From
Dr. Alexander Chiu
Draf IIB with superior septectomy: finding the “middle ground”
onlinelibrary.wiley.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on onlinelibrary.wiley.com ↗Article · Jun 2026 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This cadaveric study evaluates a modified Draf IIb frontal sinusotomy with superior septectomy as an intermediate surgical option for patients with diffuse polyposis and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. Fluorescein irrigation studies demonstrated equivalent sinus penetration compared to the more extensive endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure, suggesting this technique may offer similar therapeutic benefit with potentially less morbidity.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Background Previous studies have demonstrated a high failure rate of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with Draf IIa in patients with diffuse polyposis, asthma, and aspirin‐exacerbated respiratory disease. A high percentage of these patients progress to endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP). We describe a modification of the Draf IIb with a superior septectomy (IIb+SS), which may provide similar therapeutic benefit as demonstrated by the distribution of sinus irrigations in the sinus cavity with ESS with IIb+SS vs ESS with EMLP. Methods ESS with IIb+SS was performed on 6 cadaver heads. Fluorescein‐dyed irrigations were performed on each head and penetration was recorded using video endoscopy. EMLP was subsequently performed on each head with repeat dye‐irrigation and video endoscopy. The videos were reviewed by 4 blinded fellowship‐trained rhinologists, and irrigant penetration of the maxillary, ethmoid, frontal, sphenoid sinuses, and olfactory cleft was graded 0 to 3 (3 implying complete staining). Results The mean scores when comparing IIb+SS to EMLP were as follows: overall 1.99 vs 1.97 ( p = 0.816), maxillary sinus 2.67 vs 2.38 ( p = 0.128), ethmoid sinus 1.88 vs 1.98 ( p = 0.536), sphenoid sinus 2.58 vs 2.50 ( p = 0.467), frontal sinus 1.13 vs 1.38 ( p = 0.073), and olfactory cleft 1.71 vs 1.63 ( p = 0.529). There was no significant difference between subsites. Interrater reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha = 0.781). Conclusion Performing ESS with IIb+SS provides
Educational content from recorded physician discussions — not medical advice. Talk to your (or your child's) care team about your situation.
Article
Prevalence of Biofilm-forming Bacteria in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Article
In Vivo Effects of Citric Acid/Zwitterionic Surfactant Cleansing Solution on Rabbit Sinus Mucosa
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Article
Positional Installation of Intranasal Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Article
Diagnosis and endoscopic management of sinonasal schwannomas
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Article
Multifocal inverting papilloma of the sinonasal cavity and temporal bone
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Article
Sinonasal Tumors
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Article
Results - OpenURL Connection
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Video
Understanding Health Equity Research w/ Kevin Sykes, PhD, MPH | BackTable ENT Podcast Ep. 152
Alexander Chiu · 61 min · Published Jun 2026
Article
A Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma of Mixed Histology: Implications for Management of All Sinonasal Papillomas
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Video
Health Equity Collaborative in ENT w/ Dr. Alexander Chiu & Dr. Romaine Johnson | ENT Podcast Ep. 98
Alexander Chiu · 41 min · Published Jun 2026
Article
Reversal of Chronic Rhinosinusitis-Associated Sinonasal Ciliary Dysfunction
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
Article
Mini‐Nasoseptal Flap for Recalcitrant Sphenoid Sinusitis
Alexander Chiu · Published Jun 2026
