for esophageal atresia are later found to have tubes that pass normally ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 4:20
quote I personally like to try to pass the NG tube myself, having been burned with NG tubes that wouldn't go down, and the patient was started on treatment as an oesophageal atresia and subsequently found that the NG tube passes just fine. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 4:55
clinical Injecting air into the NG tube and obtaining a plain film helps visualize the proximal pouch and assess GI tract gas pattern ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 5:10
clinical Lack of visible distended proximal pouch on plain film raises concern for either incorrect diagnosis or presence of proximal fistula allowing pouch decompression ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 5:10
quote If I can't see a distended proximal pouch, then I worry. I worry that either one of two things either that the diagnosis is incorrect and in fact it is not an esophageal atresia, or that there could be a proximal fistula which is allowing that proximal pouch to decompress. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 5:42
clinical Contrast studies can be performed when there is high suspicion of anatomic variants, with no contraindication as long as radiologist is aware of potential obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 6:25
clinical Preoperative echocardiogram is essential to assess cardiac anatomy and rule out right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 6:54
clinical Renal ultrasound and spine evaluation for tethered cord are needed but are elective and not necessary before addressing esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 7:27
guideline Conventional wisdom for right-sided aortic arch is to perform left thoracotomy rather than right thoracotomy ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 7:27
quote I think that faced with that, that's what I would do if, if the echo was pretty clear and suggest that there's a right sided aortic arch, I would probably approach it through a left thoracotomy. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 7:51
clinical Left thoracotomy for right-sided arch is somewhat more difficult with heart more in the way and harder proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 8:20
clinical It is possible to complete the repair from right thoracotomy even with right-sided arch, though some reports suggest higher incidence of swallowing problems ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 8:20
quote I think that in most cases it is possible to get the esophagus together and to have a good result. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 9:31
quote I think that in a larger baby who's stable from a respiratory standpoint, not intubated in particular, I think it's perfectly legitimate to wait until you have all the resources that you would have in the middle of the day ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 9:31
clinical In stable larger babies not intubated, it is reasonable to wait until all resources are available in the middle of the day, even waiting until the next day ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 9:56
clinical Prolonged delay should be avoided due to concern for colonizing GI tract and soiling lungs ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 10:15
quote I've not found personally that an oscillator makes a whole lot of difference. I think if the child has a, has a large fistula, and typically it's actually, I believe this tends to be a bigger problem in younger, that is more premature infants who have more significant lung disease ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 10:15
clinical Oscillator ventilation has not been found to make significant difference in managing unstable TEF patients ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 10:35
clinical Air preferentially entering GI tract versus lungs tends to be a bigger problem in more premature infants with significant lung disease and poor lung compliance ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 10:56
clinical Treating with surfactant and improving lung compliance helps as much as changing ventilator type in managing air leak through fistula ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 11:21
clinical Risk of waiting too long to make a decision in deteriorating patient can lead to emergency situation where ventilation becomes impossible ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 11:21
quote I think one of the risks is to wait too long to make a decision, and I've made that mistake myself, and then it becomes an emergency if you can't ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 11:40
clinical For reasonably stable but worsening patient, approach is urgent right thoracotomy with fistula ligation ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 12:00
clinical Bronchoscopic placement of Fogarty balloon in fistula is difficult unless expertise and equipment are immediately available ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 12:25
quote Decompressing the stomach may just allow that to become, in effect, the even lower resistance and allow more air to go there, making it even more difficult to ventilate. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 12:25
clinical G-tube decompression may paradoxically worsen ventilation by making stomach lower resistance path, allowing more air to go there rather than to lungs ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 12:50
clinical Laparotomy with vessel loop around esophagogastric junction at hiatus with gentle traction (Rommel tourniquet technique) can temporize unstable patient for several days ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 13:51
clinical In stable child with associated duodenal atresia, consider fixing duodenal atresia first to avoid repairing esophagus upstream from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 14:13
quote I think that our pediatric anesthesia has gotten good enough and if the child is old enough and stable enough you could potentially do both procedures at the same time. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 14:13
clinical Both esophageal and duodenal atresia can potentially be repaired in same operative setting if child is stable enough ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 14:35
clinical Routine intraoperative bronchoscopy is important to document fistula location, assess for proximal fistula, and rule out laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 14:55
quote The airway surgeons here have convinced me that it is really important to do a bronchoscopy ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 15:10
quote we have seen that many times in patients who are referred who've had multiple thoracotomies. Nobody ever did a bronchoscopy and the child actually has a laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 15:10
clinical Laryngeal clefts are easily missed and have been seen many times in referred patients who had multiple thoracotomies without anyone doing bronchoscopy ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 15:30
epidemiological Second fistulas are very uncommon, occurring in perhaps 1% of cases, and can be difficult to diagnose ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 15:52
clinical High fistulas can be seen bronchoscopically ahead of time and range from trifurcation of carina to fistulas potentially approachable through the neck ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 16:35
clinical Bronchoscopy allows guidance of anesthesiologist for ET tube placement relative to fistula location ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 17:00
clinical For fistula at carina (trifurcation), ET tube should be placed higher as it cannot pass the fistula; for high fistula, tube should be placed distal to fistula ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 17:16
clinical Extrapleural approach offers advantage of potentially limiting soilage of pleural space if there is postoperative leak ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 17:16
quote I do an extra plural approach and that's the way I was trained. I think it offers the advantage of potentially limiting any soilage of the plural space if there is a leak postoperatively. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 17:41
clinical Dividing azygos vein has no morbidity and gives better access, frequently guiding to the fistula ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 17:41
quote I think there's no morbidity associated with that, so dividing the azygus gives you better access. In fact, frequently will guide you to the fistula. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 17:59
clinical For open repair, azygos is typically ligated and divided with suture ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 19:35
clinical Spreading intercostal muscles with heel of right angle on ribs nicely shows extrapleural plane ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 20:00
clinical Mobilizing pleura up around apex of lung is important to have access for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 20:24
clinical Distal esophageal segment is controlled with vessel loop to allow proximal dissection to identify fistula ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 21:10
quote I think we have learned that, you know, the standard teaching has been that you shouldn't mobilize the distal esophagus at all, and I think we've learned that in fact you can mobilize that segment a fair amount, especially laterally. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 21:10
clinical Standard teaching has been not to mobilize distal esophagus, but it can be mobilized extensively laterally and to some degree medially with care for blood supply ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 21:40
clinical Extensive proximal pouch mobilization is most important for gaining length to approximate the ends ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 22:20
quote I completely agree, and I think that you have to be very careful. I personally like to just use a blade, electric cautery and with a little buzz and then mostly blunt dissection with the flat end of the blade ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 22:20
clinical Blade electrocautery with light buzz and mostly blunt dissection with flat end of blade, staying right on thickened obstructed esophagus, is preferred technique for proximal dissection ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 22:40
quote I would rather be in the esophagus than be in the trachea up high in the chest. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 22:44
clinical Better to be in esophagus than in trachea high in chest during proximal dissection ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 22:51
clinical Large tracheal defect would require sleeve resection, with trachea being incredibly mobile, and placement of pericardium or autologous tissue between trachea and esophageal repair ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 23:15
quote The trachea is incredibly mobile. Another thing that I have learned from my ENT colleagues so that you could effectively do a slide to pull the distal trachea up to the proximal portion to cover that defect. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 23:59
quote I personally use PDS. I probably use 50 PDS. I like absorbable suture. I like monofilament suture. I'm not a big fan of silk ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 23:59
opinion Personal preference is 5-0 PDS for anastomosis, favoring absorbable monofilament over silk or other sutures ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 24:42
opinion Circular myotomies are not favored as they potentially create even more dysfunctional esophageal segment in patients who already have abnormal motility ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 24:50
quote I personally am not a big fan of myotomy. I think it. Potentially creates an even more dysfunctional segment of the esophagus than already exists. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 25:10
quote my approach to this is usually if I really try and I think it's going to be way too tight. Then I would ligate the ends, ligate the distal end after dividing the fistula, and then tack both ends on some tension to the prevertebral fascia, close and let the patient grow for a couple of weeks ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 25:10
clinical For long-gap cases, approach is to ligate ends, tack both on tension to prevertebral fascia, close, let patient grow for several weeks, then return for anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 25:38
clinical Traction or pressure is a strong stimulus to growth throughout the body including cardiovascular system and lungs ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 25:38
quote I believe very firmly in the physiology of traction or pressure. Actually it's sort of the reverse, is a very strong stimulus to growth all over the place in the cardiovascular system in the lungs ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 26:00
clinical Internal Foker technique uses traction sutures in proximal and distal ends brought out through crossed trocar sites with tension, allowing rapid lengthening within about a week ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 27:38
epidemiological Boston series by Jennings and Foker showed 98% success getting ends together in primary atresia versus only 67% in secondary cases after previous surgeries ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 27:38
quote the data are striking if you Have a patient who has a primary atresia that you address, then in 98% of patients they're able to get the two ends of the esophagus together. In contrast, if it's a patient who's had previous surgeries and it's a secondary approach, then only 2/3 of those patients ever get the esophagus together. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 28:10
clinical Foker technique requires patients to be intubated and paralyzed, spending weeks in ICU, which is significant cost but may be worth it for good result ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 29:18
clinical For thoracoscopic approach, patient is rotated past 90 degrees to allow gravity to move lungs out of the way ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 29:40
clinical Standard thoracoscopic port placement uses camera in center with posterior port inferiorly and anterior port superiorly ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 29:52
clinical 3mm instruments are used for thoracoscopic TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 30:10
quote I think it's important to do the same operation or at least the same quality operation that you would do open and Frankly, I think that's one of the challenges with the thoracoscopic repair of a TEF is to actually sew the anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 30:10
clinical Thoracoscopic visualization is very helpful for mobilizing proximal pouch ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 30:30
clinical Anastomosis is the most difficult part of thoracoscopic repair, requiring significant experience with minimally invasive suturing techniques ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 31:00
opinion Clips are preferred for dividing fistula thoracoscopically, with less concern about them falling off esophagus than blood vessels ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 31:00
quote I'm less worried about them falling off the esophagus than I am having them fall off a blood vessel. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 31:21
quote It is amazing what you can divide with the electric cautery, with the hook electric cautery if you just get used to it ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 31:21
clinical Hook electrocautery can safely divide vessels if used carefully with up-and-down motion ensuring coagulation ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 31:50
opinion 3mm surgical sealer is ideal device for this size patient and vessel size ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 31:50
quote I think the 3 millimeter sealer is a, is a great device for this size patient and that size vessel. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 32:00
clinical Hanging stitch technique (first stitch brought out of chest) helps line up anastomosis similar to duodenal atresia repair ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 33:54
clinical Hanging stitch helps release tension as first stitches are placed and allows visualization of mucosa in both proximal and distal lumens ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 33:54
quote To me, the important part, and I beat on our residents about this when they're doing this anastomosis, is you have to be able to see. You want to make sure that you incorporate mucosa on every stitch ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 34:15
clinical Incorporating mucosa on every stitch is critical and easier to verify with thoracoscopic visualization ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 34:23
clinical Ventilator management is more dependent on anesthesiologist comfort and attention than ventilator type ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 34:23
quote I think it's more dependent on the anesthesiologist than it is on the type of ventilator, and you have to have an anesthesiologist who's comfortable with doing this and understands what you're trying to accomplish ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 34:45
clinical Anesthesiologist must understand goals and pay attention during operation, as they can significantly help or hurt with ventilation approach ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 35:20
clinical Little CO2 insufflation with time will collapse lung as long as anesthesiologist is not fighting with positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 35:58
clinical Concern about reintubation is balanced by greater concern that positive pressure puts pressure on tracheal repair ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 35:58
quote I agree it is a concern that the patient may require reintubation. However, I'm equally concerned that positive pressure is putting pressure on my tracheal repair ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 36:15
clinical Spontaneous breathing creates negative pressure in trachea, which is preferable to positive pressure on repair ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 36:15
quote I would much rather have the patient be breathing spontaneously to have, in fact, the opposite effect of a negative pressure in the trachea. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 36:34
clinical For patients with good preoperative lung function and smooth operation, advocate extubating as soon as possible, even in operating room ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 36:43
clinical Contrast esophagram is obtained at 5-7 days postoperatively before pulling chest drain ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 36:43
quote I do honestly, I'm a little bit old school in that. I still get an esophagram. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 37:15
clinical Small TLS drains are used rather than formal chest tube, especially for open extrapleural approach ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 37:20
clinical Trans-anastomotic tubes are not used based on Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study showing much higher stricture and leak rates with their use ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 37:20
quote I do not actually. I again, a practice of mine that has changed based on our results from the Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study in which the patients who Had a trans anastomotic tube had a much higher stricture and leak rate ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 37:53
clinical Unless stricture is incredibly tight, would wait several weeks before first dilation to avoid complete obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 38:15
clinical Proximal pouch is always dilated so there is always reported narrowing at anastomosis; as long as contrast flows freely distally, can wait on dilation ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 38:15
quote there's always reported a narrowing because the proximal pouch is always dilated, so it always looks like there's a narrowing at the anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 38:40
clinical Fairly aggressive dilation approach: dilate, wait 1-2 weeks, restudy, potentially dilate again ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 39:00
clinical If case goes well and post-op study looks great, do not get routine follow-up esophagrams; study only based on clinical symptoms suggesting stricture ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 39:21
clinical Balloon or radial dilation is less traumatic to tissue than bougie dilators ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 39:21
quote I think that again, having trained using bougie dilators, a balloon or radial dilation is, is less traumatic for the tissue ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 39:44
clinical For small leak in non-sick child, absolutely wait and do nothing, leaving drain in place; vast majority close spontaneously ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 39:44
quote I would absolutely wait and do nothing. I would leave the drain in and usually that presents with some saliva in the drain, and I would just wait, and the vast majority of those close. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 40:09
clinical Indications for operative intervention for leak are child getting sicker, wide open leak, or large uncontrollable pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 40:34
clinical Even reasonably significant leaks will heal, then stricture can be dealt with postoperatively ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 40:40
clinical Typically wait one week between esophagrams for leak, though timing is somewhat arbitrary ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 41:11
opinion Pediatric surgeons do not do a fantastic job of long-term follow-up with TEF patients ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 41:11
quote I think that first of all I would make the comment that that's a great point and it's interesting to participate in the International oesophageal atresia. A meeting that occurs every 2 years and to go and see the patients because that meeting is multidisciplinary, including even patients, and you see these patients who come back who are in their 20s or 30s or 40s and they talk about the long term issues that they have and we tend to follow patients until they're, you know, until they're eating well and then they're gone ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 41:30
clinical International esophageal atresia meetings show patients in their 20s-40s with long-term issues that surgeons are unaware of because patients are lost after age 18 ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 42:15
opinion Personal practice is to follow patients for at least a couple years, which is probably not long enough ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 42:30
quote The patients that worry me more honestly are the patients who have ongoing reflux, and we don't know the long term impact of that on things like Barrett's esophagus and Potential long term risk for malignant change ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 42:30
opinion Patients with ongoing reflux are more concerning than those with recurrent strictures due to unknown long-term impact on Barrett's esophagus and malignant change risk ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 42:45
clinical Most patients are discharged on anti-reflux medications ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 42:55
clinical Virtually all TEF patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 42:55
quote I would argue that virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux. ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 43:10
quote I personally am very aggressive about doing a fundoplication on those patients ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 43:10
clinical After 2-3 dilations for recurrent stricture, next move is to address reflux with fundoplication ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 43:26
clinical For patients with poor esophageal motility, still perform Nissen but make it loose and short using 2 or at most 3 stitches ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 43:56
clinical For pure esophageal atresia, approach is G-tube placement with gap calibration using distal catheter and proximal NG tube ↗
▶ Ep 8 · 44:20
clinical Wait 4-6 weeks to see how close ends come together, then attempt primary repair once within 2 vertebral bodies ↗

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 21 · 1:36
quote It certainly is an interest that we have here with a whole group here in Cincinnati, but it can be an incredibly difficult, challenging problem. It's one of the great cases in pediatric surgery and one of the most difficult cases, so it really runs the whole spectrum for sure. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 2:01
clinical Cincinnati Children's has a multidisciplinary aerodigestive center including ENT airway surgeons, GI, pulmonary, general surgeons, nurse practitioners, geneticists, and dietitians ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 2:46
clinical The aerodigestive center typically receives more complicated patients referred from outside through either esophageal or airway arms ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 3:55
clinical Physical examination should assess for scaphoid versus full or distended abdomen and respiratory distress ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 4:20
clinical The surgeon should personally attempt to pass the NG tube rather than relying on nursing reports, as tubes reported as not passing sometimes pass easily ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 4:20
quote I personally like to try to pass the NG tube myself, having been burned with NG tubes that wouldn't go down, and the patient was started on treatment as an oesophageal atresia and subsequently found that the NG tube passes just fine. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 4:55
clinical Injecting air into the NG tube and obtaining a plain film helps visualize proximal pouch distention and assess distal GI gas pattern ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 5:01
clinical Lack of visible distended proximal pouch raises concern for either incorrect diagnosis or presence of proximal fistula allowing pouch decompression ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 5:01
quote If I can't see a distended proximal pouch, then I worry. I worry that either one of two things either that the diagnosis is incorrect and in fact it is not an esophageal atresia, or that there could be a proximal fistula which is allowing that proximal pouch to decompress. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 5:42
clinical Contrast studies can be performed if there is high suspicion of unusual anatomy, as long as the radiologist knows the esophagus may be obstructed ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 6:25
clinical Echocardiogram is the most important preoperative study to assess cardiac anatomy and rule out right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 6:25
quote The most important one prior to taking the patient to the operating room is to get an echocardiogram, and the utility of that is, is obviously to assess the cardiac anatomy, but more as importantly, I would say is to assess to be sure that the patient does not have a right-sided aortic arch. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 6:54
clinical Renal ultrasound and spine evaluation for tethered cord are needed but are elective and not necessary before addressing esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 7:27
guideline Conventional wisdom is to perform left thoracotomy for right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 7:51
clinical Left thoracotomy for right-sided arch is somewhat more difficult with the heart more in the way and harder proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 8:20
clinical It is possible to complete the repair from the right side if right-sided arch is discovered intraoperatively, though some reports suggest higher incidence of swallowing problems ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 9:31
clinical In a stable larger baby not intubated, it is reasonable to wait until all resources are available in the middle of the day, even waiting 1-2 days ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 9:56
clinical Should not wait a long time before repair due to risk of colonizing GI tract and soiling lungs ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 10:15
clinical Large fistula with distention tends to be a bigger problem in more premature infants with significant lung disease, where poor lung compliance drives air into GI tract ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 10:15
opinion Oscillator ventilation does not make a significant difference in managing large fistulas with abdominal distention ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 10:15
quote I've not found personally that an oscillator makes a whole lot of difference. I think if the child has a, has a large fistula, and typically it's actually, I believe this tends to be a bigger problem in younger, that is more premature infants who have more significant lung disease, and their compliance of their lungs is really what drives the The air into the GI tract as opposed to into the lungs. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 10:56
clinical Treating with surfactant and improving lung compliance helps as much as changing ventilator type ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 11:21
clinical Risk of waiting too long to make a decision in worsening distention can lead to emergency situation where child cannot be ventilated ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 11:21
quote I think this is a difficult clinical scenario, and, and I think one of the risks is to wait too long to make a decision, and I've made that mistake myself, and then it becomes an emergency if you can't ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 12:00
quote Decompressing the stomach may just allow that to become, in effect, the even lower resistance and allow more air to go there, making it even more difficult to ventilate. You relieve the abdominal distention, but you don't fix the flow of gas from the Trachea to the GI tract as opposed to from the trachea to the lungs. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 12:00
clinical For reasonably stable but worsening distention, would take child urgently to OR for right thoracotomy and fistula ligation ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 12:00
opinion Bronchoscopic Fogarty balloon placement sounds good but is difficult unless expertise and equipment are immediately available ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 12:00
clinical G-tube decompression may paradoxically worsen ventilation by making stomach lower resistance, allowing more air to go there instead of lungs ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 12:50
clinical Laparotomy with vessel loop around esophagogastric junction at hiatus with gentle traction (Rommel tourniquet technique) can temporize severe cases, leaving in place for several days before definitive repair ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 13:36
clinical For associated duodenal atresia in stable child, would potentially fix duodenal atresia first to avoid fixing esophagus upstream from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 14:05
clinical Both duodenal and esophageal atresia could potentially be fixed at same time if child is old enough and stable enough ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 14:35
clinical Von Allmen changed practice to always perform intraoperative bronchoscopy after exposure to Cincinnati's complex patient population ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 14:35
clinical Bronchoscopy documents fistula location, assesses for proximal fistula, and most importantly rules out laryngeal cleft which is easily missed ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 14:35
clinical Many referred patients with multiple thoracotomies never had bronchoscopy and actually have laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 14:35
quote We have seen that many times in patients who are referred who've had multiple thoracotomies. Nobody ever did a bronchoscopy and the child actually has a laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 14:35
quote That is one of the things that I have changed in my management after coming here and having exposure to the patient population that we see, the complex patients that we see with the esophageal center and the neurodigestive center, and The airway surgeons here have convinced me that it is really important to do a bronchoscopy ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 15:35
epidemiological Second fistula occurs in approximately 1% of cases and can be very difficult to diagnose ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 15:52
clinical High fistulas can range from trifurcation of carina (suggesting difficulty getting ends together) to very high fistulas potentially approachable through neck ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 16:35
clinical For fistula at carina (trifurcation), ET tube should be placed higher as it cannot pass the fistula; for high fistula, tube should be placed distal to fistula but not into the fistula itself ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 16:35
clinical Bronchoscopy allows guidance of ET tube placement by anesthesiologist based on fistula location ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 17:19
clinical Extrapleural approach offers advantage of potentially limiting soilage of pleural space if there is postoperative leak ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 17:19
quote I do an extra plural approach and that's the way I was trained. I think it offers the advantage of potentially limiting any soilage of the plural space if there is a leak postoperatively. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 17:41
quote I think there's no morbidity associated with that, so dividing the azygus gives you better access. In fact, frequently will guide you to the fistula. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 17:41
clinical Dividing azygos has no morbidity, gives better access, and frequently guides to the fistula ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 17:59
clinical Open azygos division is done by ligation and division; thoracoscopically can use energy devices or clips ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 18:51
quote It is amazing what you can divide with the electric cautery, with the hook electric cautery if you just get used to it, and I learned that doing actually robotic Nissans that you can divide the short gastrics in a teenager with the with the hook electric cautery. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 18:51
opinion 3mm surgical sealer is ideal device for this size patient and vessel ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 18:51
clinical Hook cautery can safely divide vessels if done slowly going up and down to ensure coagulation, learned from robotic Nissen experience dividing short gastrics ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 19:35
clinical Important to mobilize pleura up around apex of lung to have access for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 19:35
clinical Spreading heel of right angle on ribs nicely shows extrapleural plane when going through intercostal muscles ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 19:35
clinical After azygos division, identify distal esophagus and control with vessel loop, then dissect proximally to identify fistula site ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 20:28
opinion Muscle-sparing thoracotomy can make exposure more difficult; has not seen significant morbidity from standard posterolateral thoracotomy ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 21:10
clinical Standard teaching has been not to mobilize distal esophagus, but can actually mobilize it significantly especially laterally all the way to diaphragm ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 21:10
clinical Must be careful with medial mobilization of distal esophagus due to blood supply concerns ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 21:10
clinical Extensive proximal pouch mobilization gives the most length to get ends together ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 21:10
opinion Thoracoscopic approach advantage is clearer visualization for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 21:10
quote I think we have learned that, you know, the standard teaching has been that you shouldn't mobilize the distal esophagus at all, and I think we've learned that in fact you can mobilize that segment a fair amount, especially laterally. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 22:20
quote I completely agree, and I think that you have to be very careful. I personally like to just use a blade, electric cautery and with a little buzz and then mostly blunt dissection with the flat end of the blade, and I think that. That can help you and staying right on the esophagus, which is usually very thickened because it's an obstructed piece of bowel. I would rather be in the esophagus than be in the trachea up high in the chest. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 22:20
clinical Risk of entering trachea during proximal dissection; must be very careful using blade cautery with light buzz and mostly blunt dissection with flat end of blade ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 22:20
clinical Better to be in esophagus than trachea during high chest dissection; esophagus is thickened from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 23:01
clinical For significant tracheal defect, could perform sleeve resection as trachea is incredibly mobile, then place pericardium or autologous tissue between trachea and esophageal repair ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 23:59
opinion Personal preference is 5-0 PDS - absorbable monofilament suture; not a fan of silk ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 24:42
opinion Not a fan of myotomies as they potentially create even more dysfunctional esophageal segment; motility is already clearly abnormal in esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 24:42
quote I personally am not a big fan of myotomy. I think it. Potentially creates an even more dysfunctional segment of the esophagus than already exists. The motility is clearly abnormal in patients with oesophageal atresia, and doing a myotomy just makes that problem worse. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 24:42
clinical For cases too tight for primary repair, would ligate ends, tack both on tension to prevertebral fascia, close, let patient grow for couple weeks, then return to put together ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 25:38
quote I believe very firmly in the physiology of traction or pressure. Actually it's sort of the reverse, is a very strong stimulus to growth all over the place in the cardiovascular system in the lungs ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 25:38
clinical Traction or pressure is very strong stimulus to growth throughout cardiovascular system and lungs ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 26:10
opinion Would not do classic Foker technique with prolonged paralysis and sequential suture tensioning ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 26:10
clinical For thoracoscopic approach, can place traction sutures in proximal and distal ends brought out through crossed trocar sites with tension, allowing return within a week for anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 27:38
quote They published a series a year ago or so in JPS looking at their results, and, and it was a very carefully well documented report of their results, and the data are striking if you Have a patient who has a primary atresia that you address, then in 98% of patients they're able to get the two ends of the esophagus together. In contrast, if it's a patient who's had previous surgeries and it's a secondary approach, then only 2/3 of those patients ever get the esophagus together. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 27:38
clinical Foker technique requires patients intubated and paralyzed spending weeks in ICU, which is probably worth it if you get good result ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 27:38
epidemiological Rusty Jennings and Foker published series in JPS showing 98% success getting ends together in primary atresia versus only 67% in secondary approaches after previous surgeries ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 29:18
clinical Standard port placement: camera in center, posterior port inferiorly, anterior port superiorly ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 29:18
clinical For thoracoscopic procedure, rotate patient past 90 degrees to allow gravity to move lungs out of way ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 29:52
clinical Uses 3mm instruments for thoracoscopic TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 30:10
opinion Simulation courses for TEF repair will be great advantage for trainees as these cases are not done often enough to get practice ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 30:10
quote I think as with most minimally invasive operations, I think it's important to do the same operation or at least the same quality operation that you would do open and Frankly, I think that's one of the challenges with the thoracoscopic repair of a TEF is to actually sew the anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 30:10
quote I'm less worried about them falling off the esophagus than I am having them fall off a blood vessel. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 30:10
opinion Thoracoscopic visualization is very helpful for mobilizing proximal pouch ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 30:10
clinical Sewing the anastomosis is one of the challenges with thoracoscopic TEF repair and requires most experience with minimally invasive techniques ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 30:10
opinion Would use clips for dividing fistula thoracoscopically, less worried about them falling off esophagus than blood vessel ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 30:10
opinion Important to do same quality operation thoracoscopically as would do open ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 34:30
quote I think it's more dependent on the anesthesiologist than it is on the type of ventilator, and you have to have an anesthesiologist who's comfortable with doing this and understands what you're trying to accomplish and is paying attention while you're actually doing the operation because they can either help you a lot or hurt you a lot with how they ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 34:30
clinical Thoracoscopic ventilation management depends more on anesthesiologist than ventilator type; need anesthesiologist comfortable with procedure who pays attention during operation ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 35:20
clinical Little CO2 insufflation with some time will collapse lung as long as anesthesiologist isn't fighting with positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 35:20
clinical Anesthesiologists can get scared seeing initial shunting but things settle down if they wait ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 36:05
clinical Concern about reintubation exists, but equally concerned that positive pressure puts pressure on tracheal repair ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 36:05
opinion Prefer spontaneous breathing with negative pressure in trachea rather than positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 36:05
clinical If patient had good lung function preoperatively and operation went smoothly, advocate extubating as soon as possible, even conceivably in operating room ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 36:05
quote I agree it is a concern that the patient may require reintubation. However, I'm equally concerned that positive pressure is putting pressure on my tracheal repair, and I would much rather have the patient be breathing spontaneously to have, in fact, the opposite effect of a negative pressure in the trachea. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 36:35
clinical Gets contrast study at 5-7 days before pulling chest drain, timing depends on avoiding weekends ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 36:35
clinical Uses small TLS drain rather than formal chest tube, especially for open extrapleural approach ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 36:35
quote I do honestly, I'm a little bit old school in that. I still get an esophagram. I usually wait for about 5 days. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 37:20
clinical Does not use transanastomotic tube based on Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study showing much higher stricture and leak rate with transanastomotic tubes ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 37:20
quote I do not actually. I again, a practice of mine that has changed based on our results from the Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study in which the patients who Had a trans anastomotic tube had a much higher stricture and leak rate than patients that did not have that. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 37:37
clinical Midwest consortium study was presented at APSA and should be published in JPS soon ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 37:55
quote Unless it's an incredibly tight stricture, I would wait several weeks before doing a dilation unless I was worried there was going to be a complete obstruction. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 37:55
quote There's always reported a narrowing because the proximal pouch is always dilated, so it always looks like there's a narrowing at the anastomosis. As long as it's patent and contrast flows freely down the distal esophagus, I would hold off on. Uh, dialing it, dilating it probably several weeks if possible. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 37:55
clinical Always appears to be narrowing at anastomosis because proximal pouch is dilated; as long as patent with free contrast flow distally, would hold off on dilation ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 37:55
clinical Unless incredibly tight stricture risking complete obstruction, would wait several weeks before first dilation ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 38:23
clinical If case goes well and post-op study looks great, does not get routine follow-up esophagrams; studies based on clinical symptoms suggesting stricture ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 38:23
clinical Fairly aggressive with dilations: dilate, wait 1-2 weeks, restudy, potentially dilate again ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 38:23
clinical Huge spectrum from very tight strictures requiring many dilations to kids fine after one dilation ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 39:19
clinical Dilations done with GI colleagues in aerodigestive center for bigger kids or with interventional radiologists ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 39:19
clinical Balloon or radial dilation is less traumatic for tissue than bougie dilators ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 39:19
quote I think that again, having trained using bougie dilators, a balloon or radial dilation is, is less traumatic for the tissue ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 39:51
quote I would absolutely wait and do nothing. I would leave the drain in and usually that presents with some saliva in the drain, and I would just wait, and the vast majority of those close. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 39:51
clinical For small leak with child not sick, would absolutely wait and do nothing, leaving drain in; vast majority close ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 40:09
clinical Would only go to OR for leak if child getting sicker, wide open leak, or large uncontrollable pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 40:09
clinical Even reasonably significant leaks will heal, then can deal with stricture postoperatively ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 40:34
clinical Usually waits one week between esophagrams for leak; if child continues to do well, restudies ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 40:34
clinical Sometimes little outpouching where leak happened makes it unclear if still leaking; if nothing from tube and nothing goes further, leak probably healed and would remove tube ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 41:19
quote I think that first of all I would make the comment that that's a great point and it's interesting to participate in the International oesophageal atresia. A meeting that occurs every 2 years and to go and see the patients because that meeting is multidisciplinary, including even patients, and you see these patients who come back who are in their 20s or 30s or 40s and they talk about the long term issues that they have and we tend to follow patients until they're, you know, until they're eating well and then they're gone ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 41:19
clinical International esophageal atresia meeting occurs every 2 years and is multidisciplinary including patients ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 41:19
opinion Have a lot to learn about long-term complications; personally follows patients for at least couple years which is probably not long enough ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 41:19
clinical Patients in their 20s-40s at international meeting discuss long-term issues; surgeons tend to follow until eating well or age 18 then never see them again ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:15
clinical More concerning are patients with ongoing reflux due to unknown long-term impact on Barrett's esophagus and potential malignant change ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:15
quote The patients that worry me more honestly are the patients who have ongoing reflux, and we don't know the long term impact of that on things like Barrett's esophagus and Potential long term risk for malignant change and those sorts of things. ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:15
clinical Biggest challenges in long-term follow-up are reflux and recurrent strictures ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:45
quote If I have a patient who has a stricture that's been dilated 2 or 3 times, my next move would be to address reflux. Most of the patients we leave on anti-reflux medications when they are discharged from the hospital. I would argue that virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux. If they have a stricture that is not responsive to dilations, it dilates easily and then restrictures. I personally am very aggressive about doing a fundoplication on those patients ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:45
clinical Very aggressive about fundoplication for strictures not responsive to dilations (dilates easily then restrictures) ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:45
clinical Virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:45
clinical Most patients left on anti-reflux medications when discharged from hospital ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 42:45
clinical If patient has stricture dilated 2-3 times, next move would be to address reflux ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 43:26
clinical Does Nissen fundoplication in patients with poor esophageal motility but makes them loose and short, using 2 or at most 3 stitches ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 43:26
clinical For pure esophageal atresia, approach is G-tube placement with calibration of gap length using distal catheter pushed up and NG tube in proximal pouch ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 43:26
clinical Would wait 4-6 weeks to see how close ends come together, then attempt primary repair once within 2 vertebral bodies ↗
▶ Ep 21 · 43:26
quote I do, but as with most Nissans, I make them loose and I make them short, so I usually use two or at most 3 stitches for the wrap and make sure that it is loose around the distal esophagus. ↗
Daniel's statements about Esophageal Atresia 149 statements

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 2 · 1:36
quote It certainly is an interest that we have here with a whole group here in Cincinnati, but it can be an incredibly difficult, challenging problem. It's one of the great cases in pediatric surgery and one of the most difficult cases, so it really runs the whole spectrum for sure. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:01
clinical Cincinnati Children's has a multidisciplinary aerodigestive center including ENT airway surgeons, GI, pulmonary, general surgeons, nurse practitioners, geneticists, and dietitians ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:46
clinical The aerodigestive center typically receives more complicated patients referred from outside through either esophageal or airway arms ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 3:55
clinical Physical examination should assess for scaphoid versus full or distended abdomen and respiratory distress ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 4:20
clinical The surgeon should personally attempt to pass the NG tube rather than relying on nursing reports, as tubes reported as not passing sometimes pass easily ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 4:20
quote I personally like to try to pass the NG tube myself, having been burned with NG tubes that wouldn't go down, and the patient was started on treatment as an oesophageal atresia and subsequently found that the NG tube passes just fine. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 4:55
clinical Injecting air into the NG tube and obtaining a plain film helps visualize proximal pouch distention and assess distal GI gas pattern ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 5:01
clinical Lack of visible distended proximal pouch raises concern for either incorrect diagnosis or presence of proximal fistula allowing pouch decompression ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 5:01
quote If I can't see a distended proximal pouch, then I worry. I worry that either one of two things either that the diagnosis is incorrect and in fact it is not an esophageal atresia, or that there could be a proximal fistula which is allowing that proximal pouch to decompress. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 5:42
clinical Contrast studies can be performed if there is high suspicion of unusual anatomy, as long as the radiologist knows the esophagus may be obstructed ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:25
clinical Echocardiogram is the most important preoperative study to assess cardiac anatomy and rule out right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:25
quote The most important one prior to taking the patient to the operating room is to get an echocardiogram, and the utility of that is, is obviously to assess the cardiac anatomy, but more as importantly, I would say is to assess to be sure that the patient does not have a right-sided aortic arch. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:54
clinical Renal ultrasound and spine evaluation for tethered cord are needed but are elective and not necessary before addressing esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:27
guideline Conventional wisdom is to perform left thoracotomy for right-sided aortic arch ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:51
clinical Left thoracotomy for right-sided arch is somewhat more difficult with the heart more in the way and harder proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 8:20
clinical It is possible to complete the repair from the right side if right-sided arch is discovered intraoperatively, though some reports suggest higher incidence of swallowing problems ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 9:31
clinical In a stable larger baby not intubated, it is reasonable to wait until all resources are available in the middle of the day, even waiting 1-2 days ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 9:56
clinical Should not wait a long time before repair due to risk of colonizing GI tract and soiling lungs ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:15
clinical Large fistula with distention tends to be a bigger problem in more premature infants with significant lung disease, where poor lung compliance drives air into GI tract ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:15
opinion Oscillator ventilation does not make a significant difference in managing large fistulas with abdominal distention ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:15
quote I've not found personally that an oscillator makes a whole lot of difference. I think if the child has a, has a large fistula, and typically it's actually, I believe this tends to be a bigger problem in younger, that is more premature infants who have more significant lung disease, and their compliance of their lungs is really what drives the The air into the GI tract as opposed to into the lungs. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:56
clinical Treating with surfactant and improving lung compliance helps as much as changing ventilator type ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 11:21
quote I think this is a difficult clinical scenario, and, and I think one of the risks is to wait too long to make a decision, and I've made that mistake myself, and then it becomes an emergency if you can't ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 11:21
clinical Risk of waiting too long to make a decision in worsening distention can lead to emergency situation where child cannot be ventilated ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 12:00
quote Decompressing the stomach may just allow that to become, in effect, the even lower resistance and allow more air to go there, making it even more difficult to ventilate. You relieve the abdominal distention, but you don't fix the flow of gas from the Trachea to the GI tract as opposed to from the trachea to the lungs. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 12:00
clinical G-tube decompression may paradoxically worsen ventilation by making stomach lower resistance, allowing more air to go there instead of lungs ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 12:00
opinion Bronchoscopic Fogarty balloon placement sounds good but is difficult unless expertise and equipment are immediately available ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 12:00
clinical For reasonably stable but worsening distention, would take child urgently to OR for right thoracotomy and fistula ligation ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 12:50
clinical Laparotomy with vessel loop around esophagogastric junction at hiatus with gentle traction (Rommel tourniquet technique) can temporize severe cases, leaving in place for several days before definitive repair ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:36
clinical For associated duodenal atresia in stable child, would potentially fix duodenal atresia first to avoid fixing esophagus upstream from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:05
clinical Both duodenal and esophageal atresia could potentially be fixed at same time if child is old enough and stable enough ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:35
quote We have seen that many times in patients who are referred who've had multiple thoracotomies. Nobody ever did a bronchoscopy and the child actually has a laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:35
clinical Many referred patients with multiple thoracotomies never had bronchoscopy and actually have laryngeal cleft ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:35
clinical Bronchoscopy documents fistula location, assesses for proximal fistula, and most importantly rules out laryngeal cleft which is easily missed ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:35
clinical Von Allmen changed practice to always perform intraoperative bronchoscopy after exposure to Cincinnati's complex patient population ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 14:35
quote That is one of the things that I have changed in my management after coming here and having exposure to the patient population that we see, the complex patients that we see with the esophageal center and the neurodigestive center, and The airway surgeons here have convinced me that it is really important to do a bronchoscopy ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 15:35
epidemiological Second fistula occurs in approximately 1% of cases and can be very difficult to diagnose ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 15:52
clinical High fistulas can range from trifurcation of carina (suggesting difficulty getting ends together) to very high fistulas potentially approachable through neck ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 16:35
clinical For fistula at carina (trifurcation), ET tube should be placed higher as it cannot pass the fistula; for high fistula, tube should be placed distal to fistula but not into the fistula itself ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 16:35
clinical Bronchoscopy allows guidance of ET tube placement by anesthesiologist based on fistula location ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:19
clinical Extrapleural approach offers advantage of potentially limiting soilage of pleural space if there is postoperative leak ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:19
quote I do an extra plural approach and that's the way I was trained. I think it offers the advantage of potentially limiting any soilage of the plural space if there is a leak postoperatively. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:41
clinical Dividing azygos has no morbidity, gives better access, and frequently guides to the fistula ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:41
quote I think there's no morbidity associated with that, so dividing the azygus gives you better access. In fact, frequently will guide you to the fistula. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:59
clinical Open azygos division is done by ligation and division; thoracoscopically can use energy devices or clips ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:51
quote It is amazing what you can divide with the electric cautery, with the hook electric cautery if you just get used to it, and I learned that doing actually robotic Nissans that you can divide the short gastrics in a teenager with the with the hook electric cautery. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:51
clinical Hook cautery can safely divide vessels if done slowly going up and down to ensure coagulation, learned from robotic Nissen experience dividing short gastrics ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:51
opinion 3mm surgical sealer is ideal device for this size patient and vessel ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:35
clinical After azygos division, identify distal esophagus and control with vessel loop, then dissect proximally to identify fistula site ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:35
clinical Important to mobilize pleura up around apex of lung to have access for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:35
clinical Spreading heel of right angle on ribs nicely shows extrapleural plane when going through intercostal muscles ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 20:28
opinion Muscle-sparing thoracotomy can make exposure more difficult; has not seen significant morbidity from standard posterolateral thoracotomy ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:10
opinion Thoracoscopic approach advantage is clearer visualization for proximal pouch mobilization ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:10
clinical Must be careful with medial mobilization of distal esophagus due to blood supply concerns ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:10
quote I think we have learned that, you know, the standard teaching has been that you shouldn't mobilize the distal esophagus at all, and I think we've learned that in fact you can mobilize that segment a fair amount, especially laterally. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:10
clinical Extensive proximal pouch mobilization gives the most length to get ends together ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:10
clinical Standard teaching has been not to mobilize distal esophagus, but can actually mobilize it significantly especially laterally all the way to diaphragm ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 22:20
quote I completely agree, and I think that you have to be very careful. I personally like to just use a blade, electric cautery and with a little buzz and then mostly blunt dissection with the flat end of the blade, and I think that. That can help you and staying right on the esophagus, which is usually very thickened because it's an obstructed piece of bowel. I would rather be in the esophagus than be in the trachea up high in the chest. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 22:20
clinical Better to be in esophagus than trachea during high chest dissection; esophagus is thickened from obstruction ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 22:20
clinical Risk of entering trachea during proximal dissection; must be very careful using blade cautery with light buzz and mostly blunt dissection with flat end of blade ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:01
clinical For significant tracheal defect, could perform sleeve resection as trachea is incredibly mobile, then place pericardium or autologous tissue between trachea and esophageal repair ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:59
opinion Personal preference is 5-0 PDS - absorbable monofilament suture; not a fan of silk ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:42
opinion Not a fan of myotomies as they potentially create even more dysfunctional esophageal segment; motility is already clearly abnormal in esophageal atresia ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:42
clinical For cases too tight for primary repair, would ligate ends, tack both on tension to prevertebral fascia, close, let patient grow for couple weeks, then return to put together ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:42
quote I personally am not a big fan of myotomy. I think it. Potentially creates an even more dysfunctional segment of the esophagus than already exists. The motility is clearly abnormal in patients with oesophageal atresia, and doing a myotomy just makes that problem worse. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 25:38
quote I believe very firmly in the physiology of traction or pressure. Actually it's sort of the reverse, is a very strong stimulus to growth all over the place in the cardiovascular system in the lungs ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 25:38
clinical Traction or pressure is very strong stimulus to growth throughout cardiovascular system and lungs ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 26:10
opinion Would not do classic Foker technique with prolonged paralysis and sequential suture tensioning ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 26:10
clinical For thoracoscopic approach, can place traction sutures in proximal and distal ends brought out through crossed trocar sites with tension, allowing return within a week for anastomosis ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 27:38
quote They published a series a year ago or so in JPS looking at their results, and, and it was a very carefully well documented report of their results, and the data are striking if you Have a patient who has a primary atresia that you address, then in 98% of patients they're able to get the two ends of the esophagus together. In contrast, if it's a patient who's had previous surgeries and it's a secondary approach, then only 2/3 of those patients ever get the esophagus together. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 27:38
epidemiological Rusty Jennings and Foker published series in JPS showing 98% success getting ends together in primary atresia versus only 67% in secondary approaches after previous surgeries ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 27:38
clinical Foker technique requires patients intubated and paralyzed spending weeks in ICU, which is probably worth it if you get good result ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:18
clinical For thoracoscopic procedure, rotate patient past 90 degrees to allow gravity to move lungs out of way ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:18
clinical Standard port placement: camera in center, posterior port inferiorly, anterior port superiorly ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 29:52
clinical Uses 3mm instruments for thoracoscopic TEF repair ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:10
quote I think as with most minimally invasive operations, I think it's important to do the same operation or at least the same quality operation that you would do open and Frankly, I think that's one of the challenges with the thoracoscopic repair of a TEF is to actually sew the anastomosis. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:10
quote I'm less worried about them falling off the esophagus than I am having them fall off a blood vessel. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:10
clinical Sewing the anastomosis is one of the challenges with thoracoscopic TEF repair and requires most experience with minimally invasive techniques ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:10
opinion Would use clips for dividing fistula thoracoscopically, less worried about them falling off esophagus than blood vessel ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:10
opinion Thoracoscopic visualization is very helpful for mobilizing proximal pouch ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:10
opinion Simulation courses for TEF repair will be great advantage for trainees as these cases are not done often enough to get practice ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 30:10
opinion Important to do same quality operation thoracoscopically as would do open ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:30
clinical Thoracoscopic ventilation management depends more on anesthesiologist than ventilator type; need anesthesiologist comfortable with procedure who pays attention during operation ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 34:30
quote I think it's more dependent on the anesthesiologist than it is on the type of ventilator, and you have to have an anesthesiologist who's comfortable with doing this and understands what you're trying to accomplish and is paying attention while you're actually doing the operation because they can either help you a lot or hurt you a lot with how they ventilate the child. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 35:20
clinical Little CO2 insufflation with some time will collapse lung as long as anesthesiologist isn't fighting with positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 35:20
clinical Anesthesiologists can get scared seeing initial shunting but things settle down if they wait ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:05
clinical If patient had good lung function preoperatively and operation went smoothly, advocate extubating as soon as possible, even conceivably in operating room ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:05
opinion Prefer spontaneous breathing with negative pressure in trachea rather than positive pressure ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:05
clinical Concern about reintubation exists, but equally concerned that positive pressure puts pressure on tracheal repair ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:05
quote I agree it is a concern that the patient may require reintubation. However, I'm equally concerned that positive pressure is putting pressure on my tracheal repair, and I would much rather have the patient be breathing spontaneously to have, in fact, the opposite effect of a negative pressure in the trachea. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:35
quote I do honestly, I'm a little bit old school in that. I still get an esophagram. I usually wait for about 5 days. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:35
clinical Uses small TLS drain rather than formal chest tube, especially for open extrapleural approach ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 36:35
clinical Gets contrast study at 5-7 days before pulling chest drain, timing depends on avoiding weekends ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:20
clinical Does not use transanastomotic tube based on Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study showing much higher stricture and leak rate with transanastomotic tubes ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:20
quote I do not actually. I again, a practice of mine that has changed based on our results from the Midwest Pediatric Surgical Consortium study in which the patients who Had a trans anastomotic tube had a much higher stricture and leak rate than patients that did not have that. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:37
clinical Midwest consortium study was presented at APSA and should be published in JPS soon ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:55
clinical Unless incredibly tight stricture risking complete obstruction, would wait several weeks before first dilation ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:55
clinical Always appears to be narrowing at anastomosis because proximal pouch is dilated; as long as patent with free contrast flow distally, would hold off on dilation ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:55
quote Unless it's an incredibly tight stricture, I would wait several weeks before doing a dilation unless I was worried there was going to be a complete obstruction. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 37:55
quote There's always reported a narrowing because the proximal pouch is always dilated, so it always looks like there's a narrowing at the anastomosis. As long as it's patent and contrast flows freely down the distal esophagus, I would hold off on. Uh, dialing it, dilating it probably several weeks if possible. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:23
clinical If case goes well and post-op study looks great, does not get routine follow-up esophagrams; studies based on clinical symptoms suggesting stricture ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:23
clinical Fairly aggressive with dilations: dilate, wait 1-2 weeks, restudy, potentially dilate again ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 38:23
clinical Huge spectrum from very tight strictures requiring many dilations to kids fine after one dilation ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:19
clinical Balloon or radial dilation is less traumatic for tissue than bougie dilators ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:19
quote I think that again, having trained using bougie dilators, a balloon or radial dilation is, is less traumatic for the tissue ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:19
clinical Dilations done with GI colleagues in aerodigestive center for bigger kids or with interventional radiologists ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:51
clinical For small leak with child not sick, would absolutely wait and do nothing, leaving drain in; vast majority close ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 39:51
quote I would absolutely wait and do nothing. I would leave the drain in and usually that presents with some saliva in the drain, and I would just wait, and the vast majority of those close. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 40:09
clinical Even reasonably significant leaks will heal, then can deal with stricture postoperatively ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 40:09
clinical Would only go to OR for leak if child getting sicker, wide open leak, or large uncontrollable pneumothorax ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 40:34
clinical Usually waits one week between esophagrams for leak; if child continues to do well, restudies ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 40:34
clinical Sometimes little outpouching where leak happened makes it unclear if still leaking; if nothing from tube and nothing goes further, leak probably healed and would remove tube ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 41:19
clinical International esophageal atresia meeting occurs every 2 years and is multidisciplinary including patients ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 41:19
clinical Patients in their 20s-40s at international meeting discuss long-term issues; surgeons tend to follow until eating well or age 18 then never see them again ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 41:19
opinion Have a lot to learn about long-term complications; personally follows patients for at least couple years which is probably not long enough ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 41:19
quote I think that first of all I would make the comment that that's a great point and it's interesting to participate in the International oesophageal atresia. A meeting that occurs every 2 years and to go and see the patients because that meeting is multidisciplinary, including even patients, and you see these patients who come back who are in their 20s or 30s or 40s and they talk about the long term issues that they have and we tend to follow patients until they're, you know, until they're eating well and then they're gone ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:15
clinical More concerning are patients with ongoing reflux due to unknown long-term impact on Barrett's esophagus and potential malignant change ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:15
clinical Biggest challenges in long-term follow-up are reflux and recurrent strictures ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:15
quote The patients that worry me more honestly are the patients who have ongoing reflux, and we don't know the long term impact of that on things like Barrett's esophagus and Potential long term risk for malignant change and those sorts of things. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:45
quote If I have a patient who has a stricture that's been dilated 2 or 3 times, my next move would be to address reflux. Most of the patients we leave on anti-reflux medications when they are discharged from the hospital. I would argue that virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux. If they have a stricture that is not responsive to dilations, it dilates easily and then restrictures. I personally am very aggressive about doing a fundoplication on those patients ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:45
clinical Virtually all patients have some degree of gastroesophageal reflux ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:45
clinical Very aggressive about fundoplication for strictures not responsive to dilations (dilates easily then restrictures) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:45
clinical Most patients left on anti-reflux medications when discharged from hospital ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 42:45
clinical If patient has stricture dilated 2-3 times, next move would be to address reflux ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 43:26
clinical Does Nissen fundoplication in patients with poor esophageal motility but makes them loose and short, using 2 or at most 3 stitches ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 43:26
clinical Would wait 4-6 weeks to see how close ends come together, then attempt primary repair once within 2 vertebral bodies ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 43:26
quote I do, but as with most Nissans, I make them loose and I make them short, so I usually use two or at most 3 stitches for the wrap and make sure that it is loose around the distal esophagus. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 43:26
clinical For pure esophageal atresia, approach is G-tube placement with calibration of gap length using distal catheter pushed up and NG tube in proximal pouch ↗

Treatment for Long Gap Esophageal Atresia: Esophageal Elongation and Replacement

▶ Ep 5 · 0:46
clinical At Cincinnati Children's, if a child has no gas in the abdomen, they place a G-tube and may put something up the distal esophagus for a fluoro shot, then wait a couple of weeks for a protocol gap measurement in interventional radiology. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 0:46
quote Our method here is that if we have a child with no gas in the abdomen and we take them to the OR and put a G-tube in, many times we'll do, we'll put something up the distal esophagus at that point and just get a fluoro shot. But then we'd wait a couple of weeks and we have our patients go down to interventional radiology where we have a protocol for measuring the gap. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:10
quote But the philosophy here is that with traction, you can get the two ends of the esophagus to grow. And if you can get them to grow far enough, you can put them together. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:10
quote The physiology, which I believe in intensely, is that stretch is a very strong promoter of growth. And then if you put things on tension, they will actually grow over time. That's how the cardiovascular system develops in utero. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:10
clinical The philosophy of traction-based elongation is that with traction, you can get the two ends of the esophagus to grow, and if you can get them to grow far enough, you can put them together. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:10
clinical Stretch is a very strong promoter of growth, and if you put things on tension they will actually grow over time, which is how the cardiovascular system develops in utero. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:36
clinical The colon can be used as an interposition for esophageal replacement. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:36
quote You can actually use the colon as an interposition as well. I personally was trained to do colon interpositions. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:00
quote Common problems with this are that they dilate and they can become tortuous. It's not uncommon to get kind of a sigmoid sink drain deformity just above the diaphragm. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:00
clinical Common problems with colonic interposition are that the colon can dilate and become tortuous, and it's not uncommon to get a sigmoid sink drain deformity just above the diaphragm. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:17
opinion Colonic interpositions sometimes need to be revised, but it is not impossible to revise them and the kids tend to do pretty well. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:17
quote I was taught initially that you can't fix that and that it's too dangerous and that you'll risk the blood supply to the colon interposition. But I found that actually that's not really true. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:17
quote I pass the interposition posterior to the stomach, which leaves the vascular pedicle along the spine. And you can mobilize the colon. You can divide the gastric dual aporotomy, divide the colon attachment to the stomach, and then mobilize that sigmoid redundancy transhiatally, and then reinestimose the colon to the stomach. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:17
quote So I wouldn't pretend to say that these don't need to be revised sometimes, but it is not impossible to revise them and the kids tend to do pretty well. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:17
clinical Von Allman passes the colonic interposition posterior to the stomach, which leaves the vascular pedicle along the spine, allowing mobilization of the colon by dividing the gastric duodenotomy and colon attachment to the stomach, then mobilizing the sigmoid redundancy transhiatally and reanastomosing the colon to the stomach. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:17
opinion Von Allman was initially taught that sigmoid redundancy in colonic interposition can't be fixed and that it's too dangerous because it will risk the blood supply, but he found that this is not really true. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:03
clinical You can get extraordinary length with colonic interposition, allowing treatment of cases with caustic injuries extending to the pharynx by sewing the colon to the pharynx and down to the stomach, which is tough to do with a gastric pull-up. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:03
quote You can get extraordinary length on this. And Mike and I have done a few cases for kids who had disasters, multiple operations elsewhere, who had caustic injuries that were involved all the way up to the pharynx, where we had to do a lot of work just on the pharynx to get that open, and then literally sew the colon interposition to the pharynx and then down to the stomach, which is obviously tough to do with a gastric pull-up. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:56
quote And yet there's very good physiologic data that tension is a growth promoter, not necessarily in the esophagus, but in other organs. So I think that it's an area ripe for a little more basic science. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:56
opinion Von Allman states we don't know whether esophageal elongation is growth or stretch and should do studies to understand that, but notes that tension is a very good physiologic growth promoter in other organs, making this an area ripe for more basic science. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:56
quote I don't think we know we should do the studies to understand that. But I would say that this gets back to David van der Zee's comment about, go have a cup of coffee and come back and it'll be fine. Clearly, that's not growth, that's stretch. ↗
Daniel's statements about Etiologies (Gastroschisis/NEC/Atresia/Volvulus) 6 statements

Open the Etiologies (Gastroschisis/NEC/Atresia/Volvulus) collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 26 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about Gastroesophageal Reflux 7 statements

Open the Gastroesophageal Reflux collection →

Gastoesophageal Reflux: Update Course 2015

▶ Ep 1 · 10:09
quote Do they have data to support that statement, the significant morbidity? ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 10:15
quote There's lots of articles that many in this room have authored that show that the immediate morbidity and mortality of a fundoplication, of a laparoscopic fundoplication, even in infants is very low. It's a safe operation. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 10:15
clinical Immediate morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic fundoplication, even in infants, is very low and it is a safe operation ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 16:28
clinical PPIs do not stop vomiting; they make refluxed material less acidic ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 16:28
quote Do PPIs stop vomiting? No. I, I never understood that acid reflux less acidic, right? ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 25:20
quote I started doing is I put an NG tube down, and if they do well with an NG tube, I just do a G tube. If they don't, I do a Nissan. That's as simple as I make it. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 25:40
clinical Trial of bolus NG tube feeding predicts whether infant needs fundoplication: if they do well with NG tube, perform G-tube alone; if they don't, perform Nissen ↗
Daniel's statements about Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 7 statements

Open the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease collection →

Gastoesophageal Reflux: Update Course 2015

▶ Ep 5 · 10:09
quote Do they have data to support that statement, the significant morbidity? ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 10:15
clinical Immediate morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic fundoplication, even in infants, is very low and it is a safe operation ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 10:15
quote There's lots of articles that many in this room have authored that show that the immediate morbidity and mortality of a fundoplication, of a laparoscopic fundoplication, even in infants is very low. It's a safe operation. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 16:28
quote Do PPIs stop vomiting? No. I, I never understood that acid reflux less acidic, right? ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 16:28
clinical PPIs do not stop vomiting; they make refluxed material less acidic ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 25:20
quote I started doing is I put an NG tube down, and if they do well with an NG tube, I just do a G tube. If they don't, I do a Nissan. That's as simple as I make it. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 25:40
clinical Trial of bolus NG tube feeding predicts whether infant needs fundoplication: if they do well with NG tube, perform G-tube alone; if they don't, perform Nissen ↗
Daniel's statements about Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 7 statements

Open the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease collection →

Gastoesophageal Reflux: Update Course 2015

▶ Ep 5 · 10:09
quote Do they have data to support that statement, the significant morbidity? ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 10:15
quote There's lots of articles that many in this room have authored that show that the immediate morbidity and mortality of a fundoplication, of a laparoscopic fundoplication, even in infants is very low. It's a safe operation. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 10:15
clinical Immediate morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic fundoplication, even in infants, is very low and it is a safe operation ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 16:28
quote Do PPIs stop vomiting? No. I, I never understood that acid reflux less acidic, right? ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 16:28
clinical PPIs do not stop vomiting; they make refluxed material less acidic ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 25:20
quote I started doing is I put an NG tube down, and if they do well with an NG tube, I just do a G tube. If they don't, I do a Nissan. That's as simple as I make it. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 25:40
clinical Trial of bolus NG tube feeding predicts whether infant needs fundoplication: if they do well with NG tube, perform G-tube alone; if they don't, perform Nissen ↗
Daniel's statements about High-risk Neuroblastoma 14 statements

Open the High-risk Neuroblastoma collection →

Neuroblastoma: Update Course 2014

▶ Ep 2 · 0:34
quote I think that the, the main controversy, at least from my perspective, that still persists is what to do with the high-risk patients. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 0:42
epidemiological Survival rate for high-risk neuroblastoma patients is in the 38 to 40% range ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:31
quote The difference between what a surgeon says they did in the operating room and and what the postoperative imaging says they did in the operating room, and those are not necessarily the same. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:52
clinical Surgeon-reported degree of resection showed only 66% concordance with radiologist assessment of postoperative imaging in tandem transplant pilot study ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:33
clinical Repeat study in recent COG high-risk trial showed same 66% concordance rate between surgeon op notes and postoperative imaging, with surgeons underestimating and radiologists overcalling resection completeness ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 8:16
quote We don't have a very good definition of what is a greater than 90% resection. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:17
opinion More chemotherapy or other agents like MIBG may make tumor more fibrotic and make subadventitial dissection more difficult ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:17
quote The more chemotherapy you give or other agents, and now things like MIBG, which is local radiation, um. Uh, that you actually make the tumor more fibrotic, and it makes that technique of getting down on the vessels and splitting it off much more difficult. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:07
epidemiological Complication rate for aggressive neuroblastoma resection is approximately 30% morbidity with mortality less than 1% ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 15:10
clinical High-risk neuroblastoma treatment includes tandem peripheral blood stem cell transplants, with second transplant given as soon as patient recovers from first, followed by immunotherapy and Retin-A ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:37
quote This is very important to support the aggressive approach that everybody in this room has suggested that they would, uh, that they would pursue. There actually now is some data to support that. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:56
opinion COG 3973 study's inability to demonstrate overall survival benefit may be type 2 error due to smaller sample size (230 vs 1,300 patients in European study) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:30
quote If you're not comfortable taking care of them, you should send them to somebody that is. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 25:38
clinical Immunotherapy is effective in neuroblastoma in the setting of minimal residual disease ↗
Daniel's statements about Intestinal Failure 12 statements

Open the Intestinal Failure collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 3 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 7 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about Intestinal Rehab 12 statements

Open the Intestinal Rehab collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 14 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 35 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about Intestinal Transplant 6 statements

Open the Intestinal Transplant collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 4 · 5:31
opinion Dr. von Almen personally used steroids after Kasai in the past but has stopped based on the START trial results. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 5:31
quote I personally used to use them in my practice, but based on this study have stopped using them. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 8:01
quote The whole point of this is to preserve the native liver. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 9:09
clinical Two proposed mechanisms for steroid benefit in biliary atresia: reducing ongoing inflammation to preserve ductules, and acting as a choleretic to maintain bile flow (analogous to diuresis after kidney transplant). ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 10:08
quote I think that you have to always be careful about generalizing studies, and in this study it is specifically testing a fairly long course, 1413 week course of high dose steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 10:09
clinical The START trial specifically tested a 13-week course of high-dose steroids; the lack of benefit applies to that regimen. ↗
Daniel's statements about Long-gap Esophageal Atresia 21 statements

Open the Long-gap Esophageal Atresia collection →

Treatment for Long Gap Esophageal Atresia: Esophageal Elongation and Replacement

▶ Ep 3 · 0:46
clinical At Cincinnati Children's, if a child has no gas in the abdomen, they place a G-tube and may put something up the distal esophagus for a fluoro shot, then wait a couple of weeks for a protocol gap measurement in interventional radiology. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:46
quote Our method here is that if we have a child with no gas in the abdomen and we take them to the OR and put a G-tube in, many times we'll do, we'll put something up the distal esophagus at that point and just get a fluoro shot. But then we'd wait a couple of weeks and we have our patients go down to interventional radiology where we have a protocol for measuring the gap. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
quote But the philosophy here is that with traction, you can get the two ends of the esophagus to grow. And if you can get them to grow far enough, you can put them together. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
quote The physiology, which I believe in intensely, is that stretch is a very strong promoter of growth. And then if you put things on tension, they will actually grow over time. That's how the cardiovascular system develops in utero. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
clinical The philosophy of traction-based elongation is that with traction, you can get the two ends of the esophagus to grow, and if you can get them to grow far enough, you can put them together. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
clinical Stretch is a very strong promoter of growth, and if you put things on tension they will actually grow over time, which is how the cardiovascular system develops in utero. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
clinical The colon can be used as an interposition for esophageal replacement. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
quote You can actually use the colon as an interposition as well. I personally was trained to do colon interpositions. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:00
quote Common problems with this are that they dilate and they can become tortuous. It's not uncommon to get kind of a sigmoid sink drain deformity just above the diaphragm. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:00
clinical Common problems with colonic interposition are that the colon can dilate and become tortuous, and it's not uncommon to get a sigmoid sink drain deformity just above the diaphragm. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
opinion Von Allman was initially taught that sigmoid redundancy in colonic interposition can't be fixed and that it's too dangerous because it will risk the blood supply, but he found that this is not really true. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
opinion Colonic interpositions sometimes need to be revised, but it is not impossible to revise them and the kids tend to do pretty well. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
quote I pass the interposition posterior to the stomach, which leaves the vascular pedicle along the spine. And you can mobilize the colon. You can divide the gastric dual aporotomy, divide the colon attachment to the stomach, and then mobilize that sigmoid redundancy transhiatally, and then reinestimose the colon to the stomach. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
quote I was taught initially that you can't fix that and that it's too dangerous and that you'll risk the blood supply to the colon interposition. But I found that actually that's not really true. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
clinical Von Allman passes the colonic interposition posterior to the stomach, which leaves the vascular pedicle along the spine, allowing mobilization of the colon by dividing the gastric duodenotomy and colon attachment to the stomach, then mobilizing the sigmoid redundancy transhiatally and reanastomosing the colon to the stomach. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
quote So I wouldn't pretend to say that these don't need to be revised sometimes, but it is not impossible to revise them and the kids tend to do pretty well. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:03
quote You can get extraordinary length on this. And Mike and I have done a few cases for kids who had disasters, multiple operations elsewhere, who had caustic injuries that were involved all the way up to the pharynx, where we had to do a lot of work just on the pharynx to get that open, and then literally sew the colon interposition to the pharynx and then down to the stomach, which is obviously tough to do with a gastric pull-up. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:03
clinical You can get extraordinary length with colonic interposition, allowing treatment of cases with caustic injuries extending to the pharynx by sewing the colon to the pharynx and down to the stomach, which is tough to do with a gastric pull-up. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:56
quote And yet there's very good physiologic data that tension is a growth promoter, not necessarily in the esophagus, but in other organs. So I think that it's an area ripe for a little more basic science. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:56
opinion Von Allman states we don't know whether esophageal elongation is growth or stretch and should do studies to understand that, but notes that tension is a very good physiologic growth promoter in other organs, making this an area ripe for more basic science. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:56
quote I don't think we know we should do the studies to understand that. But I would say that this gets back to David van der Zee's comment about, go have a cup of coffee and come back and it'll be fine. Clearly, that's not growth, that's stretch. ↗
Daniel's statements about Long Gap Esophageal Atresia 23 statements

Open the Long Gap Esophageal Atresia collection →

Treatment for Long Gap Esophageal Atresia: Esophageal Elongation and Replacement

▶ Ep 3 · 0:46
quote Our method here is that if we have a child with no gas in the abdomen and we take them to the OR and put a G-tube in, many times we'll do, we'll put something up the distal esophagus at that point and just get a fluoro shot. But then we'd wait a couple of weeks and we have our patients go down to interventional radiology where we have a protocol for measuring the gap. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 0:46
clinical At Cincinnati Children's, if a child has no gas in the abdomen, they place a G-tube and may put something up the distal esophagus for a fluoro shot, then wait a couple of weeks for a protocol gap measurement in interventional radiology. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
quote The physiology, which I believe in intensely, is that stretch is a very strong promoter of growth. And then if you put things on tension, they will actually grow over time. That's how the cardiovascular system develops in utero. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
clinical Stretch is a very strong promoter of growth, and if you put things on tension they will actually grow over time, which is how the cardiovascular system develops in utero. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
clinical The philosophy of traction-based elongation is that with traction, you can get the two ends of the esophagus to grow, and if you can get them to grow far enough, you can put them together. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:10
quote But the philosophy here is that with traction, you can get the two ends of the esophagus to grow. And if you can get them to grow far enough, you can put them together. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
quote You can actually use the colon as an interposition as well. I personally was trained to do colon interpositions. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
clinical The colon can be used as an interposition for esophageal replacement. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:00
quote Common problems with this are that they dilate and they can become tortuous. It's not uncommon to get kind of a sigmoid sink drain deformity just above the diaphragm. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:00
clinical Common problems with colonic interposition are that the colon can dilate and become tortuous, and it's not uncommon to get a sigmoid sink drain deformity just above the diaphragm. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
quote I was taught initially that you can't fix that and that it's too dangerous and that you'll risk the blood supply to the colon interposition. But I found that actually that's not really true. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
opinion Von Allman was initially taught that sigmoid redundancy in colonic interposition can't be fixed and that it's too dangerous because it will risk the blood supply, but he found that this is not really true. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
clinical Von Allman passes the colonic interposition posterior to the stomach, which leaves the vascular pedicle along the spine, allowing mobilization of the colon by dividing the gastric duodenotomy and colon attachment to the stomach, then mobilizing the sigmoid redundancy transhiatally and reanastomosing the colon to the stomach. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
opinion Colonic interpositions sometimes need to be revised, but it is not impossible to revise them and the kids tend to do pretty well. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
quote So I wouldn't pretend to say that these don't need to be revised sometimes, but it is not impossible to revise them and the kids tend to do pretty well. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:17
quote I pass the interposition posterior to the stomach, which leaves the vascular pedicle along the spine. And you can mobilize the colon. You can divide the gastric dual aporotomy, divide the colon attachment to the stomach, and then mobilize that sigmoid redundancy transhiatally, and then reinestimose the colon to the stomach. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:03
quote You can get extraordinary length on this. And Mike and I have done a few cases for kids who had disasters, multiple operations elsewhere, who had caustic injuries that were involved all the way up to the pharynx, where we had to do a lot of work just on the pharynx to get that open, and then literally sew the colon interposition to the pharynx and then down to the stomach, which is obviously tough to do with a gastric pull-up. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:03
clinical You can get extraordinary length with colonic interposition, allowing treatment of cases with caustic injuries extending to the pharynx by sewing the colon to the pharynx and down to the stomach, which is tough to do with a gastric pull-up. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:56
opinion Von Allman states we don't know whether esophageal elongation is growth or stretch and should do studies to understand that, but notes that tension is a very good physiologic growth promoter in other organs, making this an area ripe for more basic science. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:56
quote And yet there's very good physiologic data that tension is a growth promoter, not necessarily in the esophagus, but in other organs. So I think that it's an area ripe for a little more basic science. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 9:56
quote I don't think we know we should do the studies to understand that. But I would say that this gets back to David van der Zee's comment about, go have a cup of coffee and come back and it'll be fine. Clearly, that's not growth, that's stretch. ↗

Update Course 2021: MAGNET THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL ATRESIA

▶ Ep 4 · 0:50
quote we're going to finish up once again with a completely non controversial topic for which the therapy is very straightforward and that is long gap esophagial atresia. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 21:07
clinical Dr. Von Allmen's single magnet case worked but resulted in dense stricture requiring lots of dilation and G-tube feeds for long time, though avoided reoperation. ↗
Daniel's statements about Metastatic Disease 37 statements

Open the Metastatic Disease collection →

Topics in 10: Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 1 · 0:41
clinical When neuroblastoma patients have metastatic disease, they may present with either bony pain or potentially neurologic symptoms from cord compression. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:41
clinical In younger patients, neuroblastoma is often picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids (two-year-old or three-year-old) as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 0:41
quote So in the younger patients, they're oftentimes picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids, say two-year-old or three-year-old, it might be picked up as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:07
clinical When considering neuroblastoma as part of the differential diagnosis, it is important to get catecholamines (either urine or serum) as one of the most diagnostic laboratory tests for this tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:39
clinical Most children with suspected neuroblastoma would get a cross-sectional imaging study, either a CT scan or an MRI. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:39
clinical If imaging suggests neuroblastoma (central abdominal mass or adrenal mass rather than kidney mass), the next test would be a nuclear medicine study, typically an MIBG study. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 1:39
clinical The MIBG study is helpful for confirming the diagnosis of neuroblastoma and can also demonstrate metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:20
clinical Some centers, including Cincinnati Children's Hospital, would get a PET scan looking for tumor uptake as well as potential metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:20
clinical About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:20
quote About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:45
guideline There is a special category MS for children less than 18 months of age who have metastases to either the bone marrow or the skin. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:45
guideline Based on the most recent iteration of the neuroblastoma staging system (INRGSS), it is possible to assign a stage before any invasive procedure is performed. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:45
guideline In the INRGSS system, tumors that are localized are categorized as L1; if localized but have image-defined risk factors (encasing nerves or vessels), they are L2; if they have metastatic disease, they are M. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 3:36
guideline The INRGSS pre-biopsy staging system was specifically created to allow studies from different centers in different countries to be compared based on the pre-surgical staging of the patient. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 3:36
guideline The prior neuroblastoma staging system required tissue diagnosis before assigning a stage. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:06
clinical A child with an adrenal mass on the right side and a positive MIBG scan but no evidence of metastases could potentially be treated with a primary resection of the mass via laparotomy. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:06
opinion Some surgeons would approach resection of a localized neuroblastoma with laparoscopy depending on the size of the tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 4:44
clinical For very large masses that encase the aorta, cava, or other major vasculature, all you really want is tissue for diagnosis, which can be obtained through open biopsy, laparoscopic biopsy, or core needle biopsies done by an interventional radiologist. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:14
clinical In addition to NMIC status, you want to look for 1P and 11Q deletions and Shimada histology in neuroblastoma biopsy tissue. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:14
clinical The most important biologic risk determinant to obtain from neuroblastoma biopsy tissue is the NMIC status. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:45
clinical Biologic risk determinants from biopsy will tell you what risk category the patient falls into: very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 5:45
epidemiological Neuroblastoma risk is divided about 50-50 between the low risk categories and the high risk category, with a smaller percentage being intermediate risk. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:11
quote NMIC and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:11
clinical Patients with high risk neuroblastoma receive aggressive chemotherapy including peripheral stem cell transplant times 2, aggressive surgery with the goal of greater than 90% resection of the tumor, followed by radiation, immunotherapy after chemotherapy, and potentially retinoic acid therapy. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:11
clinical NMIC amplification and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:51
clinical Intermediate risk neuroblastoma tumors get varying cycles of chemotherapy based on the biologic risk factors they have. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:51
clinical For intermediate risk neuroblastoma, the goal at the time of debulking or resecting the primary tumor is to achieve at least a 50% response from the initial volume of the primary tumor through the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:22
clinical The low risk neuroblastoma group, depending on the actual age of the patient and how it is diagnosed, could potentially be followed simply with observation. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:22
clinical Jed Nocturne led a study through the Children's Oncology Group looking at patients less than six months of age with either a prenatally diagnosed or shortly postnatally diagnosed localized mass, showing these patients can be observed with the expectation that the vast majority will avoid any type of surgical procedure. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical If the metastatic disease is progressing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, then surgery is not indicated. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
quote MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow, specifically not bone, not cortical bone, and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical If the tumor and metastatic disease are responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, one would attack the primary tumor site with a resection, with many advocating for attempting a greater than 90% resection. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical Patients with metastatic neuroblastoma typically receive four or five cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then are reassessed. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow (specifically not bone, not cortical bone) and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical In patients with MS disease, simple observation can be the treatment path. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 7:55
clinical If MS disease patients progress or develop respiratory issues because of an enlarging liver mass, treatment might be elected because of the complication of the size of the tumor, but the tumor itself usually does not have to be treated. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:55
clinical You can biopsy the skin lesions in MS disease and that will give you the diagnosis. ↗
Daniel's statements about Neuroblastoma 102 statements

Open the Neuroblastoma collection →

Neuroblastoma: Update Course 2014

▶ Ep 2 · 0:34
quote I think that the, the main controversy, at least from my perspective, that still persists is what to do with the high-risk patients. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 0:34
quote I think that the, the main controversy, at least from my perspective, that still persists is what to do with the high-risk patients. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 0:42
epidemiological Survival rate for high-risk neuroblastoma patients is in the 38 to 40% range ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 0:42
epidemiological Survival rate for high-risk neuroblastoma patients is in the 38 to 40% range ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:31
quote The difference between what a surgeon says they did in the operating room and and what the postoperative imaging says they did in the operating room, and those are not necessarily the same. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:31
quote The difference between what a surgeon says they did in the operating room and and what the postoperative imaging says they did in the operating room, and those are not necessarily the same. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:52
clinical Surgeon-reported degree of resection showed only 66% concordance with radiologist assessment of postoperative imaging in tandem transplant pilot study ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:52
clinical Surgeon-reported degree of resection showed only 66% concordance with radiologist assessment of postoperative imaging in tandem transplant pilot study ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:33
clinical Repeat study in recent COG high-risk trial showed same 66% concordance rate between surgeon op notes and postoperative imaging, with surgeons underestimating and radiologists overcalling resection completeness ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:33
clinical Repeat study in recent COG high-risk trial showed same 66% concordance rate between surgeon op notes and postoperative imaging, with surgeons underestimating and radiologists overcalling resection completeness ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 8:16
quote We don't have a very good definition of what is a greater than 90% resection. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 8:16
quote We don't have a very good definition of what is a greater than 90% resection. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:00
clinical Memorial Sloan Kettering data suggests biggest volume response of neuroblastoma tumor occurs with first two cycles of chemotherapy, with very little response after that ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:17
quote The more chemotherapy you give or other agents, and now things like MIBG, which is local radiation, um. Uh, that you actually make the tumor more fibrotic, and it makes that technique of getting down on the vessels and splitting it off much more difficult. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:17
opinion More chemotherapy or other agents like MIBG may make tumor more fibrotic and make subadventitial dissection more difficult ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:17
quote The more chemotherapy you give or other agents, and now things like MIBG, which is local radiation, um. Uh, that you actually make the tumor more fibrotic, and it makes that technique of getting down on the vessels and splitting it off much more difficult. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 10:17
opinion More chemotherapy or other agents like MIBG may make tumor more fibrotic and make subadventitial dissection more difficult ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:07
epidemiological Complication rate for aggressive neuroblastoma resection is approximately 30% morbidity with mortality less than 1% ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 13:07
epidemiological Complication rate for aggressive neuroblastoma resection is approximately 30% morbidity with mortality less than 1% ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 15:10
clinical High-risk neuroblastoma treatment includes tandem peripheral blood stem cell transplants, with second transplant given as soon as patient recovers from first, followed by immunotherapy and Retin-A ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 15:10
clinical High-risk neuroblastoma treatment includes tandem peripheral blood stem cell transplants, with second transplant given as soon as patient recovers from first, followed by immunotherapy and Retin-A ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 16:48
clinical German study of 278 stage 4 high-risk neuroblastoma patients achieved complete resection in almost half and >90% resection in another quarter (75% total with >90% resection) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:13
epidemiological German study showed overall survival 45%, event-free survival 33%, and local progression-free survival 58% in stage 4 neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:32
clinical German study showed no difference in overall survival, event-free survival, or local progression-free survival based on completeness of resection in stage 4 neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:51
guideline German study concluded aggressive surgery is not justified in stage 4 neuroblastoma, that limited operations decrease complications, and there is limited impact on patient outcome ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:14
clinical European study included 1,324 high-risk neuroblastoma patients (stages 2, 3, and 4) and achieved 76% with >95% resection ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:02
epidemiological European neuroblastoma study showed 0.5% mortality and 10% morbidity (30% including lesser complications) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:17
clinical European study showed significant improvement in event-free survival and overall survival with aggressive resection in high-risk neuroblastoma - first study to show overall survival benefit ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:37
quote This is very important to support the aggressive approach that everybody in this room has suggested that they would, uh, that they would pursue. There actually now is some data to support that. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:37
quote This is very important to support the aggressive approach that everybody in this room has suggested that they would, uh, that they would pursue. There actually now is some data to support that. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 20:17
clinical European study concluded >95% resection results in improvement in event-free survival in high-risk neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:24
clinical COG 3973 study of approximately 230 high-risk neuroblastoma patients showed significant improvement in local relapse-free survival and event-free survival but not overall survival ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:56
opinion COG 3973 study's inability to demonstrate overall survival benefit may be type 2 error due to smaller sample size (230 vs 1,300 patients in European study) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:56
opinion COG 3973 study's inability to demonstrate overall survival benefit may be type 2 error due to smaller sample size (230 vs 1,300 patients in European study) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:30
quote If you're not comfortable taking care of them, you should send them to somebody that is. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:30
quote If you're not comfortable taking care of them, you should send them to somebody that is. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:33
clinical European neuroblastoma procedures are performed in more than 200 hospitals yet still demonstrated survival improvements ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:03
clinical Older data shows worse survival in neuroblastoma when kidney is removed, likely because single kidney limits chemotherapy dosing ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:52
quote If you can't be informed, be opinionated ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 25:38
clinical Immunotherapy is effective in neuroblastoma in the setting of minimal residual disease ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 25:38
clinical Immunotherapy is effective in neuroblastoma in the setting of minimal residual disease ↗

Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 3 · 2:11
clinical Other differential diagnoses for suprarenal mass include neuroblastoma, pulmonary sequestration below the diaphragm, and misdiagnosed renal anomaly ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 2:11
clinical Adrenal hemorrhage is the most common differential diagnosis for prenatal suprarenal mass, more common with history of fetal stress ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 6:02
opinion Radiologists are quite good at identifying adrenal hemorrhage on ultrasound ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 6:02
guideline MIBG scan is the next step if catecholamines are elevated ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:14
clinical In perinatal phase, most common metastatic sites are liver, bone, skin, and lymph nodes ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 8:44
guideline Nocktern study data supports observation of prenatal neuroblastoma with careful ultrasound surveillance ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 12:27
quote The only caution I would raise is that we had a case of a child who presented with exactly this scenario, was observed, the adrenal mass went away and age at age three she presented with widely metastatic high risk neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 12:27
clinical Case report: child with observed prenatal adrenal mass that resolved presented at age 3 with widely metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 16:36
clinical Lymph node status in neuroblastoma is not as important for therapy changes as in Wilms tumor ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 17:58
clinical Primary concern in stage MS with liver involvement is mass effect causing respiratory compromise ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 17:58
quote The most common thing that we worry about is is the mass, is the mass effect of the tumor in the liver, which can be really dramatic and causes respiratory compromise. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 19:06
opinion Classic findings of stage MS (high catecholamines, blue blebs on skin, liver metastasis, adrenal mass) may not require biopsy ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 25:06
epidemiological 10% of neuroblastomas are not MIBG avid ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 25:06
clinical PET scan may detect metastases in MIBG-negative neuroblastomas ↗

Topics in 10: Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 5 · 0:41
clinical In younger patients, neuroblastoma is often picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids (two-year-old or three-year-old) as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 0:41
quote So in the younger patients, they're oftentimes picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids, say two-year-old or three-year-old, it might be picked up as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 0:41
clinical When neuroblastoma patients have metastatic disease, they may present with either bony pain or potentially neurologic symptoms from cord compression. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 1:07
clinical When considering neuroblastoma as part of the differential diagnosis, it is important to get catecholamines (either urine or serum) as one of the most diagnostic laboratory tests for this tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 1:39
clinical If imaging suggests neuroblastoma (central abdominal mass or adrenal mass rather than kidney mass), the next test would be a nuclear medicine study, typically an MIBG study. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 1:39
clinical Most children with suspected neuroblastoma would get a cross-sectional imaging study, either a CT scan or an MRI. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 1:39
clinical The MIBG study is helpful for confirming the diagnosis of neuroblastoma and can also demonstrate metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:20
clinical About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:20
quote About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:20
clinical Some centers, including Cincinnati Children's Hospital, would get a PET scan looking for tumor uptake as well as potential metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:45
guideline Based on the most recent iteration of the neuroblastoma staging system (INRGSS), it is possible to assign a stage before any invasive procedure is performed. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:45
guideline In the INRGSS system, tumors that are localized are categorized as L1; if localized but have image-defined risk factors (encasing nerves or vessels), they are L2; if they have metastatic disease, they are M. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 2:45
guideline There is a special category MS for children less than 18 months of age who have metastases to either the bone marrow or the skin. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:36
guideline The prior neuroblastoma staging system required tissue diagnosis before assigning a stage. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:36
guideline The INRGSS pre-biopsy staging system was specifically created to allow studies from different centers in different countries to be compared based on the pre-surgical staging of the patient. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:06
clinical A child with an adrenal mass on the right side and a positive MIBG scan but no evidence of metastases could potentially be treated with a primary resection of the mass via laparotomy. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:06
opinion Some surgeons would approach resection of a localized neuroblastoma with laparoscopy depending on the size of the tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:44
clinical For very large masses that encase the aorta, cava, or other major vasculature, all you really want is tissue for diagnosis, which can be obtained through open biopsy, laparoscopic biopsy, or core needle biopsies done by an interventional radiologist. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 5:14
clinical The most important biologic risk determinant to obtain from neuroblastoma biopsy tissue is the NMIC status. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 5:14
clinical In addition to NMIC status, you want to look for 1P and 11Q deletions and Shimada histology in neuroblastoma biopsy tissue. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 5:45
clinical Biologic risk determinants from biopsy will tell you what risk category the patient falls into: very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 5:45
epidemiological Neuroblastoma risk is divided about 50-50 between the low risk categories and the high risk category, with a smaller percentage being intermediate risk. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 6:11
clinical Patients with high risk neuroblastoma receive aggressive chemotherapy including peripheral stem cell transplant times 2, aggressive surgery with the goal of greater than 90% resection of the tumor, followed by radiation, immunotherapy after chemotherapy, and potentially retinoic acid therapy. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 6:11
clinical NMIC amplification and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 6:11
quote NMIC and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 6:51
clinical Intermediate risk neuroblastoma tumors get varying cycles of chemotherapy based on the biologic risk factors they have. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 6:51
clinical For intermediate risk neuroblastoma, the goal at the time of debulking or resecting the primary tumor is to achieve at least a 50% response from the initial volume of the primary tumor through the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:22
clinical Jed Nocturne led a study through the Children's Oncology Group looking at patients less than six months of age with either a prenatally diagnosed or shortly postnatally diagnosed localized mass, showing these patients can be observed with the expectation that the vast majority will avoid any type of surgical procedure. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:22
clinical The low risk neuroblastoma group, depending on the actual age of the patient and how it is diagnosed, could potentially be followed simply with observation. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:55
clinical Patients with metastatic neuroblastoma typically receive four or five cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then are reassessed. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:55
quote MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow, specifically not bone, not cortical bone, and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:55
clinical If the tumor and metastatic disease are responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, one would attack the primary tumor site with a resection, with many advocating for attempting a greater than 90% resection. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:55
clinical In patients with MS disease, simple observation can be the treatment path. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:55
clinical MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow (specifically not bone, not cortical bone) and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:55
clinical If the metastatic disease is progressing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, then surgery is not indicated. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:55
clinical If MS disease patients progress or develop respiratory issues because of an enlarging liver mass, treatment might be elected because of the complication of the size of the tumor, but the tumor itself usually does not have to be treated. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 8:55
clinical You can biopsy the skin lesions in MS disease and that will give you the diagnosis. ↗

Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 6 · 2:00
clinical Adrenal hemorrhage is the most common cause of prenatal suprarenal mass, especially with history of fetal stress ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 7:24
clinical The GetNucturne study showed that prenatal/neonatal neuroblastomas can be safely observed with careful ultrasound surveillance, with many patients spared surgery ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 14:21
clinical Lymph node status in neuroblastoma does not change therapy, unlike Wilms tumor ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 22:12
clinical Approximately 10% of neuroblastomas are not MIBG-avid, which is when PET scan may be useful ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 43:17
clinical Tumor shrinkage in neuroblastoma plateaus after cycle 2-3 of chemotherapy per LaQuaglia and Von Allman studies ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 44:04
clinical COG high-risk study showed >90% resection improved event-free survival but not overall survival (approximately 245 patients) ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 45:28
clinical European neuroblastoma group study (approximately 1000 cases) showed >90% resection improved both event-free survival and overall survival ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 46:10
epidemiological Approximately 70% of high-risk neuroblastoma patients can achieve >90% resection ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 50:54
clinical Neuroblastoma theoretically does not invade vessel adventitia, though invasion has been observed ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 51:30
clinical There is zero correlation between surgeon operative note description of resection extent and post-operative imaging findings ↗
Daniel's statements about Neuroblastoma 62 statements

Open the Neuroblastoma collection →

Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 1 · 2:11
clinical Adrenal hemorrhage is the most common differential diagnosis for prenatal suprarenal mass, more common with history of fetal stress ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 2:11
clinical Other differential diagnoses for suprarenal mass include neuroblastoma, pulmonary sequestration below the diaphragm, and misdiagnosed renal anomaly ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:02
guideline MIBG scan is the next step if catecholamines are elevated ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 6:02
opinion Radiologists are quite good at identifying adrenal hemorrhage on ultrasound ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:14
clinical In perinatal phase, most common metastatic sites are liver, bone, skin, and lymph nodes ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 8:44
guideline Nocktern study data supports observation of prenatal neuroblastoma with careful ultrasound surveillance ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 12:27
clinical Case report: child with observed prenatal adrenal mass that resolved presented at age 3 with widely metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 12:27
quote The only caution I would raise is that we had a case of a child who presented with exactly this scenario, was observed, the adrenal mass went away and age at age three she presented with widely metastatic high risk neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 16:36
clinical Lymph node status in neuroblastoma is not as important for therapy changes as in Wilms tumor ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 17:58
clinical Primary concern in stage MS with liver involvement is mass effect causing respiratory compromise ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 17:58
quote The most common thing that we worry about is is the mass, is the mass effect of the tumor in the liver, which can be really dramatic and causes respiratory compromise. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 19:06
opinion Classic findings of stage MS (high catecholamines, blue blebs on skin, liver metastasis, adrenal mass) may not require biopsy ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 25:06
epidemiological 10% of neuroblastomas are not MIBG avid ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 25:06
clinical PET scan may detect metastases in MIBG-negative neuroblastomas ↗

Topics in 10: Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 2 · 0:41
quote So in the younger patients, they're oftentimes picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids, say two-year-old or three-year-old, it might be picked up as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 0:41
clinical In younger patients, neuroblastoma is often picked up either prenatally on ultrasound, or in younger kids (two-year-old or three-year-old) as a solid abdominal mass. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 0:41
clinical When neuroblastoma patients have metastatic disease, they may present with either bony pain or potentially neurologic symptoms from cord compression. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 1:07
clinical When considering neuroblastoma as part of the differential diagnosis, it is important to get catecholamines (either urine or serum) as one of the most diagnostic laboratory tests for this tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 1:39
clinical The MIBG study is helpful for confirming the diagnosis of neuroblastoma and can also demonstrate metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 1:39
clinical Most children with suspected neuroblastoma would get a cross-sectional imaging study, either a CT scan or an MRI. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 1:39
clinical If imaging suggests neuroblastoma (central abdominal mass or adrenal mass rather than kidney mass), the next test would be a nuclear medicine study, typically an MIBG study. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:20
clinical Some centers, including Cincinnati Children's Hospital, would get a PET scan looking for tumor uptake as well as potential metastatic disease. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:20
quote About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:20
clinical About 10% of neuroblastomas are MIBG negative. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:45
guideline There is a special category MS for children less than 18 months of age who have metastases to either the bone marrow or the skin. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:45
guideline In the INRGSS system, tumors that are localized are categorized as L1; if localized but have image-defined risk factors (encasing nerves or vessels), they are L2; if they have metastatic disease, they are M. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 2:45
guideline Based on the most recent iteration of the neuroblastoma staging system (INRGSS), it is possible to assign a stage before any invasive procedure is performed. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 3:36
guideline The prior neuroblastoma staging system required tissue diagnosis before assigning a stage. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 3:36
guideline The INRGSS pre-biopsy staging system was specifically created to allow studies from different centers in different countries to be compared based on the pre-surgical staging of the patient. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 4:06
clinical A child with an adrenal mass on the right side and a positive MIBG scan but no evidence of metastases could potentially be treated with a primary resection of the mass via laparotomy. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 4:06
opinion Some surgeons would approach resection of a localized neuroblastoma with laparoscopy depending on the size of the tumor. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 4:44
clinical For very large masses that encase the aorta, cava, or other major vasculature, all you really want is tissue for diagnosis, which can be obtained through open biopsy, laparoscopic biopsy, or core needle biopsies done by an interventional radiologist. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 5:14
clinical The most important biologic risk determinant to obtain from neuroblastoma biopsy tissue is the NMIC status. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 5:14
clinical In addition to NMIC status, you want to look for 1P and 11Q deletions and Shimada histology in neuroblastoma biopsy tissue. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 5:45
epidemiological Neuroblastoma risk is divided about 50-50 between the low risk categories and the high risk category, with a smaller percentage being intermediate risk. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 5:45
clinical Biologic risk determinants from biopsy will tell you what risk category the patient falls into: very low risk, low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:11
clinical NMIC amplification and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:11
clinical Patients with high risk neuroblastoma receive aggressive chemotherapy including peripheral stem cell transplant times 2, aggressive surgery with the goal of greater than 90% resection of the tumor, followed by radiation, immunotherapy after chemotherapy, and potentially retinoic acid therapy. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:11
quote NMIC and age greater than 18 months are the most important prognostic determinants for neuroblastoma. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:51
clinical For intermediate risk neuroblastoma, the goal at the time of debulking or resecting the primary tumor is to achieve at least a 50% response from the initial volume of the primary tumor through the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 6:51
clinical Intermediate risk neuroblastoma tumors get varying cycles of chemotherapy based on the biologic risk factors they have. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:22
clinical Jed Nocturne led a study through the Children's Oncology Group looking at patients less than six months of age with either a prenatally diagnosed or shortly postnatally diagnosed localized mass, showing these patients can be observed with the expectation that the vast majority will avoid any type of surgical procedure. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:22
clinical The low risk neuroblastoma group, depending on the actual age of the patient and how it is diagnosed, could potentially be followed simply with observation. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:55
clinical MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow (specifically not bone, not cortical bone) and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:55
clinical In patients with MS disease, simple observation can be the treatment path. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:55
clinical If MS disease patients progress or develop respiratory issues because of an enlarging liver mass, treatment might be elected because of the complication of the size of the tumor, but the tumor itself usually does not have to be treated. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:55
clinical Patients with metastatic neuroblastoma typically receive four or five cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then are reassessed. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:55
quote MS disease is specifically for patients who have a primary site with metastatic disease to the liver, the skin, or the bone marrow, specifically not bone, not cortical bone, and is less than 18 months of age. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:55
clinical If the tumor and metastatic disease are responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, one would attack the primary tumor site with a resection, with many advocating for attempting a greater than 90% resection. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 7:55
clinical If the metastatic disease is progressing on neoadjuvant chemotherapy, then surgery is not indicated. ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 8:55
clinical You can biopsy the skin lesions in MS disease and that will give you the diagnosis. ↗

Neuroblastoma

▶ Ep 3 · 2:00
clinical Adrenal hemorrhage is the most common cause of prenatal suprarenal mass, especially with history of fetal stress ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 7:24
clinical The GetNucturne study showed that prenatal/neonatal neuroblastomas can be safely observed with careful ultrasound surveillance, with many patients spared surgery ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 14:21
clinical Lymph node status in neuroblastoma does not change therapy, unlike Wilms tumor ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 22:12
clinical Approximately 10% of neuroblastomas are not MIBG-avid, which is when PET scan may be useful ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 43:17
clinical Tumor shrinkage in neuroblastoma plateaus after cycle 2-3 of chemotherapy per LaQuaglia and Von Allman studies ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 44:04
clinical COG high-risk study showed >90% resection improved event-free survival but not overall survival (approximately 245 patients) ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 45:28
clinical European neuroblastoma group study (approximately 1000 cases) showed >90% resection improved both event-free survival and overall survival ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 46:10
epidemiological Approximately 70% of high-risk neuroblastoma patients can achieve >90% resection ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 50:54
clinical Neuroblastoma theoretically does not invade vessel adventitia, though invasion has been observed ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 51:30
clinical There is zero correlation between surgeon operative note description of resection extent and post-operative imaging findings ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 51:30
quote There is zero correlation, zero. There is absolutely no correlation between the findings on post-op imaging and the findings that are reported in the op note. ↗

Summaries Daniel gave as host · 161 summaries

Recaps of other experts' statements, not Daniel's own clinical position.

Summaries Daniel gave as host · Appendicitis 14 summaries

Open the Appendicitis collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 4 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 7 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Appendicitis 14 summaries

Open the Appendicitis collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 5 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 10 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Biliary Atresia 14 summaries

Open the Biliary Atresia collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 6 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 6 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 10 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 10 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Colorectal / ARM & Hirschsprung 7 summaries

Open the Colorectal / ARM & Hirschsprung collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 76 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 76 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Enterocolitis 1 summary

Open the Enterocolitis collection →

Hirschprung's Disease - Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 2 · 9:00
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: the baby's first enema should be a barium enema ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Enterocolitis 1 summary

Open the Enterocolitis collection →

Hirschprung's Disease - Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 2 · 9:00
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: the baby's first enema should be a barium enema ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Esophageal Atresia 11 summaries

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 2 · 31:37
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: Atlanta group uses stay stitch between two ends brought out of chest to hold anastomosis up for subsequent stitches, similar to duodenal atresia technique ↗

Treatment for Long Gap Esophageal Atresia: Esophageal Elongation and Replacement

▶ Ep 5 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, the primary group had a median ICU stay of 70 days with a couple of weeks being paralyzed, and the secondary group had a median ICU stay of 110 days with a month of being paralyzed. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, the primary group (de novo cases) achieved an intact esophagus in 96% of patients, while the secondary group (patients with previous operations) achieved this in about two thirds of patients. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, about two thirds of patients with primary repair were able to get full oral nutrition and about 10% of patients who had secondary repair achieved full oral nutrition. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: But these procedures are not without some morbidity. And you look at the ICU stay is a median of 70 days with a couple of weeks being paralyzed for the primary group and 110 days for the secondary group with a month of being paralyzed. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: About two thirds of patients with the primary repair were able to get the full oral nutrition and about 10% of the patients who had the secondary repair. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: Obviously, you look at the result of getting the esophagus together and intact esophagus in 96% of patients in the primary group, about two thirds of patients in the secondary group. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: There was a great article published by the Boston Group 2015. Divides the cases into two groups, a primary group and a secondary group. Secondary being patients who had had operations previously in the primary group, being cases that they saw de novo. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: You divide the esophageal stump at the esophageal hiatus and mobilize the fundus and pull the fundus up and you can pull it up either in the anterior or posterior mediastinum. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: The surgical group from INOEA recommends gastric pull up as the first option for esophageal replacement, dividing the esophageal stump at the esophageal hiatus and mobilizing the fundus to pull it up in either the anterior or posterior mediastinum. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: You could use the stomach. That would be called a gastric transposition. The surgical group from the INOEA, their recommendation, the recommendation for the first option is a gastric pull up. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Esophageal Atresia 1 summary

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 26 · 31:37
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: Atlanta group uses stay stitch between two ends brought out of chest to hold anastomosis up for subsequent stitches, similar to duodenal atresia technique ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Esophageal Atresia 1 summary

Open the Esophageal Atresia collection →

Tracheoesophageal Fistula with Dr. Daniel von Allmen

▶ Ep 21 · 31:37
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: Atlanta group uses stay stitch between two ends brought out of chest to hold anastomosis up for subsequent stitches, similar to duodenal atresia technique ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Etiologies (Gastroschisis/NEC/Atresia/Volvulus) 7 summaries

Open the Etiologies (Gastroschisis/NEC/Atresia/Volvulus) collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 26 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 26 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Gastroesophageal Reflux 3 summaries

Open the Gastroesophageal Reflux collection →

Gastoesophageal Reflux: Update Course 2015

▶ Ep 1 · 8:43
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: In adult literature, after about 15 years almost all fundoplications are undone ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 9:03
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: If you look at the adult literature for fund application, after about 15 years, almost all of them are, are, are undone. And so I don't know why we think that ours is going to be any different. We just don't follow our patients past 18. ↗
▶ Ep 1 · 21:20
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Neurologically impaired patients do worse than neurologically normal patients after fundoplication according to historical data ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 3 summaries

Open the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease collection →

Gastoesophageal Reflux: Update Course 2015

▶ Ep 5 · 8:43
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: In adult literature, after about 15 years almost all fundoplications are undone ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:03
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: If you look at the adult literature for fund application, after about 15 years, almost all of them are, are, are undone. And so I don't know why we think that ours is going to be any different. We just don't follow our patients past 18. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 21:20
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Neurologically impaired patients do worse than neurologically normal patients after fundoplication according to historical data ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 3 summaries

Open the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease collection →

Gastoesophageal Reflux: Update Course 2015

▶ Ep 5 · 8:43
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: In adult literature, after about 15 years almost all fundoplications are undone ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 9:03
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: If you look at the adult literature for fund application, after about 15 years, almost all of them are, are, are undone. And so I don't know why we think that ours is going to be any different. We just don't follow our patients past 18. ↗
▶ Ep 5 · 21:20
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Neurologically impaired patients do worse than neurologically normal patients after fundoplication according to historical data ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · High-risk Neuroblastoma 13 summaries

Open the High-risk Neuroblastoma collection →

Neuroblastoma: Update Course 2014

▶ Ep 2 · 10:00
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Memorial Sloan Kettering data suggests biggest volume response of neuroblastoma tumor occurs with first two cycles of chemotherapy, with very little response after that ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 16:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study of 278 stage 4 high-risk neuroblastoma patients achieved complete resection in almost half and >90% resection in another quarter (75% total with >90% resection) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:13
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study showed overall survival 45%, event-free survival 33%, and local progression-free survival 58% in stage 4 neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study showed no difference in overall survival, event-free survival, or local progression-free survival based on completeness of resection in stage 4 neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:51
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study concluded aggressive surgery is not justified in stage 4 neuroblastoma, that limited operations decrease complications, and there is limited impact on patient outcome ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:14
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European study included 1,324 high-risk neuroblastoma patients (stages 2, 3, and 4) and achieved 76% with >95% resection ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:02
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European neuroblastoma study showed 0.5% mortality and 10% morbidity (30% including lesser complications) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:17
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European study showed significant improvement in event-free survival and overall survival with aggressive resection in high-risk neuroblastoma - first study to show overall survival benefit ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 20:17
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European study concluded >95% resection results in improvement in event-free survival in high-risk neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:24
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: COG 3973 study of approximately 230 high-risk neuroblastoma patients showed significant improvement in local relapse-free survival and event-free survival but not overall survival ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:33
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European neuroblastoma procedures are performed in more than 200 hospitals yet still demonstrated survival improvements ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:03
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Older data shows worse survival in neuroblastoma when kidney is removed, likely because single kidney limits chemotherapy dosing ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:52
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: If you can't be informed, be opinionated ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Intestinal Failure 14 summaries

Open the Intestinal Failure collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 3 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 7 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 7 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Intestinal Rehab 14 summaries

Open the Intestinal Rehab collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 14 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 14 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 35 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 35 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Intestinal Transplant 7 summaries

Open the Intestinal Transplant collection →

Biliary Atresia, Appendicitis, Intestinal Failure, and Anesthetic...

▶ Ep 4 · 2:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The START trial randomized 140 infants with biliary atresia to high-dose steroids (IV for 2 weeks, oral for 2 weeks, taper over 9 weeks) versus placebo within 72 hours of Kasai portoenterostomy. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 3:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The primary outcome was serum total bilirubin <1.5 mg/dL with native liver at 6 months post-Kasai; the study was powered to detect a 25% absolute treatment difference. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:01
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: High-dose steroid therapy after Kasai did not result in a statistically significant treatment difference in bile drainage at 6 months: 58.6% in the steroid group versus 48.6% in placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:39
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Survival without liver transplant at 24 months was not statistically different: 58.7% for steroids versus 49.4% for placebo. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 4:55
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Adverse events were common in both groups (near 80%), largely reflecting severe underlying liver dysfunction; steroid treatment was associated with earlier onset of serious adverse events. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the paper, and I believe them, feel that anything less than a 25% difference is probably not worth the potential risk of the early complications associated with the steroids. ↗
▶ Ep 4 · 7:11
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: The authors of the START trial believe anything less than a 25% difference in bile drainage is not worth the potential early complications of steroids. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Long-gap Esophageal Atresia 10 summaries

Open the Long-gap Esophageal Atresia collection →

Treatment for Long Gap Esophageal Atresia: Esophageal Elongation and Replacement

▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: Obviously, you look at the result of getting the esophagus together and intact esophagus in 96% of patients in the primary group, about two thirds of patients in the secondary group. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: But these procedures are not without some morbidity. And you look at the ICU stay is a median of 70 days with a couple of weeks being paralyzed for the primary group and 110 days for the secondary group with a month of being paralyzed. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: About two thirds of patients with the primary repair were able to get the full oral nutrition and about 10% of the patients who had the secondary repair. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: There was a great article published by the Boston Group 2015. Divides the cases into two groups, a primary group and a secondary group. Secondary being patients who had had operations previously in the primary group, being cases that they saw de novo. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, the primary group (de novo cases) achieved an intact esophagus in 96% of patients, while the secondary group (patients with previous operations) achieved this in about two thirds of patients. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, about two thirds of patients with primary repair were able to get full oral nutrition and about 10% of patients who had secondary repair achieved full oral nutrition. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, the primary group had a median ICU stay of 70 days with a couple of weeks being paralyzed, and the secondary group had a median ICU stay of 110 days with a month of being paralyzed. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: You could use the stomach. That would be called a gastric transposition. The surgical group from the INOEA, their recommendation, the recommendation for the first option is a gastric pull up. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: The surgical group from INOEA recommends gastric pull up as the first option for esophageal replacement, dividing the esophageal stump at the esophageal hiatus and mobilizing the fundus to pull it up in either the anterior or posterior mediastinum. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: You divide the esophageal stump at the esophageal hiatus and mobilize the fundus and pull the fundus up and you can pull it up either in the anterior or posterior mediastinum. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Long Gap Esophageal Atresia 10 summaries

Open the Long Gap Esophageal Atresia collection →

Treatment for Long Gap Esophageal Atresia: Esophageal Elongation and Replacement

▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: There was a great article published by the Boston Group 2015. Divides the cases into two groups, a primary group and a secondary group. Secondary being patients who had had operations previously in the primary group, being cases that they saw de novo. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, the primary group (de novo cases) achieved an intact esophagus in 96% of patients, while the secondary group (patients with previous operations) achieved this in about two thirds of patients. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, the primary group had a median ICU stay of 70 days with a couple of weeks being paralyzed, and the secondary group had a median ICU stay of 110 days with a month of being paralyzed. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: In the Boston Group 2015 study, about two thirds of patients with primary repair were able to get full oral nutrition and about 10% of patients who had secondary repair achieved full oral nutrition. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: But these procedures are not without some morbidity. And you look at the ICU stay is a median of 70 days with a couple of weeks being paralyzed for the primary group and 110 days for the secondary group with a month of being paralyzed. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: Obviously, you look at the result of getting the esophagus together and intact esophagus in 96% of patients in the primary group, about two thirds of patients in the secondary group. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 3:15
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: About two thirds of patients with the primary repair were able to get the full oral nutrition and about 10% of the patients who had the secondary repair. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: You divide the esophageal stump at the esophageal hiatus and mobilize the fundus and pull the fundus up and you can pull it up either in the anterior or posterior mediastinum. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: The surgical group from INOEA recommends gastric pull up as the first option for esophageal replacement, dividing the esophageal stump at the esophageal hiatus and mobilizing the fundus to pull it up in either the anterior or posterior mediastinum. ↗
▶ Ep 3 · 4:36
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing a resource: You could use the stomach. That would be called a gastric transposition. The surgical group from the INOEA, their recommendation, the recommendation for the first option is a gastric pull up. ↗
Summaries Daniel gave as host · Neuroblastoma 13 summaries

Open the Neuroblastoma collection →

Neuroblastoma: Update Course 2014

▶ Ep 2 · 10:00
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Memorial Sloan Kettering data suggests biggest volume response of neuroblastoma tumor occurs with first two cycles of chemotherapy, with very little response after that ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 16:48
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study of 278 stage 4 high-risk neuroblastoma patients achieved complete resection in almost half and >90% resection in another quarter (75% total with >90% resection) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:13
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study showed overall survival 45%, event-free survival 33%, and local progression-free survival 58% in stage 4 neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:32
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study showed no difference in overall survival, event-free survival, or local progression-free survival based on completeness of resection in stage 4 neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 17:51
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: German study concluded aggressive surgery is not justified in stage 4 neuroblastoma, that limited operations decrease complications, and there is limited impact on patient outcome ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 18:14
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European study included 1,324 high-risk neuroblastoma patients (stages 2, 3, and 4) and achieved 76% with >95% resection ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:02
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European neuroblastoma study showed 0.5% mortality and 10% morbidity (30% including lesser complications) ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 19:17
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European study showed significant improvement in event-free survival and overall survival with aggressive resection in high-risk neuroblastoma - first study to show overall survival benefit ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 20:17
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European study concluded >95% resection results in improvement in event-free survival in high-risk neuroblastoma ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 21:24
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: COG 3973 study of approximately 230 high-risk neuroblastoma patients showed significant improvement in local relapse-free survival and event-free survival but not overall survival ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 23:33
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: European neuroblastoma procedures are performed in more than 200 hospitals yet still demonstrated survival improvements ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:03
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: Older data shows worse survival in neuroblastoma when kidney is removed, likely because single kidney limits chemotherapy dosing ↗
▶ Ep 2 · 24:52
host summary Daniel von Allmen summarizing the discussion: If you can't be informed, be opinionated ↗