StayCurrentMD · Factors responsible for stage III disease in patients with Wilms tumor enrolled in the JWiTS-2 study
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Oct 2019Older

Factors responsible for stage III disease in patients with Wilms tumor enrolled in the JWiTS-2 study

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Oct 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Japanese multi-center study of 45 stage III Wilms tumor patients found excellent outcomes (95% survival) with current protocols, but high tumor spillage rates (56%) suggest preoperative chemotherapy may be preferable to primary resection in large tumors to reduce treatment intensity and late effects.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background/objectives

Treatment is more intensive for stage III Wilms tumor (WT) than for stages I and II non-metastatic WTs. Various factors including tumor spillage, unresectability, and lymph node metastasis are responsible for stage III disease. The present study aimed to not identify clinical factors associated with the features of stage III WT to establish new treatment strategies.

Design/methods

Of 166 patients with non-metastatic WT enrolled in the Japan Wilms Tumor Study (JWiTS)-2, 51 patients had stage III disease. The treatment protocol for JWiTS-2 was essentially the same as that in the National Wilms Tumor study (NWTS)-5. Local hospitals were surveyed to collect details of clinical findings related to stage III disease, and data regarding 45 (88%) patients were obtained.

Results

Nine patients with massive tumors underwent preoperative chemotherapy. Biopsy was performed in 6. Reduction in the tumor size was achieved in 8 of the 9 cases. Nephrectomy was finally performed in all of them. Thirty-six patients underwent primary nephrectomy. The reason for the stage III disease was lymph node metastasis (n = 9, 25%), tumor spillage (n = 20, 56%), and tumor extension/incomplete resection (n = 17, 47%). Some patients had more than one of these factors. Most patients were treated with the DD-4A regimen, and 43 (95.6%) of the 45 patients received abdominal radiation therapy. Tumors recurred in three patients (local, 1; metastasis, 2), and two patients died. Overall and relapse-free survival rates were 95.2% and 90.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

The prognosis of stage III WT was good. In the next stage, the doses of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be reduced to avoid late effects. The high rate of tumor spillage after primary resection suggests that preoperative chemotherapy should be started instead of aggressive tumor resection in the large tumor cases with surgical risks

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →